Canon's tired old camera still doesn't leak. Ugh!!! Sony innovates and you get a built in canteen. If you've been shooting 4k it'll make you hot cocoa too.
Upvote
0
Don Haines said:The sony needs a hole in the bottom to let the water out....
camerone said:I don’t have experience with any of the really high end Canon bodies , but my 6D has held up magnificently to wet (and cold) weather magnificently (with weather-sealed lenses of course). Multiple times I’ve almost expected it to fail but it pulled through. Not sure I would trust a Sony though, even before seeing this video...
Don Haines said:The sony needs a hole in the bottom to let the water out....
I can remember (but didn't find it anymore) an Oly add spot where they took a camera (was it a E3?) under a shower.woodman411 said:This mirrors (no pun intended) my observations and experience with build quality: Canon > Nikon > Sony , no experience with Olympus.
woodman411 said:You can't rely on Sony when it's hot (overheating). You can't rely on Sony when it's wet (weather sealing). You can't rely on Sony for shooting stars (star eating). You can't rely on Sony for studio work (stopped-down focusing). What's next?
My comment would have been:Ryananthony said:I would have loved to see the comments here if canon was the only one who failed. ;D
Ryananthony said:I would have loved to see the comments here if canon was the only one who failed. ;D
mb66energy said:Maybe it has advantages to be conservative and innovate a little bit more slowly. I prefer real tools which usually are a little bit conservative and evolve with moderate speed.
This test shows who has reliable TOOLS and who not.
That is pretty much nonsense.Don Haines said:woodman411 said:ethermine said:No surprises there. They all produce fantastic images, but after watching one of my favorite adventure photographers Chris Burkard laugh about how he's destroyed yet another Sony camera while photographing near water, or rainy conditions, It's made me appreciate my Canon gear all the more for being able to survive all the torture I've subjected them to across the globe. Then again, I'd happily shoot, and I probably wouldn't worry much about my Sony gear getting destroyed if Sony gave me gear like candy.
It would bug me knowing I wouldn't be able to completely rely on my gear under those conditions, though.
You can't rely on Sony when it's hot (overheating). You can't rely on Sony when it's wet (weather sealing). You can't rely on Sony for shooting stars (star eating). You can't rely on Sony for studio work (stopped-down focusing). What's next?
You can't rely on Sony. PERIOD!