Gordon from CameraLabs has done a great review of the Voigtlander 50mm F1.0 Nokton RF. Yes, that's an F-One-Point-Zero.

Of course, the only reason it's allowed on our precious RF mount legally is that it's manual focus, so, at F1.0, that's going to provide some challenges. But if you grew up with manual focus lenses or want to jump into that world for the first time, perhaps this smaller lens is right for you.

How much smaller? Quite a bit actually. The Voigtlander is a little smaller than the Canon EF 50mm F1.2L, so shown below is a comparison just to show how different the sizes are. The size difference is fairly substantial, as would be the balance on the camera. Thanks to camerasize.com for this comparison.

image 12 728x455 - Voigtlander RF 50mm f/1 Nokton Review

Now, granted the Canon RF 50mm F1.2L has the fantastic resolution chops to warrant the larger size, and it's more optically corrected as well. The Canon RF 50mm F1.2L also has autofocus and auto aperture, something the Voigtlander is missing in a completely manual lens. The Voigtlander does have electrical contacts and does actually talk to the RF cameras, allowing for the recording of aperture selection and also for focus assist tools to work on the camera. The Voigtlander is also cheaper than the Canon RF 50mm F1.2L coming in at $1799 versus the Canon RF 50mm F1.2L's $2299.

I love these sorts of lenses for what they force us to do – slow down to a more methodical approach, but it's certainly not for everyone. I also used Voigtlander lenses on a film rangefinder and enjoyed the experience, so I'm perhaps a little biased. At F1.0, your depth of field is very narrow making it a challenge to use efficiently or even accurately. You will have to take many more pictures just to make sure you grab on in focus, versus one that misses. But our digital film is free now, so that's less of a concern.

Gordon has done a great review, and you can tell he really enjoyed using the lens and the challenges imposed by the manual focus. If you are not a youtube watcher you can read his review here.

Gordon concludes;

The Voigtlander 50mm f1 Nokton proved to be one of the most satisfying and enjoyable lenses I’ve used in a long time. It may not match the ultimate sharpness or correction of the best mirrorless lenses available, especially wide-open, but more than makes up for it with character. Photos from the lens simply look fabulous with beautiful colours, contrast and rendering, plus if you are willing to stop-down a little, you can enjoy very crisp results across the frame from f2 onwards.

In an attempt to make things foolproof, the modern photographic experience can often feel detached and clinical. In contrast, the mechanical focusing of the 50mm f1 Nokton felt more engaging than any gear I’ve tested in a long time, invariably putting a smile on my face. It’s just the right balance of being sufficiently hands-on to feel like you’re in control, with enough hand-holding to make it truly easy.

You can grab this lens at B&H for 1799.00.

Some of our articles may include affiliate links. If you purchase through these links, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you.

Go to discussion...

Share.

12 comments

  1. Unless I've lost the plot, the illustration shows an EOS R5 with an RF50mm f/1.2 compared to the same camera with an EF 50mm f/1.2 lens WITHOUT AN ADAPTOR - which is wrong two ways... It's impossible, and it's not a Nokton f/1.0. Try again...
  2. Unless I've lost the plot, the illustration shows an EOS R5 with an RF50mm f/1.2 compared to the same camera with an EF 50mm f/1.2 lens WITHOUT AN ADAPTOR - which is wrong two ways... It's impossible, and it's not a Nokton f/1.0. Try again...
    The article is wording that bit very awkwardly, but the way I read it is: "Camerasizes.com has no picture for the Nokton yet, but it's smaller than the EF50 f/1.2L, here's a picture of the EF50L on the R5, without an adapter because the Nokton is a native RF mount lens."
  3. I wouldn't hesitate one second: RF 1,2/50.
    Optically better, AF, "moderate" price difference. Even though the Voigtländer is tempting...
    Voigtländer have proven once again that they are able to develop and produce great lenses! If only their WA Leica M mount lenses were 6 bit coded...
    Presently, with the exception of the 15mm III, they are unusable on Leica digitals.
  4. Looking at perfect RF 50/1.2, I cannot justify the price of that Voighländer. IMHO I define such kind of lenses as “effect lenses“ of “mood lenses to walk and play with“. I have the Zeiss 1,4/50 ZE lens for that as an example. It didn‘t cost me much. This prime costs too much for such kind of the equipment and isn‘t good for serious usage today. Maybe in a few years as used item from those who‘s disappointed in it and ready to get rid of for less.

    To admins: please do something with your editor to avoid \"escaping\" special characters. Not many people are able to type specialized quotes from their keyboards.
  5. Voigtländer have proven once again that they are able to develop and produce great lenses!
    I‘d say it‘s a bit too loud statement. Voigtländer is able to make not bad lenses in its category but they are just a fraction better than that gazillion of “Chyunese artisans“, no more. Their marketologists should keep that fact in mind each time they draw a price tag for a new model. The APO-Lanthar series is the only exclusion.
  6. I‘d say it‘s a bit too loud statement. Voigtländer is able to make not bad lenses in its category but they are just a fraction better than that gazillion of “Chyunese artisans“, no more. Their marketologists should keep that fact in mind each time they draw a price tag for a new model. The APO-Lanthar series is the only exclusion.
    You are right about the Apo Lanthars, these were the lenses I actually referred to. The other ones are still well made, though never exceptional...
    By the way, Cosina, Voigtländer's parent company, also produces some of the sharpest lenses ever. For instance the Zeiss ZM 2,8/25 I own, (I read somewhere of 400 lines per mm.) and 90% of the other Zeiss lenses...
  7. The other ones are still well made
    They are really well made. They even can look beautifully being mounted on some cameras. However, "well made" does not automatically mean they shoot well.

    Yeah, Cosina is also has a relation to the modern Zeiss and even it manufactured Zeiss-branded lenses. Though there's a Voigtländer and there's Zeiss.
  8. They are really well made. They even can look beautifully being mounted on some cameras. However, "well made" does not automatically mean they shoot well.

    Yeah, Cosina is also has a relation to the modern Zeiss and even it manufactured Zeiss-branded lenses. Though there's a Voigtländer and there's Zeiss.
    And the difference (2,8/35 vs. 2,8/35 Zeiss ZM) can be huge...
  9. They are really well made. They even can look beautifully being mounted on some cameras. However, "well made" does not automatically mean they shoot well.

    Yeah, Cosina is also has a relation to the modern Zeiss and even it manufactured Zeiss-branded lenses. Though there's a Voigtländer and there's Zeiss.
    Those Zeiss lenses are huge - and they deliver.
    Voigtländers are tiny - sometimes smaller than the Leica Ms - and they are not too bad in delivering.
    Some Leicas are great, all are by far too expensive.
  10. Voigtländers are tiny - sometimes smaller than the Leica Ms...
    Voigtländers are tiny, somethimes dull and they barely deliver. Are Zeiss 2/50 ZM and 2/35 ZM somehow huge? I even didn't notice much "hugeness" in Zeiss 1,4/50 ZE.

Leave a comment

Please log in to your forum account to comment