I agree with you, I have 2 R5's at this point and I shoot mainly wildlife, I am banging out keepers on a continuous that I wouldn't never been able to before, I don't see the need to upgrade at all to a version II at this point. I'm just super happy with the R5
Maybe there is a certain mindset that is more about envy, about the grass is greener, so I'm going to brand X.
Starting from scratch, rational consumers should go with the best they can afford. But those who claim they have been "loyal to Canon for years," must know that Canon continues to make some of the best and most reliable gear on Earth, so I simply don't believe that somebody who has had success with a brand, and who has enjoyed shooting with it for a long period of time, would come here with a threatening tantrum. I honestly can't imagine what other impulses we might be seeing.
If I hadn't bought some RF gear a few years back, if I only had a Canon dSLR, even a 1-series, and a set of good EF glass, especially L, and I saw how well reviewed and solid the R5 has been, I'd either just buy an R5 or wait another month to see what the R5II might add. I wouldn't just dump my L glass and go play with a whole new set of gear--unless I had somebody else's money to burn (I'm thinking trust-fund here), and wanted to brag about having the latest and greatest.
(Guess I didn't get my irritation with tantrums out of my system. That's what I get for being off wheat, added sugar, and alcohol for a month!)