Now you did it. You injected steroids to a dyingLikely will be worse at stills than a a7r4, specially DR. If all you do is stills, that's the exciting camera to get
Upvote
0
Now you did it. You injected steroids to a dyingLikely will be worse at stills than a a7r4, specially DR. If all you do is stills, that's the exciting camera to get
dunno where you seeing those figures as last time i checked, some sony APSC cameras beat every single canon full frame on dynamic range. Even the old nikon 7200 beats full frame canons on dynamic range. Also regarding ISO, youre wrong. 7 out of the top8 full frame ISO performers are sony, and 4 out of the top8 have over 40MP, (and one of them is a sony). the one that isnt a sony is the S1R, which is also like 47MP.
with 8k dci raw, its clear to have AT LEAST 45MP, it can be more.It's not 100% clear it'll have 45mp sensor. It's very likely but not 100% clear.
Well that depends on where you get your figures from.dunno where you seeing those figures as last time i checked, some sony APSC cameras beat every single canon full frame on dynamic range. Even the old nikon 7200 beats full frame canons on dynamic range. Also regarding ISO, youre wrong. 7 out of the top8 full frame ISO performers are sony, and 4 out of the top8 have over 40MP, (and one of them is a sony). the one that isnt a sony is the S1R, which is also like 47MP.
That whole "less MP is better for HIGH iso" is mainly a myth based on how cameras VIDEO performance used to line skip on higher MP sensors (like the A7R2/A7II line skips , while the A7S2 and A7III read the whole sensor)
the 2 best performing Canons on DR are the 5div and R with around 13.6 DR, most sonys have 14.5-14.8 stops DR.
yeah charts that say nikons and sony to have 10 stops dynamic range... plenty of independent tests show results on 14-15 stops, That website makes no senseWell that depends on where you get your figures from.
https://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/PDR.htm#Canon EOS 1D X Mark III,Nikon D7200,Sony ILCE-6600,Sony ILCE-9M2
with 8k dci raw, its clear to have AT LEAST 45MP, it can be more.
You clearly don’t understand what the graphs are or what the measurements are so there is no point in starting all that up again. Suffice to say anybody that thinks they are getting 14-15 stops of dr out of any crop sensor camera is drinking somebody else’s cool aid, enjoy it but it isn’t the truth.yeah charts that say nikons and sony to have 10 stops dynamic range... plenty of independent tests show results on 14-15 stops, That website makes no sense
Not to mention that scores THE SAME CAMERA 2 stops worse when in crop, when in fact images cropped have the exact same DR, they are just cropped, highlights/shadows dont clip faster by goingcrop
Sensor size doesnt affect dynamic range.You clearly don’t understand what the graphs are or what the measurements are so there is no point in starting all that up again. Suffice to say anybody that thinks they are getting 14-15 stops of dr out of any crop sensor camera is drinking somebody else’s cool aid, enjoy it but it isn’t the truth.
No but if you don’t normalize output then you are not comparing the IQ from different sized sensors, and that is what we actually want to do with cameras. Go back and read the last five or so years threads about this, it really has been done to death.Sensor size doesnt affect dynamic range.
Sensor size doesnt affect dynamic range.
No but if you don’t normalize output then you are not comparing the IQ from different sized sensors, and that is what we actually want to do with cameras. Go back and read the last five or so years threads about this, it really has been done to death.
- Optically with all else equal typically the native lens will yield the highest quality (faster AF, better communication between lens and camera, native lenses are typically optically superior than adapted ones)
i was warned though. Canon fanboys cannot accept that their camera is worse at some things than the competition. I though it was BS, but i see that is not. Every brand has them, but obviously canon users are more hardcore. I even seen reviews on youtube with the same ppl that trashed the sony for only having 1 sd card only, suddenly "its not an issue" when the R comes out. Fanboys all the way. I leave you to it.New guy. Probable Sony troll.
This is at least somewhat a non-sequitur. An EF lens with the RF adapter is no worse optically than the EF lens native.
But, you're probably trying to compare the EF lens with an adapter (or for that matter, without one, since the adapter makes no optical difference) to an RF lens.
That of course may make a difference, but it's hard to say whether the RF is inherently optically superior to an EF + adapter, because the lenses themselves aren't identical; the RF lenses tend to be better constructed and designed in the first place (they are newer designs and much more expensive, presumably correlating with optical quality), and it has little to do with the mount. And the adapter itself does NOTHING optically to the lens.
So the adapter isn't the issue here. It won't do anything to make an EF lens optically/performance worse than it would be on an EF mount. If your real objection is that you just don't want to put EF-quality glass on an RF body...that's fine, but I have to wonder why you've been satisfied with EF optics on an EF body otherwise, and again...it's not the adapter's fault.
(Note: I don't address your other reasons, which at least make some degree of sense to me--I personally think you're overblowing the issues there, but that's really a personal judgment call, and you've made your judgment. It's just that this one reason for disliking adapters--a belief that EF+Adapter is optically/technically inferior to the RF--simply makes no sense to me because such is not the fault of the adapter.)
So... you sign up to a Canon rumors site a week ago, to post about how inferior to Sony cameras Canon's bodies are? Canon bodies whose full specs (let alone actual real world use) are not publicly known? And everyone else is the fanboy? Got it...i was warned though. Canon fanboys cannot accept that their camera is worse at some things than the competition. I though it was BS, but i see that is not. Every brand has them, but obviously canon users are more hardcore. I even seen reviews on youtube with the same ppl that trashed the sony for only having 1 sd card only, suddenly "its not an issue" when the R comes out. Fanboys all the way. I leave you to it.
If you need two card slots you need two card slots, I have shot professionally since 1978 and never needed them, but I am in the minority here on that issue.i was warned though. Canon fanboys cannot accept that their camera is worse at some things than the competition. I though it was BS, but i see that is not. Every brand has them, but obviously canon users are more hardcore. I even seen reviews on youtube with the same ppl that trashed the sony for only having 1 sd card only, suddenly "its not an issue" when the R comes out. Fanboys all the way. I leave you to it.
i was warned though. Canon fanboys cannot accept that their camera is worse at some things than the competition. I though it was BS, but i see that is not. Every brand has them, but obviously canon users are more hardcore. I even seen reviews on youtube with the same ppl that trashed the sony for only having 1 sd card only, suddenly "its not an issue" when the R comes out. Fanboys all the way. I leave you to it.
Better colour depth. As in 16bit colour on Sony or something?its a better sensor. whatever ergonomics, terrible menus and so on. the final image, its better on the sony, more likely to be taken on time/in focus, better DR/ISO/Colour depth etc. But i understand this is a canon forum and fanboys gonna be offended and start going on about colour science.
If you need two card slots you need two card slots, I have shot professionally since 1978 and never needed them, but I am in the minority here on that issue.