What’s a “realistic” lens that you’d like to see Canon make?

[McLeisa]

I would like

• RF 24mm f 1.2
  
  
• RF 24mm f1.8 macro
• RF 28mm f1.8 macro
• RF 35mm f1.8 macro (already exists)
• RF 50mm f1.8 macro
• RF 85mm f1.8 macro

 

[Antoine]

28mm 1.2 or 1.4

 

[Hector1970]

A 24-200mm F4 would be perfect
I suppose a 10-1000mm F1.0 is a bit unrealistic

 

[FramerMCB]

RF 50mm f1.4 STM with superior optical performance compared to either the EF 50mm f1.4 or the "nifty-fifty" f1.8 versions.

RF 135mm f2.8 IS 1:1 Macro

RF 150-500mm f4.0-f6.3 IS w/MFD of 20' - 22' (~6.1m - ~6.7m)

RF 14mm f1.8

EF 50mm f1.4L IS w/Max MSRP of $999USD

RF 100mm f1.4L IS (an option for portraits, and certain venues)

RF 100mm f1.8 STM IS

 

[Deleted member 7828]

If MILC cameras ever get fast enough to stop action:

How about a 100-300mm f2.8 lens? That would get close to approximating the FOV of a 70-200 on a crop-sensor camera, and I always appreciated that range. 200mm on FF can be a bit short at times

 

[Fran Decatta]

A 16/17-35/40mm f3.5-5.6 none L or F4 L both affordables, but with better IQ than the very old 17-40 L f4

 

[Policar]

EF-S 18mm f1.8 USM

Please.

 

[BeenThere]

RF 20-85 3.5-5.6 0.7 macro
Perfect lens for nature photography and probably quite possible to implement.

Would prefer an RF180 f4 macro.

 

[Viggo]

An RF version of the Zeiss 100 f2.0 mp, but as a f1,4 version. Not sure they could keep the same magnifying though, but except fringing and MF, I love that lens...

 

[ColinJR]

A fast f/2 or 1.8 24–50ish zoom that isn't huge in the way the 28–70 is. Bonus if it has IS.

Also, a line of affordable-ish 1.4 primes. And tilt-shifts!

 

[Aaron D]

OK, I'll take one each of these:

14 mm f/2.8 w/ filter front
17 mm TS really sharp and w/ filter front. And 17 is plenty wide!
24-50 mm TS Zoom f/ whatever
28 mm f/1.4 L Doesn't need to be 1.2! I could never afford it....
50 mm 1.4 L Compact, small and affordable.

 

[Aaron Lozano]

135 1.8L IS and 180mm or a 200mm 2.8L IS macro

 

[timmy_650]

First I want R mount lenses I can afford. I don't make money with photography, so I can't drop $2000 on A lens and no chance I can spend $6000+ for 3 of them.

My top lens is a 16-35 f2.8-4, Non L but still weather sealed. Small and light. Something that is great for hiking or travel lens to go with 70-200. Missing the 36-70 Focal range isn't that big of a deal or just bring a 50mm and your good. 16mm f2.8 is good for astro and that is pretty much the only time I care about f2.8. Then most of the time I am at f8.

I would also be happy with a replacement for 17-40 f4 for the R mount.

 

[dancan]

TS-R 4/16 mm
TS-R 2,8/35 mm
TS-R 2,8/50mm

 

[Martin K]

Continue reading...

35-135 F2.8L

 

[MDM@ canon rumors]

50 200 f4 or variabile , something light and short

 

[igorcoelho]

I love primes lens


I already have these news lenses and i love
24mm f2.8 IS
35mm f2 IS
100mm f2.8 IS MACRO


now i want to see these updated either in improved quality, the new canon design of the lenses, and the stabilizer 3/4 f / stops

18 mm f/2.8 IS
50mm f/1.4 IS or f/1.8 or f/2.8
85mm f/1.8 IS or f/2.8
135mm f/2 IS
200mm f/2.8 IS

PLEASE CANON
I BUY ALL OF THEM

 

[Deleted member 68328]

To me, no question asked :
EF 135mm f/2L IS USM

You can keep the current optical formula, just go all-in the AF and IS and keep the same size and weight (hence f/2 rather than f/1.8).

That would be awesome through the OVF of a future 5D Mark V (it's coming, riiiiiight?)

 

[igorcoelho]

To me, no question asked :
EF 135mm f/2L IS USM

You can keep the current optical formula, just go all-in the AF and IS and keep the same size and weight (hence f/2 rather than f/1.8).

That would be awesome through the OVF of a future 5D Mark V (it's coming, riiiiiight?)

keep the same size and weight...with IS I don't think they can do

 

[SpaceGhost]

I haven't switched to RF yet but this year is it.

I wish there was a RF 24-105mm f2.8L IS (and what I want most from RF). I love the f4 for an all around lens but for events, I'd love the faster speeds in a zoom.

Further, I'd also love an RF 24-135 f4L IS because the expanded range seems reasonable even though the RF 24-105f4IS is already a pretty sweet lens.