• @zajicekpavel
    https://adobe.ly/4nYIJXx https://adobe.ly/4u5nPYj
  • @zajicekpavel
    @zajicekpavel replied to the thread Reptiles and Amphibians.
    tree frog https://adobe.ly/4dEVH9C
  • S
    Wonder what improvements are possible though? 80-500? 100-600 4.5-8? 0.5x macro? Reduction in size to 1kg?
  • @zajicekpavel
    @zajicekpavel replied to the thread Show your Bird Portraits.
    Motacilla cinerea (Grey Wagtail) R7 photo https://adobe.ly/4o1uK3s
  • B
    Im afraid any aperture increase will be a significant size and weight increase and im not sure Canon will do that. The main selling...
  • @zajicekpavel
    taken last summer with R10... https://adobe.ly/4nZVsJF https://adobe.ly/4vmqTAp
  • @zajicekpavel
    AlanF: thank you very much for the advice, it is really useful for me, because I have been shooting for a short time (a year with the...
  • AlanF
    AlanF replied to the thread What’s Coming Next from Canon?.
    It's more nuanced than that. For difficult shots of birds or dragonflies in flight, I would use the RF 100-500mm (which I too highly...
  • AlanF
    AlanF replied to the thread What’s Coming Next from Canon?.
    I have had the the R7, R5, R5ii and RF 100-500 and RF 200-800mm since they first came out, and have taken 100s of 1000s of bird photos...
  • B
    RF-S 19-42 5.6-7.1
  • Ian K
    Optically the rf 100-500 is excellent. however using it with an extender is significantly annoying. It just won’t collapse completely. A...
  • @zajicekpavel
    yes 1.3 EV exactly physically... yes, FF wins hands down in low light at weddings, take a little bird in the sun photographed with an...
  • neuroanatomist
    The difference would still be 1.3-stops worth of noise. ISO 6400 on the 85 MP FF sensor will still look like ISO 2500 on the 32 MP APS-C...
  • K
    I would love an RF-S 15-150mm to use with my R10 as a compact travel kit. The 18-150 is just not wide enough. I end up using my R8 with...
  • Y
    RF24-300 F3.5-5.6 L IS USM RF50-400 F4-6.3 L IS USM both support extenders.
  • @zajicekpavel
    here we are at the heart of the problem. R5 will probably never have 80-85 MP, why? because then it would have the same pixel density as...
  • Click
    Click replied to the thread Dragonflies and Damselflies.
    That's a really very nice photo. I understand your frustration, but you did a great job with that lens.
  • neuroanatomist
    In this context, dynamic range is really a surrogate for image noise. Perhaps you usually shoot in 'proper lighting' (by which I think...
    • 100-500L by ISO.png
    • 100-300L by ISO.png
  • E
    and when was the EF 100-400 III released? exactly. why would the 100-500 need a refresh
  • AlanF
    AlanF replied to the thread Dragonflies and Damselflies.
    Banded Demoiselles for me today - and I didn't forget the 100-500mm!
    • 6L8A1847-DxO_Male_Banded_demoiselle.jpg
    • 6L8A1951-DxO_Banded_demoiselle_flying.jpg
  • AlanF
    I went out today Banded Demoiselle hunting and took the R 100-500mm on the R5ii. This is a crop of one of the images not downscaled. To...
    • 6L8A2014-DxO_Banded_demoiselle_flying.jpg
  • J
    I could not have said it better myself!!! :)
  • P
    I'd be extremely happy with a never seen before 35-135 F2 :).
  • D
    Del Paso replied to the thread Dragonflies and Damselflies.
    One of the rare times when I left home without the 100-500...( 70-200 instead) 😭
    • 1J6A2778-Bearbeitet-Bearbeitet.jpg
  • Filter

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    37,473
    Messages
    975,042
    Members
    24,816
    Latest member
    GLBDD

    Gallery statistics

    Categories
    1
    Albums
    29
    Uploaded media
    372
    Embedded media
    1
    Comments
    25
    Disk usage
    1 GB