Is the Next VCM Prime Lens an RF 14mm f/2L VCM?

Craig Blair
3 Min Read

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here's how it works.

We reported a couple of weeks back that Canon would be releasing two more VCM lenses, and that at least one of them would not be f/1.4L like the current lineup of 5 lenses. This makes sense, especially if they go wider than 20mm or longer than 85mm.

Whining

To stay consistent with my decade long whining, I'd like an RF 28mm f/1.4L VCM. I'm not asking for a RF 10-1000mm f/1.4L IS VCM for under $2000.

Canon RF 14mm f/2L VCM

We were told today that one of those lenses would be an RF 14mm f/2L VCM. I do want to caution that this information didn't come from the previous source of VCM lens announcements, most recently the RF 85mm f/1.4L VCM.

I'm not a lens designer and Canon have come up with new lens design philosophy with these VCM lenses to keep them equal in size and weight. Along with the auto iris, aperture ring and a voice coil motor.

When we look at the Sumire series of cinema prime lenses, the Sumire CN-E 20mm is T1.5, and the Sumire CN-E 14mm is T3.1. While cinema lenses are obviously very different than the VCM set of prime lenses.

The CN-E 14mm T3.1 and CN-E 20mm T1.5 are very close in size and are identical weight, so there is some precedent here when it comes to Canon's philosophy when designing lenses designed for videographers.

There's some plausibility to this information, though I can't be as certain as I have been in the past when it comes to the VCM line of prime lenses.

Sadly, there is no Sumire CN-E 28mm T1.5.

When Can We Expect an Announcement?

We don't know for sure, but we don't expect another VCM lens announced in 2025, so 2026 is likely to fill out the VCM line of prime lenses.

Then maybe some photographer lenses such as an RF 35mm f/1.2L? Throw in a new RF 50mm f/1.2L an RF 85mm f/1.2L for good measure.

Go to discussion...

Share This Article
Craig is the founder and editorial director for Canon Rumors. He has been writing about all things Canon for more than 17 years. When he's not writing, you can find him shooting professional basketball and travelling the world looking for the next wildlife adventure. The Canon EOS R1 is his camera of choice.

48 comments

  1. A UWA lens makes sense, but I would think that Canon would do something at f1.4 to compete directly with the Sigma 14 mm f1.4. Why make it one stop slower? Maybe the two other VCM prime lenses will have a different filter size?
    • 0
  2. A UWA lens makes sense, but I would think that Canon would do something at f1.4 to compete directly with the Sigma 14 mm f1.4. Why make it one stop slower? Maybe the two other VCM prime lenses will have a different filter size?
    My thoughts exactly, at a minimum we should be looking at f/1.8 and ideally f/1.4.
    • 0
  3. A UWA lens makes sense, but I would think that Canon would do something at f1.4 to compete directly with the Sigma 14 mm f1.4. Why make it one stop slower? Maybe the two other VCM prime lenses will have a different filter size?
    This maybe something they come up with in the future, but will be big and heavy. The f2 is to keep the size in line with the VCM hybrid series, so I do understand it.
    • 0
  4. To keep the size of the tube and avoid the need for a convex front lens, the f2 is seems to be reasonable. Maybe f1.8 will fit too, but more like f2, so this can be absolutely realistic to keep price point on the same as the other VCM lens around 1800 USD 2000 EUR. As I mentioned before, at the other end of the series I expect a 105mm f/1.8 or f/2 instead of a longer 135mm version
    • 0
  5. A UWA lens makes sense, but I would think that Canon would do something at f1.4 to compete directly with the Sigma 14 mm f1.4. Why make it one stop slower? Maybe the two other VCM prime lenses will have a different filter size?
    The VCM line is supposed to be the "compact" L prime line, no? Suitable for gimbal use but also good for photos? I'm not sure if you have seen the Sigma 14/1.4 DG, but it's HUGE. It's awesome, to be sure, but it's HUGE.

    The real question IMO is how the proposed 14/2L will compare against Sony's 14/1.8GM. I'll get hate for this, but Canon's fast(ish) ultrawide primes have never been great. Nor have they ever been particularly fast. This will be new ground. Canon still charges US$2100+tax @ B&H for the EF 14/2.8L II, and it's just not that great a lens. Love or hate Sony, the 14/1.8GM is an absolute gem, and even after all the recent price increases it's $1750 @ B&H. (Ridiculously, it's $1110+tax here in Japan! The EF14/2.8L II is $1627+tax here.)

    More competition in the market will be great and I hope Canon comes through with a stunner of a lens and doesn't slap a $2500 price onto it.

    As for me, the new Viltrox AF 14/4 Air at $199 delivered is much more in line with what I want to spend on a lens I won't use all that often. Reviews have been very positive!
    • 0
  6. I'll get hate for this, but Canon's fast(ish) ultrawide primes have never been great. Nor have they ever been particularly fast.
    Which primes exactly? The widest L-series option is the RF 20mm f/1.4, and it’s solid. The RF 16mm f/2.8? That’s basically a semi-pancake designed to be cheap. Or are you talking about the EF 14mm f/2.8? Good luck designing a genuinely fast UWA for a 44mm flange distance.
    • 0
  7. I’d like an RF 28mm f/1.4L VCM....
    There is hope yet if the 14/f2 is indeed part of the current VCM series 🙂. Assuming that the other rumoured VCM is a f1.4, then that practically leaves 28/f1.4 (or thereabout) as the most viable option, as an f1.4 beyond 85mm would mean a 90mm lens at most, which does not seem to make sense.
    • 0
  8. as an f1.4 beyond 85mm would mean a 90mm lens at most, which does not seem to make sense.
    Even the 85mm f/1.4 isn’t really 85mm—more like 81mm. They had to make some compromises to keep the filter thread at 67mm. So I guess we won’t see anything longer than 85mm at f/1.4 in this lineup.
    • 0
  9. Similar to @mimbu it should be competitive with the Sony 14/1.8 in size/cost.current rf20/1.4 is about the same price as the Sony on B&h so maybe possible
    The 1 stop difference between F2 vs f2.8 for my samyang would be good (assuming reasonable coma) but doesn’t really fit the rumour of a ‘wild’ wide prime
    • 0
  10. All of the Canon f/1.4 VCM's look quite nice. Canon is my favorite brand. Ergonomics... beautiful lenses to match! But I have to admit, the 3rd party market is getting pretty hard to ignore. Some people are saying that the new Viltrox Pro 85 f/1.4 rivals the e-mount G Master lens. And it is only $600 (USD). If the Chinese keep this up, they are going to undercut the major camera brands on all of these f/1.4 lenses by $1,000. That's saving $1,000... per lens.
    • 0
  11. All of the Canon f/1.4 VCM's look quite nice. Canon is my favorite brand. Ergonomics... beautiful lenses to match! But I have to admit, the 3rd party market is getting pretty hard to ignore. Some people are saying that the new Viltrox Pro 85 f/1.4 rivals the e-mount G Master lens. And it is only $600 (USD). If the Chinese keep this up, they are going to undercut the major camera brands on all of these f/1.4 lenses by $1,000. That's saving $1,000... per lens.
    Everybody talks about the overweight Viltrox, but they ignore the Samyang 85mm f/1.4 — it’s been around forever and is far more practical. The Viltrox is nowhere near a GM II rival: 800g vs 642g.

    As a portrait shooter, you’re already hauling a strobe, a stand, a softbox, a second camera… so wasting weight on a Chinese anchor lens just isn’t acceptable.

    On the other hand, Chinese manufacturers are slashing prices like crazy, so I believe the rumor about an RF 45mm f/1.2 non-L might actually be true.
    Sigma managed to do it.
    You mean the 14mm DG HSM? At 1170 grams for a UWA prime, it’s not exactly practical for the general audience.
    • 0

Leave a comment

Please log in to your forum account to comment