• m4ndr4ke
    Wide open, the Sigma EF 50 Art isn't that sharp, honestly. It's excellent by 10 year old standards (it was released in 2014), but...
  • ImageStream
    Interesting. I chose the R6 MKII over the R5, precisely because of the higher ISO range. Sad if Canon prioritizes MP over high ISO...
  • candyman
    ISO range voor R5 Mark II
    • ISO Range R5M2.jpg
  • Stig Nygaard
    I think it is to be expected with the MP increase. For comparision, the 45MP EOS R5 Mark II has a maximum native ISO of 51.200.
  • EricN
    RP has the same 2.36 and it's defenitly easy for to make mistakes with manual focus and exposure that I wouldn't have with R5. It is...
  • Tom R5R7
    Yeah, that 17-55 was nice. I used the 17-40L on my 10D and kept it through, I think, my 40D. It was a pretty sharp lens on a crop body...
  • S
    Tbh I hardly notice the difference between the EVFs on my r6ii and r5ii. I’ve never tried an r8 to compare
  • D
    I've once tested a friend's R8's EVF, and didn't like it at all. Honestly, I also hated the EOS R for its 3,7 m. dots. The same for the...
  • ISv
    ISv replied to the thread Show your Bird Portraits.
    It's what I'm actually doing: I don't own a gun:)!I have 3 cameras and a cell-phone, only the last one is good for fast shooting to my...
  • ISv
    ISv replied to the thread Dragonflies and Damselflies.
    I had to watch it with my daughter: at that time it was kind of a ritual. Nice memories not only because the interaction with my...
  • Philnick
    I agree that Canon has always sidelined its APS-C models, trying to force ambitious users to go full frame - or at least buy full-frame...
  • Tom R5R7
    I would take interest in that Sigma 17-40 myself if I didn't have an R5 also - it sounds like a great lens for low light situations like...
  • Philnick
    Have her get the Sigma RF-S 17-40mm f/1.8 DC Art. It's a standard zoom (equivalent focal lengths 29-64mm) more than a stop faster than...
  • Exploreshootshare
    I liked the R´s EVF. Only the blackout in high-speed shooting is/ was a problem. The R5 on paper has a better EVF, but I never really...
  • T
    I'm still used to the optical viewfinder on APSC DSLRs where I couldn't see almost anything so the R was a huge upgrade to me :D Yes the...
  • P-visie
    P-visie replied to the thread Show your Bird Portraits.
    Next time when you want to shoot: use your camera;).
  • ISv
    ISv replied to the thread Show your Bird Portraits.
    No reason: the Great Blue is not a natural inhabitant of Japan and as I know it's not recorded even as a vagrant. I survived so far :)!
  • Exploreshootshare
    I don´t like the overly sharp Sigmas... sometimes it doesn't look like separation in the image, but like someone photoshopped a person...
  • T
    That's exactly what I did. After buying the R6 in 2020, I replaced a Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art that I used with my 5DIII with a used Canon EF...
  • Exploreshootshare
    I´m sure these people exist, I just haven't met them in photography (yet). Usually, I see a lot of people act like that when they talk...
  • m4ndr4ke
    I can’t speak for B&H, they’re irrelevant on this side of the Atlantic, but the EF 50mm f/1.2 doesn’t attach to a Canon mirrorless...
  • ImageStream
    You state that the expected Max ISO of the R6 Mark III is 64,000. Yet, isn't that a downgrade? The Max native ISO of the Mark II is 102,400.
  • P-visie
    Canon in the Netherlands has the EF 50mm f1.2 lens in it’s webstore and in stock, as have other large photoshops (for 1699€, incl. VAT...
  • J
    If I am reading things correctly, B&H lists the EF version of that as discontinued, and they don't list an RF version.
  • Walrus
    People like to brag L lenses, even when the lens sucks...it's just "I have a thicker wallet then yours"; you can afford it, and you want...
  • Filter

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    37,272
    Messages
    966,960
    Members
    24,634
    Latest member
    Mcsnows

    Gallery statistics

    Categories
    1
    Albums
    29
    Uploaded media
    353
    Embedded media
    1
    Comments
    25
    Disk usage
    982.4 MB