firecrest
R5m2 + RF 200-800
@ 1/4000s, f/9

A Reed Bunting in the reeds (R5ii + RF 200-800mm).

The poor, lowly junco is almost never the star here...

"Junco"

EOS R1, RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM + RF 1.4x Extender @ 700mm, 1/2000 s, f/10, ISO 2000

Canon Rumors said:

I wanted to mention that no animals in this film were baited. The first comments on Facebook were ridiculous. I know, it's Facebook.

Yes, there are hides around the Boreal Forest for photography that do bait the animals. It is more than possible to head out and shoot without doing so. It just takes extra work, being up crazy early and spending all day outside. Some days it won't work out, other days it will.

Note: No debating the topic of baiting, it's a fool's errand. I avoid it at all costs.

Click to expand...

Debaiting?

Maximilian said:

Seems that competition is... DOOMED!

Click to expand...

Nikon is doomed to be a distant #3 in market share, but their Imaging division is profitable so they will continue to carry on.

Maximilian said:

Seems that competition is... DOOMED!

Click to expand...

Put differently: Canon are DOOMED to be number 1 !

justaCanonuser said:

As I have written, swivel displays are often a bit dark in really bright environments, at least that's my experience. A real classic waist-level viewfinder also doesn't suffer from disturbing reflections. So I am sure that there are photographers out there who would appreciate such a camera design.

Click to expand...

Perhaps I can improvise and add some ‘side panels’ to the LCD display to improve outdoor visibility.

Etnaphele said:

I don't know if this word is still even used, but that's just not hipster enough! Too much digital garbage, don't you long for the Canon-flavoured ANALOGUE XPERIENCE? Don't mind the tiny sensor put in there just to call that a camera

Click to expand...

There was an optional waist-level finder for the Canon F-1.

Someone should make a better pocket size camera - bring the OM Tough concept to the next level. Why not Canon? On backpacking trips, caoeing, skiing and more I always have my OM tg-7 handy, even if I most of the time also bring a system camera (R5ii). A large portion of my best pictures is taken with the compact - just because its always ready, independent of the weather and the situation. It`s a long time since I had a small Canon in my pockets. Olympus/OM has done a great job, but I miss a camera with higher image quality. Why not Canon, there must be a marked out here.

Beautiful, Norman.

Male Purple-throated Woodstar seen while birding at La Florida, Bosque de Las Aves, at km 18, Colombia, November, 2025.

R5MkII RF200-800mm

neuroanatomist said:

Totally. Canon has done that before, like when they touted the “Front part of the zoom ring sports a silver ring for a luxury touch,” in reference to that amazing lens the EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III. But stingy Canon hit that awesome lens with the cripple hammer and removed that luxury touch when they re-released the lens with an RF mount.

Personally, I prefer the lighter weight of the ‘engineering plastic’ used in many current L-series lenses, and the lenses feel good in the hand and don’t end up with paint chip ‘decorations’ all over.

Click to expand...

I’m not a mechanical type person, so I don’t know for sure if some parts of my G7X III are either metal or engineered plastic. Specifically, the control ring, on/off button, shutter release button, EV exposure offset dial and mode dial. On a coin toss bet, I would say metal.

There are some very fine details in either knurls, crosshatch knurls or ‘concentric rings’ in the mentioned parts.

To put things into perspective, on my attachment, the white silkscreened index mark is ~0.03 inch (~0.76 mm) wide on the short dimension. (I have a steel ruler with 1, 0.1 and 0.01 inch (25.4, 2.54 and 0.254 mm) tick marks. I’m nearsighted with a -7 diopter prescription and can clearly see the 1/100 inch tick marks with my eyeglasses off.)

I am probably an outlier, but I wish for a Spatial Video compact camera. I think Canon had a VR180 prototype in the past, but I wish for something along the lines of an all-in-one RF-S 7.8mm f/4 STM Dual Lens—with a body situation. Not long ago, Canon partnered with Apple to support the Apple Projected Media Profile (APMP) within Canon’s VR ecosystem. I’m in this space myself, so here’s to wishing…

brent1395 said:

Or, hear me out, Canon could revive what was one of the best compact systems of all time--the M series. Of course that ship has sailed, but the way that company handled that system was such a lost opportunity.

Click to expand...

They could have used the M100/M200 body as the basis of a new compact fixed lens camera.

"new technologies or a new use case"

I hope it's nothing weird like the PowerShot PICK or PowerShot ZOOM Telescope.

AlanF said:

The US Buzzards I've seen have ugly red faces;

View attachment 228209View attachment 228210

Click to expand...

Juveniles have a blackish head and a black bill.

mangobutter said:

one thing i hope canon recognizes that it needs to look good. lots of steel. lots of metal. lots of metallic. stop with the black plastic blobs.

Click to expand...

I thought they did a bang up job with the M5, G5X & G1Xiii. The mini tank/dslr style worked pretty well for those of us with larger mitts. I'd like to see a return to that form factor. Engineering plastic is fine just give me a viewfinder please! 1 inch stacked sensor, the V1 lens but just 2.8, a tilty flippy...hmm, this thing is getting chubbier by the moment.

mangobutter said:

one thing i hope canon recognizes that it needs to look good. lots of steel. lots of metal. lots of metallic. stop with the black plastic blobs.

Click to expand...

Totally. Canon has done that before, like when they touted the “Front part of the zoom ring sports a silver ring for a luxury touch,” in reference to that amazing lens the EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III. But stingy Canon hit that awesome lens with the cripple hammer and removed that luxury touch when they re-released the lens with an RF mount.

Personally, I prefer the lighter weight of the ‘engineering plastic’ used in many current L-series lenses, and the lenses feel good in the hand and don’t end up with paint chip ‘decorations’ all over.

one thing i hope canon recognizes that it needs to look good. lots of steel. lots of metal. lots of metallic. stop with the black plastic blobs.

Amazing details.

foda said:

Early European colonizers couldn't tell the difference between that bird and this bird, which is why the Turkey Vulture is usually called a Buzzard in the U.S.

View attachment 228208

Click to expand...

The US Buzzards I've seen have ugly red faces;

Exploreshootshare said:

Omg, that weight saving would be insane, probably a record saving nearly 1 kg... crazy

Click to expand...

Yup…specially now, that I added the 45mm f/1.2 to my kit, which means I’ll always have something faster available in my bag and in my standard range, but the 28-70 is fully paid so, at least for now, it stays. Also, it’s not that it’d make much of a difference with my cameras, but this idea implies a downgrade, which would need to be very well considered. The 28-70mm f/2 is my most used lens for work.

The 45 1.2 is a complementary lens to me, hence going with such a budget option instead of, for instance, a VCM prime. The emphasis of my working kit is on the 28-70. If I replaced my main lens with a slower and lower end option, I’d probably have to reconsider the quality of the prime lens to go with it as well.

These lenses definitely reach new heights. It’s not just about specs, they can revolutionise entire kits for many users. To me, the 28-70 f/2 replaced two f/1.4 Art Primes and the EF 24-70 II. I actually sold three lenses after getting it.

I could imagine a 28-45mm f/1.2 going for 8~10k though

Del Paso said:

The loss of quality as well...

Click to expand...

Insane loss of quality? To be honest, with my cameras, I doubt. I’d be more concerned with the retractable mechanism, weather sealing and autofocus performance (the f/2 zoom is very, very capable regarding low light autofocus).

Exploreshootshare said:

Omg, that weight saving would be insane, probably a record saving nearly 1 kg... crazy

Click to expand...

The loss of quality as well...