Report: New Canon Super Telephoto Lenses Coming in May
The amazing lightness of Sony's 300mm f/2.8 is something I'm jealous of and it's much cheaper than Canon's 100-300mm f/2.8: USD 6,800 vs 10,600The same was true for the EF 400/5.6 L being superseded by the 100-400mm ii. The 100-300 is fine for you youngsters, but the 2.7kg working weight is above my 2.1kg limit for carrying and hand holding. I do prefer zooms but age limits me to the lighter ones.
Also the Canon zoom is quite front heavy compared to a prime as I found out when I tried it out along with the RF400mm f/2.8. The 400 actually felt lighter to handhold even though it's half a kg heavier as the centre of mass is much closer to the camera.
I still much preferred the RF 100-300mm f/2.8 though as I missed too many shots of birds in the NZ bush (on Tiritiri Matangi Island) with the 400 either because the bird was closer than the minimum focus distance or the 400mm was too tight a FOV and these were usually the best shots as nothing beats getting super close to the bird in my opinion.
Upvote
0










