What the 40mm Pancake looks like on a 5D3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sep 13, 2011
898
206
10,628
It focuses at 4 inches from the subject.

pancake.jpg
 
briansquibb said:
Wocka - mine arrives on Monday and will be going on the 1DS3 - you tried that yet?

I literally picked it up on the way to a wedding in Cambridge. I might have something to say on it tomorrow.

Nice lens though, I'd like to see an 80mm macro 2.8 too.

I'm no longer considering mirrorless now that my 5D3 will fit into a jacket pocket.
 
Upvote 0
spinworkxroy said:
I'm getting mine today and yes i too am using it primarily as a body cap....at least it's a functioning body cap when i need it fast and not have to struggle with changing lenses.

I guess this body cap will not cost "light leak". Now I know why Canon releases 40mm pankcake ;D ;D ;D
 
Upvote 0
gmrza said:
wockawocka said:
It focuses at 4 inches from the subject.

pancake.jpg

Can you confirm that it focuses 10cm from the subject? The specs say 30cm.

30 cm/300 mm is from focal plane. Let's crunch some numbers:
Code:
EF Flange-back distance: 44 mm
Lens length            : 27 mm
Total                  : 71 mm
Take 71 mm from 300 mm and you have 229 mm/~23 cm (approx.) from the end of the lens.
Not too close to 10 cm, but who brings ruler on a photo outing anyway? ;D
 
Upvote 0
Does anyone by any chance have used both the Canon and Voigtlander 40 pancakes?

I own the latter, and I'm interested to know if it's worth the money. I still think the 50/1.8 is a better option if I needed something cheap and handy.
 
Upvote 0
Joellll said:
... I still think the 50/1.8 is a better option if I needed something cheap and handy.

That's what I was thinking. Half the price, more than a stop faster, 40mm vs 50mm (thats not too different), and not that much longer than the pancake (but will the body+50 fit in my pocket?).

But I don't really have a use for it right now. And my "landscape kit" came this week and really pounded the VISA card!
 
Upvote 0
Here it is on my 1DS3 - pretty wide on FF. I would say it would be good for indoors etc

Impressions:

1. It isn't silent, but quieter than the 50 f/1.4
2. Quicker and more accurate AF then the 50 f/1.4 - but not fast like, say the 70-200 f/2.8 II
3. It is tiny - in comparison to the 50 f/1.4 the end of the 40 is before the focussing ring of the 50

1DS3 + 40 taken with 1D4 + 50f/1.4
1D4 + 50 taken with 1DS3 + 40
 

Attachments

  • B09G7886.JPG
    B09G7886.JPG
    126 KB · Views: 2,705
  • B09G7888.JPG
    B09G7888.JPG
    70.6 KB · Views: 1,652
  • IMG_9388.JPG
    IMG_9388.JPG
    91.2 KB · Views: 1,718
Upvote 0
briansquibb said:
Here it is on my 1DS3 - pretty wide on FF. I would say it would be good for indoors etc

Damn, you beat me to it.
Gonna put a roll of 400iso B+W film in on the weekend and have some street-shooting fun!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6871brcs1200x800.JPG
    IMG_6871brcs1200x800.JPG
    832.3 KB · Views: 1,768
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.