tripod collar for 135 f/2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sort by date Sort by votes
pwp

pwp

Oct 25, 2010
2,527
24
19,631
#1
I have a 135 f/2, it's a nice sharp copy which needed +9 AFMA on all my bodies to become stellar. But I hardly use it, reaching more often for the 70-200 f/2.8isII.

Just now I realised why...no tripod collar. I shoot well over 50% portrait orientation, often on a monopod. If there was a tripod collar for the 135 f/2 I know I'd use it almost daily.

A quick web search including eBay revealed nothing...does anyone know if this item is exists?

-PW
 
#2
The lens isn't designed to accept one. The knurled area is too close to the body, then there's the switches/distance window, and the bare part after that rotates (it's part of the focus ring, just not rubberized).

As a generic (but expensive) solution for non-collared lenses, you could look at Really Right Stuff's Camera Rotation Device. I think Custom Brackets has something like it, as well.

EDIT: Regarding simply finding a collar with the right diameter, lenses designed to take a collar have a 'flat' area for it. There are highly customized (and costly) solutions for some lenses - well, actually I'm only aware of one, the Hartblei collar for TS-E 17/24 lenses to eliminate parallax for shift panos), not aware of anything for the 135L.
 
Upvote 0
#5

Attachments

  • LB-1.jpg
    LB-1.jpg
    116.8 KB · Views: 633
  • LB-2.jpg
    LB-2.jpg
    181 KB · Views: 678
Upvote 0
#6
Yes I thought this might be the case with the collar for the 135 f/2...no-go. Thanks for that.
The L Bracket looks like a viable option. I'll check that out.

Another reason I think I reach for the 135 f/2 less often is the lack of IS. Maybe I don't have the steady hands that other more fortunate photographers are blessed with. IS is a tool that bumps my keeper rate way up.

This has got me thinking I should off-load the 135 f/2 and get a Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro which can take a collar and has IS. Is the AF on the 100mm f/2.8L Macro quick? (Unlike my glacial old EF 100 macro from last century).

If there is a MkII 135 in Canon's future, IS and an optional collar would be appreciated.

-PW
 
Upvote 0
#7
Thought you had an L-bracket already, for some reason. It's not as fast as a collar, and a little cumbersome on a monopod, but definitely what I'd try first (and what I use with non-collared lenses).

The AF on the 100L is slower than the 135L and 70-200 II, and tends to hunt in dim light (it's an f/2.8 lens, but it's in Group C on the 1D X/5DIII - it doesn't activate any f/2.8 high precision points). Using the focus limiter helps, but it's not a total fix. If you depend on fast AF, it's not the best choice, IMO.
 
Upvote 0
#9
Upvote 0
#10
pwp said:
I have a 135 f/2, it's a nice sharp copy which needed +9 AFMA on all my bodies to become stellar. But I hardly use it, reaching more often for the 70-200 f/2.8isII.

Just now I realised why...no tripod collar. I shoot well over 50% portrait orientation, often on a monopod. If there was a tripod collar for the 135 f/2 I know I'd use it almost daily.

A quick web search including eBay revealed nothing...does anyone know if this item is exists?

-PW
Click to expand...

its a light lens why not just use an L bracket on your body?
thats what I do anyway
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Fbimages
Svalbard and Arctic pack ice, summer 2025
Replies
16
Views
987
ArdoSmith
A
LSXPhotog
RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM
Replies
75
Views
17K
PinholeR5
P
pwp
Tripod collar for 70-200 f/4is - Genuine vs eBay
Replies
14
Views
10K
iaind
iaind
pwp
Alternative to YN-622C for AF Assist
Replies
0
Views
4K
pwp
pwp
B
removing the tripod collar on the 70-200 f 2.8 II IS lens
Replies
21
Views
25K
slclick
slclick
Top Bottom
Home
Forums
Media
Menu