Any advices for RF 24-240 mm?
- Canon Lenses
- 21 Replies
Yes.What about the extender and EF converter? I mean can I use my EF 70-200 F/2.8 m2 with 2x on R5m2?
Upvote
0
Yes.What about the extender and EF converter? I mean can I use my EF 70-200 F/2.8 m2 with 2x on R5m2?
I didn't mean all would buy the top lens. But more cameras sale must help to sell all lens.I'm not following the logic on how a top ten list of full frame lenses costing around $2,000 are due to ZV-E10 costing less than the R50. No one buying the apsc ZV-E10 or R50 is buying any of these expensive full frame lenses.
i did it all and then send my camera Canon Turkey Tecnical Service. My camera's sensor is not working in full performance. They said to me it has to change with new sensor. This is not good for me...
And it's just that lack of sustained interest that is why the DYOC never makes it to production...This thread seems to have run it’s course. Thanks @neuroanatomist your DYOC scheme was good for a few laughs.
Kind of a fun mental, detective-like exercise...and good, early knowledge sticks better...and sometimes the searches yield unexpected facts.
And as always, this is a RUMORS site!
=====
Indeed the jpegs and HEIF files can come with or without RAW.
"The R5 has no such equivalent mode and the new implementation is more elegant than the one added to the EOS R6 II, in that it saves regular JPEG or HEIFs, with and without Raw files"
Canon used to mention ‘tripod-sensing’ regarding their lenses. They’ve been silent on that feature for RF lenses. I wouldn’t hold your breath waiting for a fix. Just turn off IS when you’re on a tripod.Actually for me sounds like a software bug. And should be repairable with a simple update.
I hope that one day Canon will fix that.
Thank you MUCH.I just watched your Africa film, and I have to say, it really captured the essence of the place. The vibrant colors and stunning landscapes brought back memories of my own trip there a few years ago. I love how you’ve used natural sounds to complement the visuals—it adds an authentic touch.
I remember when I took a filmmaking course at a film institute in Prague; they emphasized how important storytelling is in capturing a viewer's attention, and you've done a fantastic job with that!
If I had to suggest anything, maybe consider tightening up a few transitions for smoother flow. But honestly, I think it's great as it is!

I'm unclear on the relationship between DxO and DxOMark. I think the business model of the latter is to sell the evaluation suite and/or data primarily to makers/consumers of small sensors (mobile, automotive, automation, security), and they measure ILC sensors because DxO has them for their software business.Absolutely! Just about all combined scores from evaluation sites are pretty suspect as the weighting of the individual component scores is subjective, but DxO is something else. Still, we can forgive them as they have given us Prime and DeepPrime.
That rumour was CR2!!But probably cheaper (i.e. less expensive) than the 14-21mm f1.4 UWA zoomlens in this patent:
![]()
Is the ultimate astro lens coming? Another RF 14-21mm f/1.4L USM mention [CR2] - Canon Rumors
I have been told to expect a “world's first” wide-angle zoom lens from Canon in the next few months, the official announcement date and shipping date are unknown at this time. The source claims that a Canon RF 14-21mm f/1.4L USM is currently being tested by select photographers. We've seen a...www.canonrumors.com
Panamoz is selling it for the exact price I can get it for locallyOr check local stores and grey import.... As far as I know there's excess of 200-800 in HK.
Oh yeah... We'll have to build a new Noah's Ark just to save ourselves from that flood.I'm sure the current version of the RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS will likely flood the used market if and when an internal focus version of this lens is released.
@Canon Rumors Guy did point to WEX, our major on-line retailer, is expanding bricks and mortar stores in the UK, and I can confirm they have opened one in my small city.So if you wanted to add constructively to my comment, you could have pointed to the European chains that are expanding, and in which countries.
That is WAY too long to keep desktop computers for production, I've worked in the IT industry for 25 years and have never let equipment go more than 5 years without replacement. After 5 years the probability of a work-stoppage failure increases dramatically. I will only keep servers in production as long as I can maintain a 4-hour mission-critical warranty on them (hardware craps out the vendor has the replacement part to you within 4 hours), once I am told I have to go to a basic hardware warranty the server gets replaced. I also disagree that computers do not change that much, there are significant changes that go deeper than processor speeds and cores. I will concede the changes were perhaps a little more significant in the earlier days of computing.You must be living in a tech fantasy world. Tech moves and improves fast when it is new. As it matures, advances slow. Use a TV for a year or two and then throw it away? If that is what you do then you are obviously far more well off economically than the average consumer, but are apparently gullible to tech hype. I've been working on computers since the late 1980's. It was quite necessary to upgrade our computers frequently, perhaps every 2 to 3 years in those early days. Now it maybe 10 years - or more. I believe my company has upgraded my computer twice since 2000. And we are talking about an Engineering company that needs fairly high powered computers. The reality is that computers haven't changed much in the last decade or 12 years. Nor TVs. The same thing is happening in cameras. It's OK to want or be excited about the latest tech, but small minor advances are the reality for mature tech.
he sent me proof but he wants me too buy the kit today and wait which is kinda uncomfy too meI would like to point out that this user you're messaging has 4 posts to their profile. Proceed with caution.