Old cameras of mine by Keith Breazeal, on FlickrPookie said:Zeidora said:We're a DANKs household, so two science PhDs, no issues with "toys". And I make figures for her papers "nice". Get a lot of milage out of thatPookie said:Zeidora said:LF Schneider XLs indeed! also Rodenstock, or Sinar.
Then there are the co-opted lenses such as a EL Nikkor 80 mm for UV reflectance. And the Coastaloptics version, that I am contemplating. I do clean out the closet with stuff I don't use anymore. Almost all my C/Y Zeisses are gone (except the 16 mm F-Distagon), and replaced with EOS mount versions. But if it works, and I use it once in a blue moon, I keep it.
Don't know how many lenses I've rotated through; guess around 50 or so. I currently have about 13 SLR lenses (all primes), and about 7 LF (one is the Nikkor-T360/500/720 triple convertible) lenses, plus three stereomicroscope lenses, and five compound microscope lenses for my personal scopes.
So, your sickness runs deep.
In my house, the first rule is... we don't ever talk about the lenses or the cameras.
The second rule is WE DON'T EVER TALK ABOUT THE LENSES OR THE CAMERAS !!!!
When too many Canon lenses are talked about here I think... how cute.
Re Canon lenses, they are the minority in my line-up (TSE17/24, MPE65, 180M, 300/2.8 IS). The good ones are Zeiss (F16 C/Y, 15, 21, 25, 35, 100 Classic, 55 Otus) and the EL Nikkor 80.
Ahh, same here... PhD in Biochemistry and wife has PhD in CS. I no longer work in the industry (worked in a startup and fortunately it worked) but wife is in cyber-security.
And Canon is by no means a majority in my house, it is what I use for business (portrait/wedding). Leica is actually a close second to all MF lenses. Analog is starting to rule the house these days as I have the ability to take my time now (love the darkroom). Whats old is becoming new again !
AlanF said:Pookie said:Zeidora said:We're a DANKs household, so two science PhDs, no issues with "toys". And I make figures for her papers "nice". Get a lot of milage out of thatPookie said:Zeidora said:LF Schneider XLs indeed! also Rodenstock, or Sinar.
Then there are the co-opted lenses such as a EL Nikkor 80 mm for UV reflectance. And the Coastaloptics version, that I am contemplating. I do clean out the closet with stuff I don't use anymore. Almost all my C/Y Zeisses are gone (except the 16 mm F-Distagon), and replaced with EOS mount versions. But if it works, and I use it once in a blue moon, I keep it.
Don't know how many lenses I've rotated through; guess around 50 or so. I currently have about 13 SLR lenses (all primes), and about 7 LF (one is the Nikkor-T360/500/720 triple convertible) lenses, plus three stereomicroscope lenses, and five compound microscope lenses for my personal scopes.
So, your sickness runs deep.
In my house, the first rule is... we don't ever talk about the lenses or the cameras.
The second rule is WE DON'T EVER TALK ABOUT THE LENSES OR THE CAMERAS !!!!
When too many Canon lenses are talked about here I think... how cute.
Re Canon lenses, they are the minority in my line-up (TSE17/24, MPE65, 180M, 300/2.8 IS). The good ones are Zeiss (F16 C/Y, 15, 21, 25, 35, 100 Classic, 55 Otus) and the EL Nikkor 80.
Ahh, same here... PhD in Biochemistry and wife has PhD in CS. I no longer work in the industry (worked in a startup and fortunately it worked) but wife is in cyber-security.
And Canon is by no means a majority in my house, it is what I use for business (portrait/wedding). Leica is actually a close second to all MF lenses. Analog is starting to rule the house these days as I have the ability to take my time now (love the darkroom). Whats old is becoming new again !
Classic cases pf PhD = Piled Higher and Deeper.
Pookie said:So jealous... you can't handle it. Let me guess Liberal arts? Or none because your comment reflects a certain degree or lack of education...AlanF said:Classic cases pf PhD = Piled Higher and Deeper.
Pookie said:AlanF said:Pookie said:Zeidora said:We're a DANKs household, so two science PhDs, no issues with "toys". And I make figures for her papers "nice". Get a lot of milage out of thatPookie said:Zeidora said:LF Schneider XLs indeed! also Rodenstock, or Sinar.
Then there are the co-opted lenses such as a EL Nikkor 80 mm for UV reflectance. And the Coastaloptics version, that I am contemplating. I do clean out the closet with stuff I don't use anymore. Almost all my C/Y Zeisses are gone (except the 16 mm F-Distagon), and replaced with EOS mount versions. But if it works, and I use it once in a blue moon, I keep it.
Don't know how many lenses I've rotated through; guess around 50 or so. I currently have about 13 SLR lenses (all primes), and about 7 LF (one is the Nikkor-T360/500/720 triple convertible) lenses, plus three stereomicroscope lenses, and five compound microscope lenses for my personal scopes.
So, your sickness runs deep.
In my house, the first rule is... we don't ever talk about the lenses or the cameras.
The second rule is WE DON'T EVER TALK ABOUT THE LENSES OR THE CAMERAS !!!!
When too many Canon lenses are talked about here I think... how cute.
Re Canon lenses, they are the minority in my line-up (TSE17/24, MPE65, 180M, 300/2.8 IS). The good ones are Zeiss (F16 C/Y, 15, 21, 25, 35, 100 Classic, 55 Otus) and the EL Nikkor 80.
Ahh, same here... PhD in Biochemistry and wife has PhD in CS. I no longer work in the industry (worked in a startup and fortunately it worked) but wife is in cyber-security.
And Canon is by no means a majority in my house, it is what I use for business (portrait/wedding). Leica is actually a close second to all MF lenses. Analog is starting to rule the house these days as I have the ability to take my time now (love the darkroom). Whats old is becoming new again !
Classic cases pf PhD = Piled Higher and Deeper.
So jealous... you can't handle it. Let me guess Liberal arts? Or none because your comment reflects a certain degree or lack of education...
AlanF said:Pookie said:AlanF said:Pookie said:Zeidora said:We're a DANKs household, so two science PhDs, no issues with "toys". And I make figures for her papers "nice". Get a lot of milage out of thatPookie said:Zeidora said:LF Schneider XLs indeed! also Rodenstock, or Sinar.
Then there are the co-opted lenses such as a EL Nikkor 80 mm for UV reflectance. And the Coastaloptics version, that I am contemplating. I do clean out the closet with stuff I don't use anymore. Almost all my C/Y Zeisses are gone (except the 16 mm F-Distagon), and replaced with EOS mount versions. But if it works, and I use it once in a blue moon, I keep it.
Don't know how many lenses I've rotated through; guess around 50 or so. I currently have about 13 SLR lenses (all primes), and about 7 LF (one is the Nikkor-T360/500/720 triple convertible) lenses, plus three stereomicroscope lenses, and five compound microscope lenses for my personal scopes.
So, your sickness runs deep.
In my house, the first rule is... we don't ever talk about the lenses or the cameras.
The second rule is WE DON'T EVER TALK ABOUT THE LENSES OR THE CAMERAS !!!!
When too many Canon lenses are talked about here I think... how cute.
Re Canon lenses, they are the minority in my line-up (TSE17/24, MPE65, 180M, 300/2.8 IS). The good ones are Zeiss (F16 C/Y, 15, 21, 25, 35, 100 Classic, 55 Otus) and the EL Nikkor 80.
Ahh, same here... PhD in Biochemistry and wife has PhD in CS. I no longer work in the industry (worked in a startup and fortunately it worked) but wife is in cyber-security.
And Canon is by no means a majority in my house, it is what I use for business (portrait/wedding). Leica is actually a close second to all MF lenses. Analog is starting to rule the house these days as I have the ability to take my time now (love the darkroom). Whats old is becoming new again !
Classic cases pf PhD = Piled Higher and Deeper.
So jealous... you can't handle it. Let me guess Liberal arts? Or none because your comment reflects a certain degree or lack of education...
I was just making a joke about your lenses being so numerous that they are being piled high and deep. You shouldn't leap to conclusions about my lack of education or envy of your academic credentials. As it happens, I do have a science PhD myself plus 5x DSc honoris causa.
Right so your pile is the highest and deepest...AlanF said:I do have a real problem - I don't use emojis and some people don't know when I am joking. But, I hate those f*ing yellow things.
AlanF said:I do have a real problem - I don't use emojis and some people don't know when I am joking. But, I hate those f*ing yellow things.
takesome1 said:AlanF said:I do have a real problem - I don't use emojis and some people don't know when I am joking. But, I hate those f*ing yellow things.
This educational program might help.
http://sites.sonypictures.com/emojimovie/teaser/
AlanF said:takesome1 said:AlanF said:I do have a real problem - I don't use emojis and some people don't know when I am joking. But, I hate those f*ing yellow things.
This educational program might help.
http://sites.sonypictures.com/emojimovie/teaser/
I would need an antiemetic.
neuroanatomist said:Pookie said:So jealous... you can't handle it. Let me guess Liberal arts? Or none because your comment reflects a certain degree or lack of education...AlanF said:Classic cases pf PhD = Piled Higher and Deeper.
Such an inferiority complex? Alan probably has more scientific awards, medals and academic honors than you have brain cells. And this, from someone who has counted brain cells for a living. Certainly, he has a better sense of humor than you...
How many of these organizations can count you among their elected membership? For Alan, the answer is several.
But yeah, I'm sure you were just a fantastic and committed scientist. I guess that's why you aren't doing science any more. :![]()
IglooEater said:Yup, I’m definitely the uneducated one around... :-[ some folks here have more degrees than a thermometer
IglooEater said:Yup, I’m definitely the uneducated one around... :-[ some folks here have more degrees than a thermometer