It looks like Canon will be bringing one or more RF-S prime lenses for the Canon EOS R7 and Canon EOS R10. One of the most requested RF-S lenses is unsurprisingly a pancake lens. Keith at Northlight Images uncovered a patent at the USPTO with what looks to be RF-S pancake optical formulas.
None of these
Canon RF-S 14mm f/2.8
- Focal Length: 14.28mm
- F-Number: 2.90
- Half Angle of View: 51.88°
- Image Height: 18.20mm
- Total Lens Length: 57.50mm (image sensor to front element)
- Backfocus: 10.97mm
Canon RF-S 16mm f/2.8
- Focal Length: 16.48mm
- F-Number: 2.90
- Half Angle of View: 47.84°
- Image Height: 18.20mm
- Total Lens Length: 63.19mm (image sensor to front element)
- Backfocus: 12.54mm
Canon RF-S 10mm f/2.8
- Focal Length: 18.20mm
- F-Number: 2.90
- Half Angle of View: 45.00°
- Image Height: 18.20mm
- Total Lens Length: 63.45mm (image sensor to front element)
- Backfocus: 12.94mm
Canon RF-S 20mm f/2.8
- Focal Length: 20.10mm
- F-Number: 2.90
- Half Angle of View: 48.31°
- Image Height: 18.20mm
- Total Lens Length: 63.99mm (image sensor to front element)
- Backfocus: 11.16mm
Some of our articles may include affiliate links. If you purchase through these links, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you.
Are the lens going to be inserted into mount pipe?
Maybe a misprint, but perhaps Canon has deliberately elected to have a larger than normal image circle with these wide-angle optics, in order to minimise vignetting and softness in the corners?
Or am I being daft?
But a larger image circle for IBIS makes sense.
The "specs" are, as you say, an informed guess - by a highly experienced commentator, Keith Cooper of Northlight.
I'd be extremely surprised if his guess was wrong.
If the larger image circle was purely to accommodate IBIS, I would have expected Canon to design *all* of its RF-S lenses to have this image circle, not just the pancakes under examination here.
I think it's more likely that the larger image circle has been chosen to minimise corner softness and vignetting, both of which are a bigger problem with wide-angle pancakes than with longer focal lengths.
But like Keith, I'm only guessing ;)
A pancake takes up next to no room, and can even be carried in a pocket, to be available at all times.
When going to an event where my primary lens was the 70-200/2.8, it was great to be able to drop the EF 40/2.8 into my pocket and swap on a normal focal length lens as needed (I typically carry with a BR strap attached to the lens foot, so the 70-200 could simply dangle from that as I shot with the 40 mm pancake) – it was a great, portable solution.
That’s not really an option with my R3, because having to carry both the adapter and the pancake lens defeats the purpose. I would definitely like a normal or wide (not ultrawide) pancake prime for RF full frame.
Slap that massive 50mm 1.2 on it if you want.