Which Canon Full Frame Camera is For You?
- Thread starter Canon Rumors
- Start date
privatebydesign said:
I use a 6D as well as a six year old 5DII. The high ISO capability of the 6D is astonishing. I'm attaching a hand held shot of the very dark interior of Southwell Minster, taken at ISO 3,200. However if you make sure that there is zero noise reduction during the raw conversion the data is not so pretty. Seems the 6D files respond to noise reduction better than the 5DII.
Canon is one of the few companies that allow the raw to be converted honestly, and this can cause problems with reviews if the reviewer doesn't state clearly that the Canon is unadulterated compared with the opposition. If the reviewers keep at it Canon will undoubtedly respond eventually by doctoring the raw.
At low ISO I have found that the 6D and 5DII are identical. At first I thought that the 6D had better tonal graduation but this only applies to OOC jpegs, which have more 'smoothing'; definitely better camera jpegs though. Because of the fact I am usually working at low ISO I prefer to use the 5DII, I find the ergonomics and feel of the tangible controls on the 6D to be annoying after the 5DII. A iD series user could have said the same thing about the 5 series I and II but the 5III does seem to have lifted its standard to 1 series in this respect.
Attachments
Upvote
0
privatebydesign said:
+2 I love my 1Ds3 and it has paid for itself many times over without a single problem. Perhaps this year, I'll buy another used one or maybe a used 1Dx.
Upvote
0
User interface is an issue.
It seems Canon has settled on two user interfaces - the consumer version (60D, 70D, 6D) and the pro version (5DIII, 7DII). I'm ignoring the 1 series.
I'm wondering if that will stick or if the next generation of the consumer series (70D replacement, 6D replacement) will have most of the pro user interface minus the parts that don't apply due to a reduced feature set.
Another option might be to make the 6D replacement the replacement for the 5DIII ("upmarket") at a lower price than the 5DIII but a higher price than the 6D, and make the 5DIV the high-pixel-count camera.
I wish Canon would just say what they are doing so I could plan what I'm doing. All the secrecy is annoying especially when companies like Intel and Microsoft telegraph their plans years ahead of time.
It seems Canon has settled on two user interfaces - the consumer version (60D, 70D, 6D) and the pro version (5DIII, 7DII). I'm ignoring the 1 series.
I'm wondering if that will stick or if the next generation of the consumer series (70D replacement, 6D replacement) will have most of the pro user interface minus the parts that don't apply due to a reduced feature set.
Another option might be to make the 6D replacement the replacement for the 5DIII ("upmarket") at a lower price than the 5DIII but a higher price than the 6D, and make the 5DIV the high-pixel-count camera.
I wish Canon would just say what they are doing so I could plan what I'm doing. All the secrecy is annoying especially when companies like Intel and Microsoft telegraph their plans years ahead of time.
Upvote
0
You are a very well balanced person. You must have found the cure somewhere, please share. You will make a lot of wives happy around here.slclick said:
I am planning on doing the same thing on the X if I can resist. GAS is tough.
Upvote
0
Besisika said:
Well, I like to think of myself as a creative who enjoys nice gear but isn't driven by it. The 5D3 is more than enough camera for me. My results are leaving me nothing to desire body wise and I'm the one that needs to improve not the mechanism.
Upvote
0
vscd said:
You can, but it takes a lot more preparation. It isn't nearly as convenient as, when you suddenly realize you'd like to get a shot from over people's heads, being able to just hit the live view button, tilt your screen, lift the camera, and press the shutter release button on the bottom of your grip. Yeah, I can usually do a decent job without seeing what I'm doing, but it sometimes takes two or three shots, where one would suffice if I had an articulating live view screen.
In much the same way, I was able to use Wi-Fi to do remote shooting with my 6D when I accidentally left my wireless remote at my parents' house this past Thanksgiving. It worked, but not nearly as well as the remote trigger (in part because the 6D gives no visual indication when you take a picture remotely, and in part because the app exhibits fairly high latency when you're fifty feet from the camera, because Wi-Fi speed falls off quickly as the distance increases, and the app indicates that you took a photo by updating the thumbnail, which requires it to receive the photo first).
In other words, the fact that you can do something with a particular tool doesn't make it the best tool for the job. As far as I'm concerned, as long as the articulating screens are robust enough and are sufficiently water sealed, there's no downside to having that functionality. If you don't want to use it, you just don't use it. For that matter, if they design it correctly, there's a big upside; assuming the screen can do a full 180 degree vertical rotation and can be folded fully into the body in either position, you can latch it into the body with the screen facing inwards to protect it during transport.
Upvote
0
I have had my 6D for about a year and a half and do not regret my decision for one second. As much as I often curse Canon for intentionally crippling the autofocus performance of the 6D, I will probably hold onto it for at least another 3 years unless there is a Sony a7s type jump in ISO performance. I also wish the Fro would have mentioned how the 6D is very very good in low light situations, especially nightscapes. The fact that you are getting 5D MkIII image quality for half gives it a lot of value. Until there is a significant jump in quality, my money will be going to lenses, especially those 1.4 primes.
Attachments
Upvote
0
ashmadux
Art Director, Visual Artist, Freelance Photography
6d
+non-mushy directional pad (who designed that mess?)
+better sharpness (RAW pictures are kinda softee)
+The Af of even an old rebel
/ keep the spectacular iso performance
= 6d2 must have
IMHO all the 6d needs is the Af of even a rebel and it will be a 50% better camera. The body has a nice feel to it, perfectly weights to mid-telephoto primes, and with a grip the handling is sublime.
+non-mushy directional pad (who designed that mess?)
+better sharpness (RAW pictures are kinda softee)
+The Af of even an old rebel
/ keep the spectacular iso performance
= 6d2 must have
IMHO all the 6d needs is the Af of even a rebel and it will be a 50% better camera. The body has a nice feel to it, perfectly weights to mid-telephoto primes, and with a grip the handling is sublime.
Upvote
0
The 6D was right for me. I just wanted the sensor, I didn't need fancy AF for landscapes and astrophotography, The money I saved went toward a clean used copy of the Zeiss 21mm f/2.8 ZE. If Canon comes up with a sensor equivalent to the sensor in the D810, I will upgrade. The action (birding, wildlife) camera will be the 7D2, an upgrade from the 60D. I don't do video.
Upvote
0
AshtonNekolah
Time doesn't wait, Shoot Like It's Your Last.
privatebydesign said:
same here man, i use a 5D mk II and i can say im very happy with it just like the first day i got it. I know newer bodies does help but, not that much especially when your one with your camera.
Upvote
0
AshtonNekolah said:
I think the biggest problem for all camera companies is output IQ maturity, sure one company has better absolute metrics than another, but they are all within spitting distance of each other, so for people who are primarily concerned with output, ie, taking pictures rather than having a photography hobby (and there is nothing wrong with either), there really is very little incentive to buy newer bodies.
Upvote
0
Sigh... Unfortunately it's not available on Windows Phones :-(
But I do agree, I would rather use the EOS remote for those angled shots.
Upvote
0
Similar threads
