Hi sootzzs,
I bought it from Wex Photographics online (they have a showroom in Norwich), but as I mentioned I had a 10% discount code to use that they sent me as a customer and newsletter subscriber. So it made their price go from £399 to £359.
Otherwise as you say the Amazon UK price is probably going to be the lowest but I agree it's probably best in your case to check one out in a store. I like Park Cameras as a company too and they have a store in London.
dolina said:Happy Flag Day Rocky, pls dotn get mad.Rocky said:My refrigerator is made in U.S.A. with a lot of components made in somewhere else.![]()
Click said:Hi Dylan,
Thanks for the link.
Very funny ;D
geonix said:;D
I like the "Still misses most of the shots" especially.
+1 ;D
daniv79 said:Hi there,
I lost my great hood for the 16-35 f4 IS.
But I can just find the original EW-82 on internet and it's about 50€!
Anyone who found any fake one from China that could match?
Thank you very much in advance
Mt Spokane Photography said:East Wind Photography said:Mt Spokane Photography said:East Wind Photography said:We are also dealing with a Chinese company here so what we do here in the states and what they do may be completely different.
The credit card companies call the shots, they publish a extensive set of requirements that sellers must follow. They have issues a common set of rules that apply Globally, no matter what country you are in. If you want to accept Visa, MasterCard, Discover, AMEX, you must abide by them, and the rules require a independent verification that you are following the rules.
That's one of the reasons that I finally stopped taking credit cards last July. It had become expensive for a small business. There are indeed different procedures for Brick and Mortar, but everyone is connected to the internet now, and card data is transmitted over the internet, so the computer security is very tight (Some still don't get it).
The PCI Data Security Standard
PCI DSS is the global data security standard adopted by the payment card brands for all entities that
process, store or transmit cardholder data and/or sensitive authentication data. It consists of steps that
mirror security best practices.
https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/documents/PCISSC%20QRG%20August%202014%20-print.pdf
Yes but there are some that still get around that practice...for example..I go into a restaurant to buy food, I never have anyone ask me for my billing address. When I order online some but not everyone ask for the CID...which I thought was a requirement.
Anyway, I think we can say for the fees charged, the system still is not perfect.
The billing address is optional, and a cid check is also optional. Its up to the business. PCI deals more with security of data and protecting credit card numbers. In cases where a customer I have dealt with for years places a order with just his card number, I don't bother him for the CID, I just turn the check off for him. Another thing about the address check, is that its just for the zip code. I don't know why, but that's all the card companies provide to the gateway companies for a address check. They all act as though its a check of the address, but its not. Scammers know this. I can set it to the basic 5 digit code or the zip plus 4 (US customers). When accepting International credit cards, many banks still do not have all the data online, or its unreliable, so its common to ask for a scan of some ID.
If a business is not worried about a customer, they are allowed to take the risk, but are fined for a excessive number of chargebacks. Those engaging in professional fraud are usually looking for something in high demand, cameras, lenses, video games, smart phones, anything they can resell quickly and easily.
lion rock said:Nice! Very nice!
-r
firegs said:Is anyone else starting to think Photographyblog is purposely putting out crappy images? Are they on Sony's payroll? What the heck gives with these terrrrible pictures?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Hector1970 said:You should consider a second hand 17-40 F4 L.
It's also a very good lens with a flexible range.
It would probably hold it's value until there is 16-35 L with IS.
jeffa4444 said:Lets see what you have to say at the end of 2015. If people like Jrista are convinced Sony are outperforming Canon and therefor prepared to sell Canon equipment to fund purchasing the Sony A7R II then you should take some notice he really understands the science behind the tool.
At the end of the day whats the really difference in concept? replacing the traditional mirror and optical viewfinder the rest is identical including form factor.