'Thanks' to the Bayer mask, it's not a matter of simply doubling the pixels. But seeing how well the updated Digic X in my R8 can downsample 24MP to 4k60, I'm not fearing a 60MP sensor doing 8k video. I do wonder how Canon is going to implement RAW video in that case, maybe they'll allow 60MP video and the user needs to make that 8k in post.But a 60mp sensor would be very undesirable for shooting video.
Look at these resolutions:
Sony 60mp: 9504 x 6336
Canon 45mp: 8192 x 5464
8K DCI: 8192 x 4320
4K DCI: 4096 x 2160
If we look at those horizontal resolutions, it's clear why there's a big problem with 60 mp. Using the Canon, I can shoot full width 8K and I can shoot full width 4K by simply pixel doubling.[...]
I also installed this into a computer: https://www.delock.com/produkt/91755/merkmale.html
That allows me to use the NVME tools under linux to inspect the cards. The downside to that: I'm using a consumer motherboard where PCIe hotplug doesn't work properly, so I have to reboot after inserting/removing a card![]()
I'm hyperventilating after reading that.I will be heard the bad guy now but what is the point to make a cooling grip when the competition doesn't need one and the recording times are huge without overheating... is it so hard for Canon to do something similiar? One week ago my R6 (C cam) stopped recording due to overheating at 1080p 50p while I was shooting an event at 37C under the sun. My old C100 Mark II never overheated, my C70 never does and also my bm 6k pro the same. Even the Canon EOS R didn't overheat or my old 5D4. I understand that some have internal fans and some were recording at 8-bit 420 (except my beloved c70 and also BM) but if competition can make it work with their MILC bodies then Canon should be able to follow! We use mics, cages, on camera LED lights and so much more and now we neew to add a heavy grip also, to be able to cool the camera! This is unacceptable IMO.
All wide-angle lenses rely on distortion correction.I strongly suspect that every future wide angle RF lens from Canon will rely on distortion correction, even a 35mm f/1.2L.
What are the Chinese company names?No, Kodak and Sony (who bought Minolta) license out to Chinese companies.
Kodak still makes film cameras though.
I’m sure they could have software that shifts ISO during zooming to seamlessly compensate the exposure change. People who buy crappy lenses probably also don’t care much about electronic noise issues. Like you mentioned, this seems like a way to sell a lot of cheap lenses to people who don’t know better.These seem like those terrible Sony power zoom lenses.
They seem to sell very well so I could see why Canon would copy them.
IMHO a variable aperture over such a short focal range makes a power zoom kind of useless.
A long focal range makes the aperture changes gradual.
I guess maybe these could zoom extra slowly.
You have hit on a 'weakness' in the way Canon implemented Version 1 of the add-on EVF for the M series of cameras. It tilts 'up'...and indeed tilting is a nice feature to have when needed. But since first grade, I've worn eyeglasses...and with this particular EVF I have discovered (I guess) that I often push my glasses right into contact with the viewfinder. It is not something that I notice.Personally, I would prefer to see a screen like the Sony A7RV that performs both tilt and vari-angle. I’m not very sure if I would use this feature at all, honestly. Hopefully it can lock securely in place if you don’t plan to use it.
Sorry, but I am in the same boat.You cannot compare a 600/4 with the 200-800mm
Just think of the camera as you would a printer. The lens is the ink.That is a lot of camera for the money, but in cinema, the money is in the glass, so the cameras don't need high margins. Looks like a really nice bit of work, though.
.....or maybe the second half of 2024!I think the variable teleconverter was rumored to be announced in parallel with the 200-500 mm f4 lens. The first half of 2024 is going to have a lot of announcements from Canon and other camera manufacturers.
Hopefully they will achieve that. I'm sure they can, but who knows?But only if it is as good as the RF 100, close and at infinity.
I hope this means good things for future releases as well, like the R5II.It's the most preordered Canon lens around these parts since the 100-500, small sample size, yes.