Zhongyi Optics has launched the Mitakon APO 200mm f/4 Macro 1X for the RF mpunt, as well as other full-frame mirrorless mounts. Mitakon APO 200mm f/4 Macro 1X Specifications:
See full article...
See full article...
Huh? What are you talking about?There have been many false dawns for RF third-party lenses thus far. When the Samyang RF lenses were introduced, I thought that was the start of a concerted RF third-party lenses build-up, but that lost steam quickly. Now that Sigma seems to be signalling that they would be introducing RF mount lenses, would this announcement be finally kicking-off the party?
Huh? What are you talking about?…. I have pretty strong doubts that it is actually "approved."
After 35 years as a loyal Canon user, I never been so disappointed with the brand. I never bought 3rd party lenses, but now I need them more then ever for the R system and they are playing bullies by restricting 3rd party manufacturers.
As a professional photographer I am of the view that Canon killed off the EF system prematurely. I’m desperate for a 5D MkV with EF mount
Not tempted by the RF 70-200 2.8? I love my EF version image quality, but I am not so enthusiastic about its size and weight ....Best lenses for R cameras are EF lenses, there's no doubt.
No, Zhongyi/Mitakon is one of several manufacturers who have been doing manual lenses in RF mount for a while. Canon only stomped on the manufacturers doing electronically-coupled lenses or adapters, not the ones doing bare metal mounts.There have been many false dawns for RF third-party lenses thus far. When the Samyang RF lenses were introduced, I thought that was the start of a concerted RF third-party lenses build-up, but that lost steam quickly. Now that Sigma seems to be signalling that they would be introducing RF mount lenses, would this announcement be finally kicking-off the party?
Indeed, AF is important, especially for these 0.95 lenses.This is non news again. If it aint AF, forget it.
I can only partly agree with what you said about AF and macro lenses. Quite often, manual focusing is the best choice.Indeed, AF is important, especially for these 0.95 lenses.
However, for macro, it is not that important to me. To reduce the cost, i can leave with it. The thing that worries me is those manual lenses that cost as much as lenses with AF.
Totally true!I can only partly agree with what you said about AF and macro lenses. Quite often, manual focusing is the best choice.
But what if you need real quick focusing? Think of a butterfly, for instance. A longer focal macro lens is ideally suited for such shots, but not a manually focusing one.
I often use my EF 180 manually for macros, but also use it as a tele lens for non macro pictures, exclusively with AF!
Not tempted by the RF 70-200 2.8? I love my EF version image quality, but I am not so enthusiastic about its size and weight ....
Not false dawns. In China, Yongnuo already re-start their selling of RF 85mm f1.8, and on Taobao you can get the RF 35mm f2(The one same as E mount).There have been many false dawns for RF third-party lenses thus far. When the Samyang RF lenses were introduced, I thought that was the start of a concerted RF third-party lenses build-up, but that lost steam quickly. Now that Sigma seems to be signalling that they would be introducing RF mount lenses, would this announcement be finally kicking-off the party?
I am a Canon user since 2019 (M50). Recently, I purchased Canon R10. I am really disappointed as well. I need third-party lenses as well as more RF-S Canon lenses.After 35 years as a loyal Canon user, I never been so disappointed with the brand. I never bought 3rd party lenses, but now I need them more then ever for the R system and they are playing bullies by restricting 3rd party manufacturers.
As a professional photographer I am of the view that Canon killed off the EF system prematurely. I’m desperate for a 5D MkV with EF mount
The new 100mm RF macro is an excellent lens based upon my experience of using it.As much as I hate the new 100mm RF macro, this is not what I’m after. I still want AF and IS.
I prefer the EF 100mm macro version without the soft focus BS as it also has a longer distance between subject and front element at close focus and 1:1.
I do not think third-party lenses ever stopped selling in China.Not false dawns. In China, Yongnuo already re-start their selling of RF 85mm f1.8, and on Taobao you can get the RF 35mm f2(The one same as E mount).