martti said:
.......An iPhone takes pretty darn good pictures if you really compose the scene, keep the camera stable and brush your photo up in one of the PP apps casually. A consumer-quality DSLR takes horrible pictures if you do not know how to compose, focus or expose the picture. Let alone if you cannot hold it in situations where it blinks because the exposure is too long for hand held.
Stop it, just stop already.
Your comparisons defy rationality.
You propose that a crap camera in the hands of a skilled photographer can take better photos than a fine camera in the hands of a photo rube. That's no way to make a valid comparison.
Better is camera A vs camera B, both in the same skilled hands.
Phone cam looses, every time and by a huge margin.
Two 100% crops below of the Moon. Both shot handheld, same operator.
1st was taken with a Samsung Galaxy 4S, a phone with better specs than an iPhone 6S, 31mm equivalent focal length, underexposed max possible as allowed by the phone, f/2.2, 1/15, ISO 100.
2nd taken with Canon 6D, 40mm pancake, f/6.3, 1/100, ISO 100.
S4
6D
One looks like a blob of light, one looks like the Moon.
Difference is the camera.
Phone cams are for Facebook.
Looky!
Some meals, some drunks, some cats, a squirrel!
You going to shoot a wedding with an iPhone?
---
martti said:
I make my postings with literate people in mind.
Since you've degenerated to ad hominem insults I'll point out that there's often a large gap between literacy and intelligence.
A brief review of your posts in this thread demonstrates a lack of the latter.
