Patent: Diffractive Optics Element Improvements

HTML:
We continue to see new patent applications for diffractive optics technology. We’re all still waiting to see if the EF 600mm f/4 DO IS will become an actual consumer product, or if Canon is going to take things in a different direction.</p>
<p><strong>From <a href="https://www.canonnews.com/canon-patent-application-diffractive-optical-element-improvements">Canon News</a>:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>Canon describes how to manufacturer a diffractive optical element with a refractive resin component attached to it to further reduce chromatic aberrations.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>From US Patent Application <a href="http://pdfaiw.uspto.gov/.aiw?PageNum=0&docid=20180143350">20180143350</a>:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>in a refractive optical system using the refraction of light, lenses formed from glass materials having different dispersion characteristics are used together in combination to reduce the chromatic aberration. For example, in the case of an object lens of a telescope or the like, a glass material having low dispersion and a glass material having high dispersion are used in combination as a positive lens and a negative lens, respectively, to correct the chromatic aberration which appears on the axis.</p></blockquote>
<p>The goal of diffractive optics lenses is to reduce the physical size of the lenses. This could help in a couple of areas such as smaller and lighter supertelephoto lenses and to reduce the size of longer fast lenses for full frame mirrorless applications.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

5D Mk4, 6D Mk2, 7D Mk2, 80D and 5D Mk 3 compared for Wildlife photography

Grant Atkinson said:
Hi Ah Keong
I dont have any plans right now to include the 1DX Mark 2 in such a comparison although i probably should. If had to try sum up very roughly,though, the 1DX Mark 2 compared to the 5D Mark 4, we find that viewfinder autofocus is quite similar on both (though the 1DX Mark 2 is much better if you use EF Extenders), and without extenders the 1DX Mark 2 may focus a tiny bit faster. The !DX Mark 2 has its autofocus system illuminate in red in the viewfinder which can be an advantage if you shoot in the dark. Where a big difference exists is the frame rate, as 7 fps is only just fast enough for action whereas the 1DX Mark 2 is about as fast as will likely ever need. The shorter shutter lag, shorter viewfinder blackout on the 1DX Mark 2 also makes for a faster response, and then the other big difference for action photography is the buffer capacity. On the 1DX Mark 2 we never even get close to filling the buffer, even using a CF card, whereas the 5D Mark4 has a decent buffer but if there is continuous action happening, we do need to keep one eye on the buffer to try avoid filling it at a critical time. When it comes to image quality, if you view or use the images at the same output size, by printing them at the same physical size, or by viewing them on the same size screen, without cropping, then we find that the 1DX Mark 2 images are only incrementally better when it comes to noise at high iso. Perhaps a third of stop. But they are so close in image quality that we dont consider that a big differentiator. If one needs to crop heavily then the 5D Mark 4 holds an advantage. DPAF function is about the same in both cameras for stills, but for video the fully functional touch screen of the 5D Mark 4 may be better than the limited function touch screen of the 1DX Mark 2. The 1DX Mark 2 has superior video frame rate and resolution choices. When it comes to ergonomics the 1DX Mark 2 is larger and can be even more deeply configured. Hope something there helps..
Cheers
Grant

Thanks for the great summary , Sir! ;D
I really like the AF squares lighting in RED. Hope they would add it in the "7D Mark III"
Upvote 0

LensTip review: Nikon AF-S 180-400 mm f/4E TC1.4 FL ED VR

ahsanford said:
AlanF said:
Read further on in the report - they found it weak in the field with the D500: "That weaker performance can be noticed not only in photos of our testing charts or measurements but also in our sample shots. With the lens and the D3x set, where you deal with a full frame 24 Mpix sensor, the photos taken at 550 mm and examined in the 1:1 scale might seem to be still of good quality but if you shot them with a much more densely packed sensor of the Nikon D500 you can feel unsatisfied. "

Sure, in that comparison, that's like -- at least pixel density-wise -- hearing 5D3 people would be fine with it but 5DS people wouldn't. That's not a surprising find at all.

- A

Well, my 400mm DO II is tack sharp with both a 1.4xTC and a 2xTC on a 5DSR and there are 7DII birders in this group who are very happy with the 1.4xTC and 400mm DO as well as 500 and 600mm so I find it surprising.

To add more from Lenstip:
“To be honest when I took the tested lens attached to the Nikon D500 for an outdoor session I spent a lot of time trying to calibrate the autofocus at the 550 mm focal length in many different ways. The photos I got simply seemed so fuzzy to me that I suspected some front- or back-focus problems. There were no such problems after all and the impression of fuzziness was created by the huge contrast between the performance at 400 mm, excellent indeed, and quite average results you get when you employ the teleconverter. ”
Upvote 0

70-200 2.8 with 2x tele vs 100-400mk2 with 1.4 tele

Thanks for the replys. To clarify my kit will be the 7d2. 24-70 2.8. Sigma 10-20 3.5 and either the 70-2-- with 2x(mk111) or the 100-400mk2 with 1.4km3. will also have a 700d as backup (most likely with the sigma attatched) My concern is the 100-400 with 1.4 is reduced to centre point AF and at f8 AF will undoubtedly be slower and my thought is that when I return having the 70-200 2.8 is very handy. I do shoot a fair bit of wildlife but am getting into some pet photography to earn a bit of money on the side. Both lenses would actually be very good for that but I am leaning toward the 70-200 as the more useful. The Sigma was a great lens(for the price it is stunning really) but Focusing speed required a lot of skill to work with as it is 6.3 at the long end as well as being a 3rd party lens with 3rd party communication issues. Just how much am I giving up in IQ with the 2x tele on the 70-200?
Upvote 0

Canon Will Sell You Their 120mp APS-H Image Sensor

ethanz said:
Mt Spokane Photography said:
takesome1 said:
Is there no one with the nerve to request a price quote?
They are looking to sell to a real customer. Supply your D&B number and they will confirm that you are capable of $1M purchases and have the Engineering staff to use the sensor.
The company I worked for had salesmen scouring the world for customers, but one day, a guy walked in and asked to buy our product. In today's dollars that would be $500 million each. No one believed he was serious, that couldn't happen, but it was real and he had the money and bought the product.

We need H.F. ;)


OKIE DOKIE! Teledyne Dalsa...$35,000 US for 5000 CMOS sensors much larger than
a Full Frame with 45 nm or 90 nm DSP circuits.

Global Foundries ... $800 US for FF chips with 45 nm or less DSP process on 100,000 sensor order.

Sony... $2.85 U.S. for 1/1.xx for two million sensor order.

ON Semiconductor $15.00 US for 2/3rds inch chip for a 500,000 order

ONLY Teledyne Dalsa can get me the higher end chips that can take up an entire 300mm wafer for 8k/16k resolution CMOS sensors. They also let you pay in order blocks of 500 chips so it's only $17.5 million US per block! Good enough for us!
Upvote 0

The 5DsR mk2

unfocused said:
Could some of those lost jobs have been saved if Canon and Nikon has placed greater priority on solving connectivity issues? We will never know. But, I'm willing to bet that at least a few unemployed staff photographers wish they had tried.

I very much doubt connectivity would have made a difference. People sending smartphone pictures is free. A photographer - and the paper would have had to pay the network charges for the photographer.

unfocused said:
As to your point about the technical difficulties. Sorry, I don't buy it. Not when you look at the size of the typical smart phone.
You mentioned it right there. Size. A phone is smaller than camera and does a good enough job for most people.

"Hmm... I have a phone that has photo capabilities, or I can take my new-fangled camera that has internet capability but no phone"
Which do you think wins out?

But my main point was the technology - I often take the reductionist approach which would be "if the technology is available right now, why haven't they...". I think 'because they can't be bothered is too simplistic.
Someone has gone to the trouble of developing the Eyefi card but even that is only a link to a phone. Why have they not designed one to connect to the internet like a phone card?

If internet capability is as important to pros as you say, do you think camera manufacturers wouldn't be trampling over themselves to build it in? Maybe they have asked pros and there are things more important. Maybe the pros don't even think it is on their radar as an important functionality so don't ask for it. Maybe if the manufacturers put their minds to it, they could overcome all the technological hurdles and do it but they have more important things to do.
Put all that together and there is a very strong argument that although people like the opportunity to post to Instagram within 10 seconds of taking the photo, in cameras vs phone battle is matters squat.
Upvote 0

Canon Germany Summer Promotion - May 17th until August 31st 2018

I forgot to mention, that the "EOS plus X" promo is still active, so you can combine selected bodies with selected lenses and get cash back. See here: https://www.canon.de/lens-promo/

And if I read the conditions of participation of the summer promo right those two can be combined.
But please check the details yourself.
Upvote 0

Question for landscapers

You didn’t say whether you shoot crop or full frame. When I bought my 40D it came with the 17-85 lens. My first lens purchase was the 50mm 1.8. I needed it when I went to Fort Langley, I needed the 1.8 aperature to shoot inside the buildings without flash. My next lens purchase was the 70-200 f4 IS USM I also purchased a 1.4 Extender at the same time. This was an excellent combination and I got many sharp shots of BIF. I blundered and bought a 2X Extender a couple of years later. I wasted my money. The pictures were too soft. Wanting the reach I bought the 100-400 vs 1 a few years before the vs 2 came out. I love my copy and am very happy. I like the push pull zoom feature and haven’t noticed any dust problem. Good luck in deciding which lens to purchase! As I now have 3 lens that have 67 mm Filter thread mount my next lens might be the 18-135 Nano to replace my aging 17-85 lens.
Upvote 0

Another EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III Mention [CR2]

ethanz said:
privatebydesign said:
Personally I’d prefer a less sharp lens that has the much smoother bokeh of the IS MkI, but I know I won’t get it so I’ll stick with my old MkI.

Could you please show me some examples of the difference in bokeh between I and II? I'm curious.

Sure.

Below are four edited images from the first page of the 70-200 f2.8 IS MkII thread here on this site, I have marked the areas I find distracting. http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=819.0

Now I'm not saying this kind of thing never happens with the MkI, it does, but it happens a lot less often; and whilst there is no doubt the MkII is sharper than the MkI I, personally, find this kind of hard background pattern extremely distracting.

There are very few images on the board here for the MkI lens but look here and tell me how many images you see with the same kind of distracting background elements? I don't see any on the first half a dozen pages. https://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/canonef70200f28isusm/page2

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    83.4 KB · Views: 113
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    42.3 KB · Views: 117
  • 3.jpg
    3.jpg
    38.2 KB · Views: 109
  • 4.jpg
    4.jpg
    64.9 KB · Views: 118
Upvote 0

Industry News: Canon on Reframing the Business to Avoid Further Smartphone Disruption

Old Sarge said:
Once I stopped to photograph a grizzly sow and cub in Yellowstone National Park at a bear jam. Sensing that she was about to cross the road myself and another man crossed the road first and he set up his tripod on a small hill a safe distance from where we expected the grizzly to cross. I hadn't had time to get my tripod out of the back off the SUV so was shooting handheld. I was using my longest lens and I expect he was also. But the best laid plans of mice and men...the grizzly and cub crossed the road where we expected but it crossed at an angle which meant our safe distance was not quite as safe as we had thought.

The other shooter looked at me and said, "We are WAY too close to that bear." My reply to him was, "No, we are too close to the bear. Those folks in front of us (by about forty yards) with iPods and smart phones are WAY too close to the bear." We made our way down the hill and back across the road to our vehicles fully protected by a wall of tourists with iPods.

Great story. Same group was at a recent wedding, stepping into the aisle behind the ceremony, holding their TABLETS way up to get video.
Upvote 0

Sigma Announces Pricing & Availability for Its 70mm F2.8 DG MACRO Art Lens

mb66energy said:
If it were
50mm and
f/2.0 and
image stabilized
it would fill a hole in my lens setup and maybe could replace EF-S 2.8 60 for APS-C and EF 2.8 40
and the hypthetical EF 1.4 50 IS for both sensor formats.

Totally agree!

Hope Sigma would release a 50mm and 100mm f/2 OS DG HSM Macro duet! :P
Upvote 0

Industry News: FujiFilm Announces the Instax Square SQ6

HTML:
<p><strong>Valhalla, N.Y., May 14, 2018</strong> – <a href="http://www.fujifilmusa.com/products/instax/index.html" target="article-0067965594"><strong>FUJIFILM North America Corporation</strong></a> today announced the first SQUARE format analog INSTAX camera, in the FUJIFILM Instax instant camera line, the new <strong>INSTAX® SQUARE SQ6</strong>, a sleek and sophisticated square format instant film camera for instant square prints. The square format film provides a wider photo range with 1:1 aspect ratio. This allows for more room to set the scene, enabling capture of the subject<strong>,</strong> its background and extending the range of artistic expression.</p>
<p>“We are very excited to bring our first square format analog INSTAX camera to market,” says Manny Almeida, President, Imaging Division, FUJIFILM North America Corporation. “The SQ6 is an affordable and attractive option from the INSTAX line of instant cameras to capture real-life moments with a creative twist.”</p>
<p>To celebrate the release of the new INSTAX SQUARE SQ6, Fujifilm together with iHeart Radio, will hold an exclusive, private launch event, “A Night in NY,” on May 15<sup>th</sup> at West Edge in New York City. The event will feature experiential spaces to create custom, photo shareable content to immerse guests in curated experiences with INSTAX cameras, including the new SQ6. Hosted by Z100’s Danielle Monaro, “A Night in NY” will also feature an intimate performance by singer-songwriter MAX, #1 hit song “Lights Down Low.”</p>
<p>Along with the SQ6, instax SQUARE black instant film will also be released. With its new black frame, users can enjoy added creativity, perfect for a wide array of DIY projects.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p><strong>Available in Three Beautiful Colors</strong></p>
<p>The SQ6 is available in three stylish colors, Pearl White, Blush Gold and Graphite Gray.</p>
<p><strong>Variety of Features for Enhanced Creativity</strong></p>
<p>The new SQ6 is equipped with various features that allow users to be more creative. With auto exposure control, the high performance flash automatically calculates the surrounding brightness and adjusts shutter speed to capture both the subject and background with clarity, even when shooting in low light conditions, such as indoors or at a party. Three color filters that fit over the flash in orange, purple and green are included to add a pop of color to the images. Additionally, the camera can be set to a selfie mode which automatically adjusts focus and brightness. For added usability when taking selfies, a small mirror is located next to the lens to ensure accurate capture. Group photos are made easy with the built in timer and the added tripod socket located at the bottom of the camera<strong>.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Three Unique Modes to Capture Any Moment</strong></p>
<p>To ensure capture of any moment, the SQ6 offers three unique modes. The double exposure mode is capable of superimposing two images onto a single film when the shutter button is pressed twice. The macro mode allows users to capture beautiful close-up images of subjects as close as 30cm and the landscape mode can be used to capture impressive scenic photos.</p>
<p><strong>INSTAX SQUARE SQ6 </strong><strong>Key Features:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Available in three colors, Pearl White, Blush Gold and Graphite Gray.</li>
<li>Compatible with FUJIFILM INSTAX SQUARE film (purchased separately).</li>
<li>Picture size – 62mm x 62mm/2.4in. x 2.4in.</li>
<li>Retractable lens, 2 components, 2 elements, f = 65.75 mm, 1:12.6.</li>
<li>Inverted Galilean finder, 0.4 x, with target spot.</li>
<li>Three motor driven focus modes: Macro Mode (0.3m – 0.5m/1ft. -1.6ft.), Normal Mode (0.5m – 2m/1.6ft. – 6.6ft.), Landscape Mode (2m/6.6ft. and beyond).</li>
<li>Programmed electronic shutter release, 1.6 sec – 1/400 sec.</li>
<li>Automatic, Interlocking range (ISO 800): LV 5 – LV 15.5, Exposure compensation: ± 2/3 EV.</li>
<li>Electronically controlled self-timer with approximately 10 second delay</li>
<li>LED display with Shooting mode (auto, selfie, macro, landscape, double exposure), brightness adjustment, flash suppressing and self-timer mode.</li>
<li>Two CR2/DL CR2 lithium batteries.
<ul>
<li>Capacity: Approximately 30 INSTAX SQUARE 10-pack film packs with new CR2/DL CR2 lithium batteries.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Tripod socket (tripod sold separately).</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Availability and Pricing</strong></p>
<p>The Instax SQUARE SQ6 will be available on May 25, 2018 in the U.S. and Canada for USD $129.95 and CAD $159.99.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Sigma 500mm f4 on 5D mark 4

I think it will come down to personal preference and also places you visit. In my case, Masai Mara (Kenya) and Botswana are the places I tend to prefer much.

I could've gone for the option of getting a nice second hand 200-400 instead of the Canon 500 II I have now, but I decided the combination of a lightweight yet good quality 100-400 in combination with the 500 would be ideal for me. Quite like it so far :)
Upvote 0

Firmware: Canon EF 200-400mm f/4L IS 1.4x v1.1.0

I upgraded my lens with the 1.1.0 firmware and it caused nothing but problems. There is a very audible clunking sound as the lens tries to focus which was never there on the 1.0.0 firmware. Additionally the lens DOES NOT focus as fast as it did before and it searches more for focus regardless of the focus mode (single point, 5 point cross, 9 point grid) and as a result it is not as consistently sharp as it was before on the 1.0.0 version firmware.

I tried to have Canon Support send me the 1.0.0 firmware so I could go back to the base firmware but they said they could not do it. They told me to take the lens in for repair. Not so easy since I have daily assignments for my newspaper on which I use this lens extensively.

Totally unhappy with the 1.1.0 firmware update. My advice is DO NOT install the 1.1.0 firmware unless you are really experiencing problems with your lens.
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,439
Messages
973,619
Members
24,804
Latest member
chrisgphoto

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB