Canon to update the RF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM and RF 600mm f/4L IS USM?

Craig Blair
6 Min Read

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

Canon’s supertelephoto lenses are the stuff of legend. They have always been insanely reliable, built like tanks and optical quality that has always been superb. Somehow, with each iteration of their lenses, they get better.

The Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM III and Canon EF 600mm f/4L IS USM III were the last lenses launched for the EF mount back in 2018.

Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM III

Canon RF Mount Versions

Canon launched the Canon RF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM and Canon RF 600mm f/4L IS USM in 2021, but they’re optically identical to their EF counterparts. Canon waited for cameras like the Canon EOS R5 and Canon EOS R3 to be launched before they brought them to the RF mount.

They did do a fancy silver mount for the RF versions of the lenses. Maybe one day we’ll get Rose Gold mounts.

Canon claimed at the time of launch of both lenses, that the Canon EOS R3 would improve autofocus speed with extra power sent to the lens through the RF mount from the camera.

I have never really noticed much of an autofocus speed difference between shooting the Canon RF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM on a Canon EOS R1, Canon EOS R3 or Canon EOS R6. Your milage may very of course.

Supertelephoto Prime Lenses With Built-in Teleconverters

Today, RIchard found a patent showing optical formulas for new RF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM and RF 600mm f/4L IS USM with built-in 1.4 teleconverters. Both of these lenses would be welcomed by professionals the world over.

Canon RF 600mm f/4L IS USM

A few months ago I was told that Canon would be updating both lenses by the time 2026 rolled around, but I didn’t put much stock in it and waited for something a bit more reliable.

Now sometimes you get very short confirmations of information from sources, and all we received about the published patent was a smiley face. I may take that differently than our readers, but that’s usually a good sign. It’s not the first time, and it won’t be the last.

Isn’t it too Soon?

Canon has updated both the 400mm f/2.8 and 600mm f/4 lenses in pretty short order in the past. The version II to version III for the EF mount was only a 7-year product cycle. We think it’s obvious that the last EF version was designed with the RF mount in mind, but they’re not truly “RF” lenses. Both are remarkable though!

A 5-year turnaround for new versions and adding teleconverters isn’t too far-fetched.

We don’t know what the big white lenses mean to Canon’s bottom line, but I think they sell more of them than we think. These lenses also probably keep and bring certain photographers and videographers into the Canon lineup.

A new line of cameras may also bring some benefit to the performance of both lenses, like we saw with the EOS R3. Maybe there’s something hidden in the EOS R1?

If Canon could shave weight off either of the lenses, that’d be a worthwhile upgrade for a lot of shooters. The RF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM weighs in at 2840g (6.2lbs) and the RF 600mm f/4L IS USM weighs at 3050g (6.7lbs). Both were considerably lighter than their predecessors shaving around 1kg (2.2lbs) from each lens.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 400mm f/2.8 TC VR S

Summary

We do notice that we’re not seeing any Canon RF 500mm f/4L IS USM optical formula designs, but we are seeing a fair number of 400mm and 600mm optical designs. We know the EF 500mm f/4L IS USM II replacement is going to be a zoom like the brilliant Canon RF 100-300mm f/2.8L IS USM. I do think built-in teleconverters are the way forward for Canon and the “Big White” lenses.

400mm and 600mm primes with 1.4x TC’s built-in like Nikon is doing? Sign me up.

We think there is some truth to this, though a timeframe for such an announcement is obviously unknown currently, but perhaps we’ll see them in late in 2025 or in early 2026.

The Winter Olympics take place in 2026, and Canon always seems to do something ahead of big sporting events. The games start on February 6, 2026, and are being held in Milan and Cortina d’Ampezzo, Italy.

Go to discussion...

Share This Article
Craig is the founder and editorial director for Canon Rumors. He has been writing about all things Canon for more than 17 years. When he's not writing, you can find him shooting professional basketball and travelling the world looking for the next wildlife adventure. The Canon EOS R1 is his camera of choice.

60 comments

  1. 400 f/2.8 with built in TC
    600 f/4 with built in TC
    200-500 f/4, maybe with a built in TC

    All of these are very interesting. I suspect one of them will end up in my bag. But, Canon, I can't give you money for something you have not yet released.
  2. I'm seriously considering the RF 600mm f/4L for sports photography, but rumors like this have me thinking I should wait. Since the RF 600 is basically the EF with an RF mount slapped on it, I'm wondering if/when Canon will announce the full RF successor. Given the cost, this isn't a lens I'd want to knee jerk purchase, especially with the possibility of a replacement on the horizon......

    Decisions.
  3. Make the 300mm a 1500 gram lens like Sony just made and they have an absolute winner on their hands! The new 100-300mm is too expensive and too heavy to be used handheld, but already duplicates a lot of the focal range that's already covered by my 70-200. In fact if you add the weight of the 70-200 and a hypothetical (Sony-esq) 1500 gram 300mm together, it's still lighter than the current 100-300mm, plus you always have to option to not bring your 70-200 for a super light handheld run and gun loadout. 300mm is the perfect for track-side motorsports photography, which is primarily what I shoot, but the current EF 300 II is still 2700 grams and gets tiring real fast without mono-pod.
  4. I think a 400L and 600L with a built-in TC and the same weight/build quality/IQ would be the target. Nikon has shown it can be done. Better if they can keep it at the same price, but matching the Nikons in price (i.e. a $1k increase) would not be unreasonable.
  5. I think a 400L and 600L with a built-in TC and the same weight/build quality/IQ would be the target. Nikon has shown it can be done. Better if they can keep it at the same price, but matching the Nikons in price (i.e. a $1k increase) would not be unreasonable.
    I hope you are right about size, weight, image quality and price. I suspect that Canon’s prices will be higher than Nikon’s prices. In the Netherlands the Nikon 600 mm f4 with 1.4 TC has roughly the same price as the RF 600mm f4 (15000 €, incl. VAT).
  6. Maybe I should buy finally soon a second hand 500 4.0 II -.-"... damn Canon. Upselling like this is annoying! (We don't want that you can buy nice primes < 10k€... just buy a zoom for >12-13k€ 😒👎
  7. For me it would be bad news, it may mean we'll never see the 1x to 2x "zoom" teleconverter
    We were never going to see that anyway, when you actually read the patent on which that rumor was based you see that it's not what the rumor claims. The big initial clue is that it has 4 elements in 2 groups. The RF 1.4x has 7 elements in 4 groups, the 2x has 9 elements in 5 groups but somehow a 1x-2x extender has almost no glass in it? Especially when you consider that physics requires a '1.0x' extender to actually be a reducer (otherwise infinity focus is lost as happens with an extension tube). So no, it wasn't going to happen.

    There was another patent for a 1.4x-2x extender that was actually for an extender, basically a 1.4x with optics for a second 1.4x the flip out of the way (in two groups). That one could be a real product.
  8. I can speak from experience, I own the RF 600 F4 for almost 2 years now, use it for wildlife and I am over the moon happy with it. I can tell you when I shot with the R5 the focus was not as fast as it was on an R3. It did not utilize both focus motors in the lens. It was quite noticeable.

    I have since upgraded to the R5m2 and the af moves as fast as the full bodies (R1, R3). So a great upgrade from the original R5, for wildlife the biggest improvement is tracking with the R5m2 over the original. BIF are a breeze now. The original was definitely not using the full potential of the RF600.

    I have many perched birds in very low, late light, at 1/60 of a second with the IS + IBIS on a monopod and surprised at the hit rate I get for sharpness. This lens always amazes me.
  9. A second generation 400 mm f2.8 with 1.4x TC would be great. I am also eyeing the mythical 200-500 mm f4 as well. Usually, Canon announces supertelephoto lenses in the March to May timeframe so maybe 2025 will be a year for supertelephotos?
  10. A second generation 400 mm f2.8 with 1.4x TC would be great. I am also eyeing the mythical 200-500 mm f4 as well. Usually, Canon announces supertelephoto lenses in the March to May timeframe so maybe 2025 will be a year for supertelephotos?
    There are no Olympics this year, so 2025 will not be a supertele year.
  11. with an inbuilt 1.4xTC, what external TCs can be added? Does the patent allow space for external TCs?
    Yes, the back focus distance is plenty long enough for TCs in back of any of the patent examples.
  12. There are no Olympics this year, so 2025 will not be a supertele year.
    There were no Olympics in 2023, yet Canon released the RF 100-300 mm f2.8 on April 20, 2023. My point is you never know.

Leave a comment

Please log in to your forum account to comment