• S
    Like Del Paso mentionned, I haven't had a single issue since upgrading. I would recommend using the app to do it : somehow I couldn't...
  • D
    I have updated my 2 R5 II cameras. No issues at all , after 3 weeks and thousands of pictures. Everything worked perfectly for me. Yet...
  • Eloniel
    Just received my R5 MK2, it has the v1.03 firmware should I update it to v1.11 or there is a major drawback that should prevent me from...
  • D
    Again lots of conjectures, statements without proofs and many "I believes".
  • Philnick
    Not making anything up. You said you want a big full-frame camera with the R7's sensor. Still not getting any response to my proposals...
  • P-visie
    You have posted that theory before and I have explained that these fundamental design decisions are not taken in the last few months of...
  • S
    Apart from the 100-500 and the extending 70-200, it's basically no different to how extenders worked for EF, is it? Apologies if I'm...
  • P-visie
    I’m not one of those “believers”. Yes I would like to have optically corrected lenses, but those have a cost, in price, size and weight...
  • Walrus
    I have no proof to that, but I'm ready to bet that there are more prosumers then pros with an R5 in the bag, and more pros then...
  • S
    I'm really curious to understand how this new release would be anything like a 6D; not even the R8 is as limited as that was...
  • Philnick
    You full-framers feel entitled to change the APS-C model to make it into just one more copy of your cameras. How about our muscle...
  • D
    The extender approach for the RF lenses has been a bummer for me. I'm also still a fan of always-on manual focus with the AF in...
  • Click
    Click replied to the thread Show your Bird Portraits.
    I really like the first one. Great shot! Well done, Alan.
  • B
    The 100-500 is F6.3 at 400mm. But i agree most people on internet comparing it to other 100-400 lenses that stop at 400mm. Same...
  • AlanF
    AlanF replied to the thread Show your Bird Portraits.
    Blackheaded Gull (R5ii/200-800mm).
    • 6L8A9104-DxO_Blackheaded_Gull_Diving-ls-ts.jpeg
    • 6L8A9091-DxO_Blackheaded_Gull_Eating_Fish 2x.jpg
  • Ozarker
    When considering the end result, why? As far as I can tell nearly all lenses need some type of corrections or Photoshop wouldn't have...
  • Walrus
    Just a little :eek: and with the adapter is even more front heavy; that's why I'm looking forward to this new 45 f1.2 if it is any good
  • S
    Some headline apertures ratios are narrower* on RF lenses than what came before, but again this issue has been blown out of proportion...
  • S
    My 40 Art's AF seems accurate enough, but it's definitely slower and noisier than most Canon USM lenses I've used. Ridiculously sharp...
  • BFG9000
    The AF of the latest Art/Sports Sigma lenses (15mm f/1.4 fisheye, 35mm f/1.2 II, 135mm f/1.4, 200mm f/2, for example) is instantaneous...
  • Walrus
    I can guarantee my 40 Art, 105 Art and 24-105 Art are as good as any Canon RF (yes, RF, non EF) when comparing consistency and accuracy...
    • 04-LAC.jpg
  • Click
    Click replied to the thread Show your Bird Portraits.
    Lovely series, ISv.
  • m4ndr4ke
    That ended when Canon launched the RF mount, back in 2018 lol. We all know Canon's EF lenses work a lot better on mirrorless cameras...
  • P
    I hope that the new 45mm 1.2 is going to be a sharp lens with slow AF and cheap housing. And that the replacement for 50mm 1.2 is a f1.0...
  • Filter

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    37,272
    Messages
    966,928
    Members
    24,634
    Latest member
    Mcsnows

    Gallery statistics

    Categories
    1
    Albums
    29
    Uploaded media
    353
    Embedded media
    1
    Comments
    25
    Disk usage
    982.4 MB