I have an older 24-105mm f/4 L IS (manufactured March 2006, according to the date code). I used it extensively on my 5D over the course of several years, and on my last trip with it in the winter of 2010 the IS mechanism started having problems, it would flutter and buzz intermittently and ceased to do any stabilization.
I contacted a local repair shop of good repute and had them replace the IS mechanism. It was a $400 repair once tax was added on. When I got the lens back I did a cursory test and confirmed the IS was fixed and working well. But before I could really give the lens a work out, a family crisis came up, and everything got put on hold for a couple of years....
Fast forward to the present and I am getting back to my photography. I've acquired a 6D to replace my 5D, and having done some shooting, it's clear that my trusty 24-105mm is not up to snuff. This afternoon I did some controlled tests on a tripod, focusing manually with live view so as to eliminate any AF variables. At f/4.0 the lens is very blurry even in the center (all focal lengths). It gets better at f/5.6, further improvement but not as dramatic at f/8.0, and f/11 is uniformly the best. I remember previously on my 5D there was a little bit of softness wide open, but it was not as bad as it is now. I suppose the higher resolution of the 6D is mercilessly revealing something the 5D couldn't resolve, but my other lenses are working very nicely on the 6D.
I am thinking that some critical aspect of the lens optics got messed up at the repair shop. The repair work is far out of warranty, and I don't want to throw any more money at this lens unless it is a sure thing. Recent postings in Roger Cicala's blog have me thinking, there is no such thing as a sure thing, when it comes to lens repair. So I'm debating what to do. I really like the 24-105mm zoom range and have got to have IS. The only direct alternative seems to be the new Sigma 24-105mm, but it's not weather-sealed. I often shoot in dusty conditions so I am skeptical of getting that lens. The Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 VC looks interesting but there's a lot of missing millimeters from 70 to 105! I am actually thinking of buying one of the "white box" 24-105mm lenses that are available for about $700. (And then do what with the old lens? I can't sell it in good conscience.)
I am wondering what some of you folks would do in this situation?
I contacted a local repair shop of good repute and had them replace the IS mechanism. It was a $400 repair once tax was added on. When I got the lens back I did a cursory test and confirmed the IS was fixed and working well. But before I could really give the lens a work out, a family crisis came up, and everything got put on hold for a couple of years....
Fast forward to the present and I am getting back to my photography. I've acquired a 6D to replace my 5D, and having done some shooting, it's clear that my trusty 24-105mm is not up to snuff. This afternoon I did some controlled tests on a tripod, focusing manually with live view so as to eliminate any AF variables. At f/4.0 the lens is very blurry even in the center (all focal lengths). It gets better at f/5.6, further improvement but not as dramatic at f/8.0, and f/11 is uniformly the best. I remember previously on my 5D there was a little bit of softness wide open, but it was not as bad as it is now. I suppose the higher resolution of the 6D is mercilessly revealing something the 5D couldn't resolve, but my other lenses are working very nicely on the 6D.
I am thinking that some critical aspect of the lens optics got messed up at the repair shop. The repair work is far out of warranty, and I don't want to throw any more money at this lens unless it is a sure thing. Recent postings in Roger Cicala's blog have me thinking, there is no such thing as a sure thing, when it comes to lens repair. So I'm debating what to do. I really like the 24-105mm zoom range and have got to have IS. The only direct alternative seems to be the new Sigma 24-105mm, but it's not weather-sealed. I often shoot in dusty conditions so I am skeptical of getting that lens. The Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 VC looks interesting but there's a lot of missing millimeters from 70 to 105! I am actually thinking of buying one of the "white box" 24-105mm lenses that are available for about $700. (And then do what with the old lens? I can't sell it in good conscience.)
I am wondering what some of you folks would do in this situation?