The SIGMA 200-500mm f/2.8 EX DG was a very niche lens that SIGMA released in 2007. I had a chance to hold one back when Lensrentals.com had a copy of the behemoth. It's big and heavy, but who was it made for?
I have been told that law enforcement and military were the main customers for the SIGMA 200-500mm f/2.8, but we don't know how many were actually sold. Lensrentals.com did say it only rented a couple of times when they did have it in their inventory.
Juza of JuzaPhoto posted the original review of the lens back in 2009. He has now had another chance to use the SIGMA 200-500mm f/2.8 in the field and has written about it.
The backstory for the review
There is only one example of the 200-500 2.8 in all of Italy: it is the one I tested in 2009, which was then sold to a private individual and finally purchased by RCE Foto, a chain of shops with which I have been collaborating for some time. As soon as I found out, I contacted them to present them with the project of this field test, and even if with a bit of effort I managed to convince Luca from RCE Livorno (whom I thank from the bottom of my heart, and who obviously I recommend that you are from the area and want to sell or buy used) to lend me the lens for this adventure.
You can check out the full review and sample gallery over at JuzaPhoto
The review is in Italian, but Google Translateworks just fine.
Sooooo, one day trekking and sleeping in a tent with a 18kg lens, just to take the picture of a flower...lol.
Then a mono-expression and half asleep model, some random ducks, then the last day in the nature, not a single picture taken (not even that single flower!), apart from two backstage pictures of himself flexing the biceps; could expect nothing less from the guy ahah, seems like a photo shoot to create pics for his Tinder/Grindr profile ahahah :LOL:
The cityscapes are the only decent pictures, they're pretty good, but he could have easily taken them with something less exotic and less of a burden.
Nice lens, but he's still a clown, even more so then before; but kudos to him for putting the thing with the tripod in the water (even if he probably have enough money to pay the bill if the Sigmonster sunk in the water), you need balls for that.
The 1st version of EF 600mm 4.0 took 6.0kg onto the tripod. No, paired with an extender I did not handhold this ....
I am happy with my RF 800 f/11 IS anyway.
I can hear at the complaints already… At f/14, it is unusably slow. It needs an adapter to work with my R-series body. It doesn’t take extenders. Yada yada yada.
edit: how heavy would a 600 2.8 be?