What's a good computer monitor?

cayenne

CR Pro
Mar 28, 2012
2,868
796
Hi all,

Ok, I saved my nickles and dimes for a couple years and I got a new workstation...a Mac Pro.

So far I"m loving it......and I'm looking next for a good computer monitor.
I can't afford the Apple offering any time soon so, wondering what other options are out there.

I'll be doing mostly stills, but also video too.....

My current monitor, Dell U2711...was pretty decent, bang for the buck in its day, but I think it is starting to age fade on me....

I like 27" at least, maybe larger....something that will hold calibration, etc.

Any recommendations out there what to look at?


Thank you in advance,

cayenne
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Jan 29, 2011
10,675
6,121
BENQ SW321C, for stills orientated work plus some video you have to spend a lot more money to beat it. Native USB-C for the Mac Pro, hardware calibration, 16 bit LUT's, 10 bit output, comes with test certificates of standardization and performance to Delta E ≤ 2, customizable puck for easy control, heck you can even do fancy stuff like split screen in different color spaces.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0

Maximilian

The dark side - I've been there
CR Pro
Nov 7, 2013
5,664
8,492
Germany
Hi Guys!

I'd like to jump in into cayennes question.

What would you recommend, if I'd add the following constraints/limitations:
  • 27" is big enough
  • full HD is good enough
  • calibration tool like spyder pro is already there
  • budget is limited to 500-600 bucks, and cheaper would be nice, too
Thanks in advance for answers on this.
 
Upvote 0

mkamelg

EOS R6 Mark II
Feb 1, 2015
73
42
Poland
www.flickr.com
Hi all,

Ok, I saved my nickles and dimes for a couple years and I got a new workstation...a Mac Pro.

So far I"m loving it......and I'm looking next for a good computer monitor.
I can't afford the Apple offering any time soon so, wondering what other options are out there.

I'll be doing mostly stills, but also video too.....

My current monitor, Dell U2711...was pretty decent, bang for the buck in its day, but I think it is starting to age fade on me....

I like 27" at least, maybe larger....something that will hold calibration, etc.

Any recommendations out there what to look at?


Thank you in advance,

cayenne

Best 4K and 5K Displays for Mac – Cost-Effective Alternatives to the Apple Thunderbolt Display

5K's Dell UP2715K and Philips 275P4VYKEB are discontinued. As for the other models, before potential buying check opinions about them e.g. on Amazon.

If you are looking for monitors for general applications, photography and graphics, then read (or just look at monitor list) this annually updated article published on the Polish forum dedicated to the subjects on creating, registering and processing the image:


Monitors with the note -CT and COLOR are versions available only on Polish market. What is the difference between them and the factory models?


Personally I use the 27" Asus PA279Q monitor (for what I remember since 2014), connected to the Mac mini (Late 2012).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
Jan 29, 2011
10,675
6,121
Hi Guys!

I'd like to jump in into cayennes question.

What would you recommend, if I'd add the following constraints/limitations:
  • 27" is big enough
  • full HD is good enough
  • calibration tool like spyder pro is already there
  • budget is limited to 500-600 bucks, and cheaper would be nice, too
Thanks in advance for answers on this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0

cayenne

CR Pro
Mar 28, 2012
2,868
796
BENQ SW321C, for stills orientated work plus some video you have to spend a lot more money to beat it. Native USB-C for the Mac Pro, hardware calibration, 16 bit LUT's, 10 bit output, comes with test certificates of standardization and performance to Delta E ≤ 2, customizable puck for easy control, heck you can even do fancy stuff like split screen in different color spaces.



Oh wow...that looks like a monster on first glance....right up my alley.

I'll start researching a bit...but wow, that looks good!!

Thank you,

C
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0

Bert63

What’s in da box?
CR Pro
Dec 3, 2017
1,072
2,335
60
I bought a 32" 4K BenQ PD3200U and am really pleased with it for the price. I owned a BenQ 20" from way back and was always impressed with it, again for the price. It compared well to my Samsung 24", which I wasn't too impressed with.

Jack


Ha! I just bought this same monitor over the winter and love it...

I have it connected between a Mac Mini and my main desktop and it's a fantastic piece of equipment.

I have 27" BenQs on either side of it.. :)
 
Upvote 0
Oct 3, 2015
98
103
one thing to consider with 10bit + output that sometimes gets overlooked due to how marketing represents things is how you're feeding the monitor as most consumer level gpu's aimed at gaming folks wont manage 10bit (in none full screen applications ie. games) so you'll need workstation card like nvidia quadro or fire pro/radeon pro. You may get some slight benefit to gradients in theory with higher bit internal LUTs and true 10bit or more panel vs regular 8 bit panels (or 6+frc) but it won't be true benefit and weak link in an otherwise 10bit end to end workflow.

I should clarify I'm talking about real time high bit depth workflows, I know a few black magic cinema cards allow via exporting but you can't work real time that way thus is limiting, at least I've never found a way so I'd happy to be proven wrong if someone can tell me a way around it. There may be others but only familiar with BMC). If you're not after colour critical design and photo work or need to work in none sRGB spaces such as aRGB and DCI P3 etc workflows there are plenty of accurate enough for most use (including pro) panels out there. Just thought I'd mention it in case.
 
Upvote 0
one thing to consider with 10bit + output that sometimes gets overlooked due to how marketing represents things is how you're feeding the monitor as most consumer level gpu's aimed at gaming folks wont manage 10bit (in none full screen applications ie. games) so you'll need workstation card like nvidia quadro or fire pro/radeon pro. You may get some slight benefit to gradients in theory with higher bit internal LUTs and true 10bit or more panel vs regular 8 bit panels (or 6+frc) but it won't be true benefit and weak link in an otherwise 10bit end to end workflow.

I should clarify I'm talking about real time high bit depth workflows, I know a few black magic cinema cards allow via exporting but you can't work real time that way thus is limiting, at least I've never found a way so I'd happy to be proven wrong if someone can tell me a way around it. There may be others but only familiar with BMC). If you're not after colour critical design and photo work or need to work in none sRGB spaces such as aRGB and DCI P3 etc workflows there are plenty of accurate enough for most use (including pro) panels out there. Just thought I'd mention it in case.

I am not sure about AMD but as far as I know Nvidia has supported 10-bit output on geforce cards in non full screen applications for a while now. You just need to use their studio driver instead of the game ready driver.I unfortunately don't have a 10-bit display to actually test this with though.

 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
Oct 3, 2015
98
103
I am not sure about AMD but as far as I know Nvidia has supported 10-bit output on geforce cards in non full screen applications for a while now. You just need to use their studio driver instead of the game ready driver.I unfortunately don't have a 10-bit display to actually test this with though.

Awesome and much appreciated, I didn't know about that and must have completely missed the change.
 
Upvote 0
Hi Guys!

I'd like to jump in into cayennes question.

What would you recommend, if I'd add the following constraints/limitations:
  • 27" is big enough
  • full HD is good enough
  • calibration tool like spyder pro is already there
  • budget is limited to 500-600 bucks, and cheaper would be nice, too
Thanks in advance for answers on this.
Full HD is not good enough. On a 26" 1900x1200 monitor, I couldn't easily tell the difference between my sigma art 35mm and my canon 35mm f2. I sold my Sigma and kept the Canon. Once I upgraded to a 5k display, I strongly regret selling my sigma. The difference was very noticeable. I can definitely recommend against the LG 5k on Apple.com. It is the worst purchase of my life...expensive, no audio output, can't work with any non-thunderbolt GPU.

I'd recommend a 32" 4k display. Make sure it supports multiple display inputs and audio out. USB-C is very much worth it because it can charge your laptop and allow 1-cable access. I don't think 5k makes a noticeable difference in image quality, but it will noticeably impact your performance and limit your options. If you're a laptop user, you have far superior eGPU options if your monitor has non-Thunderbolt/USB-C inputs (DisplayPort or HDMI).

Also, keep in mind, larger display means more strain on your computer. Lightroom Classic is painful to use on any macbook (I have the 2019 now with the best GPU/CPU and it's tolerable, but not pleasant) with 5k.

For Windows desktops, they have superior hardware options, so this is not an issue, but for Mac Users, save some money for a machine upgrade after you decide it's not worth it to wait 10 seconds for Lightroom to switch from 1 photo to another (it can take that long on a top of the line 2016 Thunderbolt 3 macbook connected to the 5k display).
 
Upvote 0
Awesome and much appreciated, I didn't know about that and must have completely missed the change.

It was done because the HDR testing for Windows 10 required it and because creatives, who by and large do not use Quadro cards anymore and use the high-end gaming cards due to their superior performance and price ratio, needed it to use the new high-end pro displays for video color-correction and grading work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
Oct 3, 2015
98
103
It was done because the HDR testing for Windows 10 required it and because creatives, who by and large do not use Quadro cards anymore and use the high-end gaming cards due to their superior performance and price ratio, needed it to use the new high-end pro displays for video color-correction and grading work.
Yeah I'm in that camp but totally missed the support and on find price to performance they work better for me for speed of workflow with premier and aftereffects in particular vs the lower end workstation cards. I use it hooked to 10bit panel albeit not wide gamut one although it'd be nice doing semi critical colour work although accuracy matters more to me than wider spaces. To get the same performance on the quadro line cost more than it was worth to me and there is other parts of my chain I'd rather spend it on before that.
 
Upvote 0
D

Deleted member 381342

Guest
I am not sure about AMD but as far as I know Nvidia has supported 10-bit output on geforce cards in non full screen applications for a while now. You just need to use their studio driver instead of the game ready driver.I unfortunately don't have a 10-bit display to actually test this with though.


AMD supported 30 bit colour for quite a while. Nvidia for a long time had made it only available to the Quadro line, it is fantastic that it is now just a driver change.
 
Upvote 0
Hi all,

Ok, I saved my nickles and dimes for a couple years and I got a new workstation...a Mac Pro.

So far I"m loving it......and I'm looking next for a good computer monitor.
I can't afford the Apple offering any time soon so, wondering what other options are out there.

I'll be doing mostly stills, but also video too.....

My current monitor, Dell U2711...was pretty decent, bang for the buck in its day, but I think it is starting to age fade on me....

I like 27" at least, maybe larger....something that will hold calibration, etc.

Any recommendations out there what to look at?


Thank you in advance,

cayenne

If you suffer from eye strain, look for monitors that have built-in light filter software, especially filters that are specifically designed for easing eye problems. These filters are designed to block more blue light, which is the part of the spectrum that affects our eyes the most and is responsible for most eye strain problems. However, you can also download eye filter software apps for any type of monitor you get.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0

cayenne

CR Pro
Mar 28, 2012
2,868
796
If you suffer from eye strain, look for monitors that have built-in light filter software, especially filters that are specifically designed for easing eye problems. These filters are designed to block more blue light, which is the part of the spectrum that affects our eyes the most and is responsible for most eye strain problems. However, you can also download eye filter software apps for any type of monitor you get.

Interesting!!

Thank you!!

C
 
Upvote 0