• D
    Responding to thoughts in no specific order to Riker, DSB and David from Sydney......... Small files I add to posts aren't a fair...
    • IMG_1953.jpeg
    • IMG_1956.jpeg
  • vjlex
    I have the 24-70, so 24-35 range is already covered. Which leaves the 15-23 uncovered. I do like the versatility of a zoom, but the...
  • Ian K
    Bryan’s review is already out: https://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-RF-14mm-F1-4-L-VCM-Lens.aspx
  • S
    I was wrong there, wasn't I? The RF fisheye is pretty much the same size as the EF, even allowing for the length of the adapter. It's a...
  • Richard-CN
    Canon reads our best and worst of 2025, especially the bit on the ELPH 360 HS A, and goes "hold my beer."
  • O
    OldDudePhotog replied to the thread R1 CFexpress Type B cards.
    I run two of these in either 512gb or 1tb, granted when I bought mine they were WAY cheaper than this...
  • H
    So you know what is too heavy and expensive for me? Have you shot the 100-300mm 2.8? Poor attempt at breaking it down “to the point” …
    • 1770290210116.png
  • exkeks
    Even though the 7-14 is sadly a bit larger than its EF predecessor, it's kinda sexy that Canon managed to keep this lens in the VCM...
  • Richard-CN
    I don't think I'm wrong.
    • 1770289748504.png
  • AlanF
    The MTFs you posted for the discontinued EF 8-15 are old versions, calculated differently, and not allowing for diffraction. Here are...
    • Screenshot 2026-02-05 at 10.54.59.png
  • Richard-CN
    Astro imaging though, is one photographic realm where you do have to do alot of post processing. The corrections for removing...
  • Etnaphele
    I see around half a stop in the worse regions of the frame, never reaching a stop. But the point stands, this is a hard trade off due to...
  • D
    Amazing how light this lens is, compared to Sigma's anvil. Also very sharp and extremely compact. I wonder when mine will be delivered! :)
  • D
    The uses are different. For a short trip, I usually take the 15-35 + 70-200, and get a very good coverage. But with a larger backpack...
  • Toamelicious
    Yes please 😌 This is actually what I'm hoping for with this release, as I do not really care for both lenses, but I really want some...
  • Malm
    Your 'slightly worse' is more than one stop! I was expecting this due to the limited diameter of the VCM lenses. In general I'm not a...
  • GirlsAreBeautiful
    I've found a refurbished like new 512 for 140 a few days ago. It was very lucky.
  • Etnaphele
    I was probably wrong regarding vignetting, it's slightly worse than the Sigma...
  • benperrin
    Mmm. Not bad. It's loaded with light pollution but as long as the edges are decent then it's enough to judge with. Astigmatism is...
  • eero
    I have no need for these lenses yet, but one thing I have to say: I wish the RF100-300mm had a similar internal filter slot.
  • eero
  • m4ndr4ke
    This lens is not relevant to me, but I have to say it’s definitely very impressive That’s a lot of engineering going in there
  • Etnaphele
    The Digital Picture in 3...2...1...
  • Etnaphele
    Vignetting seem much less than the Sigma 14mm 1.4, somehow... A bit more barrel distortion, but this lens really looks like a...
  • Tmjc.wolf
    Gordon from camera labs has already shown some uncorrected images in his first-looks video. The corrections don't look as heavy as I...
    • 1000048379.jpg
    • 1000048380.jpg
  • Filter

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    37,419
    Messages
    972,742
    Members
    24,774
    Latest member
    KingLOSO

    Gallery statistics

    Categories
    1
    Albums
    29
    Uploaded media
    372
    Embedded media
    1
    Comments
    25
    Disk usage
    1 GB