OMG that totally sailed right by me, LOL
Upvote
0
OMG that totally sailed right by me, LOL
I'm a little thick. It just means one can sit closer to a larger tv in a small room and not notice lines (old crt) or pixels. 2' from the screen? Yeah, okay. lol So there is an advantage to 8k in my imaginary videos I will take. I can get an 85" screen in a small room rather than having to sit 15' away from an old crt television with rabbit ears. https://www.crutchfield.com/S-0WSQQdOK2k9/learn/learningcenter/home/TV_placement.htmlOMG that totally sailed right by me, LOL
As a 5D mk 4 owner may I just say that I plan to continue using this camera for several years to come. Also I prefer the OVF to every EVF that I have used - although of course I have not tried the EVF on the R5 yet. The two other photographers i know who use 5D mark 4s feel much the same way. It does everything they need it to do so there is no compelling reason to change.Every single 5D Mk4 buyer I know is ready to jump, some
just want to wait for a couple of months for the first price
adjustment. None of them says to prefer OVF and mirror.
You might be surprised.
The average US TV size is 60" = optimum viewing distances as follows, 1080P 7.7ft, 4K 4ft, 8K 2ft
"Optimum viewing" in @jeffa4444 example has little to do with optimum viewing. The advantage is being able to use ever larger televisions in ever smaller rooms without taking an IQ hit. Saving for an 85" 4k now for what will be an awesome 10' viewing distance experience. An 85" 720 or 1080 that size and at that distance would not be as good. https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/by-size/size-to-distance-relationshipWe have a 65" and sit about 15' away. I've tried skootching up our couch a few inches a day to see if my wife notices we're getting closer, but she does.
Every. Single. Time.
Feng Shui is really messing with my optimum viewing experience.
"Optimum viewing" in @jeffa4444 example has little to do with optimum viewing. The advantage is being able to use ever larger televisions in ever smaller rooms without taking an IQ hit. Saving for an 85" 4k now for what will be an awesome 10' viewing distance experience. An 85" 720 or 1080 that size and at that distance would not be as good. https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/by-size/size-to-distance-relationship
Yeah, I knew you were just joshing. I have a little 1080p 38" screen right now. I'm in a tiny apartment so I don't really know where I'd put something bigger.Oh, yes. I was just being funny. Our 65" looks great at all resolutions... But real 4K content is pretty amazing.
I think your trying to teach me to suck eggs! Were renting Red 8K cameras
I think your trying to teach me to suck eggs! We rent Red 8K cameras Im well aware as Ive stated that oversampling / pan & scan are available to those that chose to shoot full 8K (which often they dont). My point was outputting 8K as a viewable image is impractical unless you know something I dont?
Its not irrelevant when TV companies are trying to sell consumers 8K TVs without them understanding the limitations, its not irrelevant when movie theatres will not be able to handle 8K content yet producers are being told they are future proofing.
Refresh rates, and wider color gamut are worthwhile investments, 8K origination for oversampling but people need to understand the physical limitations of the human eye and viewing distances. Security applications by comparison to domestic is a much smaller market and even then it only relates to using specific enhancing technology most ordinary people would not need.
Irrelevant to who? Yours is one opinion and no one person is an expert.Talking about the impracticality of output devices when discussing 8K for capture devices is irrelevant, unless the resolution of the output device exceeds the resolution of the capture device.
The reality is apart from wealthier families most homes could not cope with an 85" TV unless it was like wallpaper they are simply too small. In Europe homes are way smaller than the US and in Asia smaller still."Optimum viewing" in @jeffa4444 example has little to do with optimum viewing. The advantage is being able to use ever larger televisions in ever smaller rooms without taking an IQ hit. Saving for an 85" 4k now for what will be an awesome 10' viewing distance experience. An 85" 720 or 1080 that size and at that distance would not be as good. https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/by-size/size-to-distance-relationship
That's the RP; it's the mirrorless type Rebel line. I predict that all of the RF camera will be FF sensor, per "consolidation" theme that was reported by the Canon rep couple yrs ago.What happened to the $800 RF camera?
Irrelevant to who? Yours is one opinion and no one person is an expert.