mangobutter said:

My guess, RF 28-50 1.8 or 24-35 1.8, the latter one probably being a bit harder to make. I do not think there will be a 1.4 zoom.

Click to expand...

f/1.8 is not really different enough from f/2 unless they add IS or something

Well, according to a recent article, Yodobashi sees Hasselblad XCD 2,8–4/35–100E as the #1 selling lens these days

Berowne said:

So, if Canon will make a fast zoom, we should expect a plastic phantastic with low image quality like the 1.2/45 or APS-C glass. But definitely not a L Lens.

Click to expand...

What do you class as low quality?

The 1.2/45 is not trying to be the sharpest lens in the world, just a reasonable priced offering for the masses.

Ph0t0 said:

I hope they really release something like this.
For my use ... something in the area of 35-85mm f1.4 would be a dream lens. Even if it is a 50-85mm f1.4 I would still buy it.

Click to expand...

I'm OK with 50-85/1.8

scyrene said:

Is IS necessary when IBIS works so well with it?

Click to expand...

Surprisingly yes.
I just had a recent experience with the 28-70/2, shooting in low light conditions (event). I was shocked to see how I can see the lack of IS on the images and probably how much I got used using IS. I had to explicitly focus on having a steady hand which I haven't much done in the past ~15y.

Btw, I don't really see Canon leaving IS behind despite the development of IBIS. I believe it's the combination of the two which can give a real good result. Especially at higher focal lengths, but I'm no expert, can't draw a graph
2025 - 14-30 IS, 16-28 IS
2024 - 28-70 IS

Looks like not only cats just sit where they want.

Guess who's my Princess. Well.. queen actually.
Picture quality isn't the best unfortunately, 12800 ISO and no time to really prepare for the shots.

I am getting tired of this one trick pony. Too many wide angle primes and zooms and not much in mid-tele, that is badly required. No real fast lenses for crop cameras, but rummer to have another R7 without any good lenses. What’s the point? I am purchasing Sima fast lenses for my R7.

Berowne said:

An RF 24-50/1.8L may easily cost 4000€. Who will spend so much money?

Click to expand...

That wouldn’t stop many buyers. The 28-70mm f/2 cost about 3600 to 3900€ at launch

And the Sony 50-150mm f/2 is selling for more than that, so there is a market.

If f/1.4, I’d put about 1k on top of that price.

Still waiting for mine. Looks like Australia is behind the US and UK. Called the store and they have no idea when it'll be in.

It would be too expensive. Only a lens in the range of 24-50mm may perhaps be made a little bit faster than f 2.0 with good IQ and acceptable price - think of an f1.8. An RF 24-50/1.8L may easily cost 4000€. Who will spend so much money?

So, if Canon will make a fast zoom, we should expect a plastic phantastic with low image quality like the 1.2/45 or APS-C glass. But definitely not a L Lens.

SirIssacNewton said:

Wax wing looks amazing, wish we had them in North Carolina! Last one is spectacular! Well done

Click to expand...

@SirIssacNewton thank you, kindly!

DhlcadR6 said:

I can't wait for RF 10-1200mm f0.95L IS VCM Macro x1.4 Extender.....

Click to expand...

Give it another 20-30 years. We are heading in that direction.

I can't wait for RF 10-1200mm f0.95L IS VCM Macro x1.4 Extender.....

Jokes aside, something like 50-150 or 35-70 f2/1.8/1.4L IS VCM/USM and under $3000USD will be pretty decent.

So for example if you look the lowest path of those 3 lines starting from down drawn on the patent, it bounces once and then goes through the second time.

But if you had another photon coming on the red arrow I drew (poorly) so it enters the same trajectory as the bounced photon, would they both pass the same spot on the back of the lens or would the red arrow photon make bounce while the other one goes through.

Photons don't have memory so if they hit the same spot, they should both behave the same. But then the red arrow path wouldn't make the bounce. So there's something strange here, maybe they left out something critical.

Exploreshootshare said:

Looking at Richards table with all the different zoom ranges from the patent, I´d personally say 28-55mm F1.4 sounds the most intriguing. I´d also love 35-70mm and I´d consider buying one of these lenses if the prices allows it. An UWA f1.4 zoom such as 16-24mm F1.4 wouldn't interest me at all. But that's just me

Click to expand...

Keep in mind, and my article mentioned this, that most of those lens designs would be almost impossible even for a fixed lens camera with a back focus distance of .4mm, which basically has the rear element touching the sensor. basically 2 hair thicknesses away from the sensor, and I'm not sure if that includes the IR filter stack or the physical sensor itself. which could mean it's touching the sensor.

There is one design, and one design only (which was highlighted at a 15mm back focus distance).

Also, all those designs are huge - think 8" lens designs as well for a very narrow focal zoom range. While a lot of the .4mm back focus designs were collapsable I think, they are still far larger than what we would expect from a compact camera, and an ultra wide zoom lens even if it's f/1.4

danfaz said:

Hi guys, a few portraits (and one tiny BIF) from the last weekend.
We have a Cedar Waxwing, Say's Phoebe, Bewick's Wren and a Red-winged Blackbird.

View attachment 228252View attachment 228253View attachment 228254View attachment 228255

Click to expand...

Wax wing looks amazing, wish we had them in North Carolina! Last one is spectacular! Well done

Got mine on Monday. Took very few test shots on Tuesday. Here is a single 15-second long exposure.

Del Paso said:

24-45: For me, a very interesting focal range, to complement a 70-200 and a 14mm TS-E.
Even if it were no f/1,4, but an f/2,8.

Click to expand...

I really enjoyed using the Sigma 24-35 f/2 for a few years. Like 3 primes.

Del Paso said:

70-135 f/1,4 would be very nice and useful for many.
I do not expect this zoom to cover an extreme range, f/1,4 will be already difficult to design.
But Canon have already used us to spectacular lens developments in the past, so, who knows?

Click to expand...

70-135 f/1.4... stop trying to seduce me.

NjalF said:

7D Mark II in May/June this year?

Click to expand...

Good news, it already came out in Sept 2014.
just teasing you

I hope they really release something like this.
For my use ... something in the area of 35-85mm f1.4 would be a dream lens. Even if it is a 50-85mm f1.4 I would still buy it.

scyrene said:

Is IS necessary when IBIS works so well with it?

Click to expand...

Agree. I don't think so, at least not for high end lenses with short focal lengths.
I understand the need when pairing budget lenses with cameras like the RP/R8, but he who buys a 28-70mm f/2 should at least afford a R6.

I'll take the development of groundbreaking new lenses over the addition of IS any day.

Heck, I'd even take lenses without IS up to 200, maybe 300mm, if it meant other benefits like wider apertures or crazy zoom ranges.
I'm happy as long as I can get one to two stops of IBIS. I remember my old EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L non-IS allowed me 1/50 at 200mm on my R6 and I always found it to be more than adequate.

The video is really great and the photos are even more awesome.