Great Photos opportunity for East coast of USA. to night.

deuce2367 said:
Good tip, saw this thread 20 minutes before launch. Not a great shot (only had my 35mm prime) but was happy with the result. View is from my neighbor's front yard, 6D with tripod.

-Deuce

IMG_20131120_011814_0003c1_zps940baac0.jpg

Wow, Wow, Wow, Dear Mr. deuce2367.
Your Photo is a lot better than NASA photo.
Thank you, Sir to post for all of us to see.
Surapon
Upvote 0

Zeiss 50 Makro-Planar used as a normal 50 -- Focus accuracy?

JohnDizzo15 said:
Viggo said:
Mine is on it's way, can't wait to check it out and have some fun with it.

Congrats, Viggo! Excited to see some shots.

Thanks! Fingers crossed it's here before the weekend! I have the EC-S focusing screen, but since it doesn't support metering and the VF goes dark with the 2470, I hope I don't need it.
Upvote 0

Full Frame only: Canon 5D Mark III or Canon 1Ds Mark III plus $500?

Using both on a day to day basis (1Ds3 in the studio at work & 5Diii own personal stuff including products and weddings) I'd say go for the 5Diii, better in every situation and the RAW's are much better to work with. the 1Ds3 is 5 years old and it feels it when put up against the 5Diii. I wouldn't swap my 5Diii for anything now. apart from when the 5Div or whatever comes out...
Upvote 0

New Technology Coming to Cinema EOS

dgatwood said:
This is a bit surprising. I'd have expected CFast to be completely dead at this point, given that nobody has adopted it after so many years, and given that its backwards compatibility story is nonexistent.

With SD's UHS-II offering very nearly the same performance as CFast 2.0, but providing full backwards and forwards compatibility with existing cards and readers, it seems like a much, much, much more sensible choice than CFast 2.0. CF is nonstandard enough as it is. It really doesn't make sense to go even further off the rails.

The problem with SD cards is they tend to be not quite as physically robust as CF style cards (leaving aside the pin problem), and they also don't have room for a significant amount of NAND dies, which means you either have more bits per cell, which tends to wear out quicker and take longer to re-program, or you have less capacity. Also the CF style cards can be significantly more like an SSD since it's based off of UDMA, which means support for things like TRIM command (which lets the CF controller reset cells so they can be written to quicker) and other similar features.
Upvote 0

What's my next purchase?

rmfagan said:
So 24-70 II is a great choice, and I need a second camera. Which do you think is the better buy first?

Depends on how many weddings you plan on doing. You'll use the 24-70 a lot for everything. You'll need a second camera when you do paid events. It might make more sense to rent a second body when you need it if you don't do that many events. And if you will be able to fund the 300 II next spring, it might make sense to get the 24-70 sooner, a second body if you need one in the summer and defer the purchase of the 300 II.
Upvote 0

Lens Firmware Update

Botts said:
neuroanatomist said:
Yes, the 6D would work.
Confirmed, just did it with my 6D despite Canon's documentation.

To add another data point, yes, this worked! ;D
Cheap as the lens is, was hesitant to go ahead till I read neuroanatomist's and Botts' replies! Canon really should update their documentation (after some internal testing).
Upvote 0

Cropping, image quality and ISO.

Mick said:
Im not the most technical person around so I wondered about this question a friend asked about cropping and image quality.

If I have a full frame camera, an aps-c and aps-h and take the same shot with the same lens same light etc printed at the same size say A3, what would give the best image quality when taking say a shot in poor light...

The full frame shot at ISO3200 would need to be cropped so degrading the image quality, fine detail etc but has a two stop advantage over the aps-c and one stop over the aps-h who would need to shoot at higher iso to match the full frames speed so degrading the image quality. The aps-c needed no cropping but its ISO performance is worse and the aps-h mid way between the two. So I guess a 1DX, 1D4 and 70D for arguments sake. I said id use the full frame as id get the shot I wouldnt get with the others as the image quality would be so bad anyway without any cropping even with post production.

The solution is to use the right lens if you are serious about IQ. Only if you are focal length limited would you purposely use a wide lens and crop to APS-C size.

I will crop if my 400mm plus 1.4X TC is not long enough, or if I have seconds to get a shot off and must use whatever lens is on the camera.

The person also needs to consider the converse, What would he do if he used the same lens on a APS-C or APS-H camera that filled the Frame on his FF Body? He might not be able to do anything to recover the image. I'm only pointing this out, because in reality, its not something a photographer would do, he'd get the right lens, or move forward or backwards.
Upvote 0

From InterBEE: Interview With the Head of Cinema EOS

Anyone get a weird feeling that the 5D3 + ML RAW hack will deliver much better video than any upcoming products other than the most high-end $$$$$$ ones? I have a weird feeling the new cams may end up with an even bigger meh and people will just use the 5D3. (The stills only users should have be happy though if so, as this would were it to be the case sustain 5D3 used prices very well so they could sell for a good price and get the new stills body.)

I sense continuing extreme segmentation and conservatism for anything but the single highest end model instead of a charging forward with the revolution.

Didn't the 5D3 prices suddenly spike way up again shortly after the ML RAW hack? And doesn't that imply that people were NOT happy with all of the critical UI features for video that they left out as well as the mushed, low DR quality it delivers without the hack? Everything was Blackmagic this and that and then the 5D3 hack seemed to be the only thing that staved off the complete rush over to use BM.
Upvote 0

Canon EF 24-105mm f4L super cheap at best buy

unfocused said:
Congrats. It seems some folks always feel compelled to rain on the parade.

That's a very good price for a non "white box" lens bought new. Best Buy has become very aggressive about matching prices, which I appreciate. I'd rather buy from a real store that employs local people if the price premium is not too great. (One reason I shop Barnes and Noble rather than Amazon whenever possible).

Did you use your Best Buy Card for the free financing? Don't forget to add the value of that into your savings if you did.

Oh, and this is a great all-around lens by the way.

Thank you!!! Actually I called their order support line and asked for a rep because I wanted to price match. I gave them the web site where they confirmed the product number and details. BB has a list of sites that they will price match with and Rakuten is on that list. I did use my BB Card.
Upvote 0

Advice - worth the jump 550d to 70d?

Rienzphotoz said:
paul13walnut5 said:
fragilesi said:
With a final thanks to everyone who offered help / opinion on this thread I have jut decided to make the jump and order the 70d. Very excited!

Please, rules of this thread are now that no-one may say a bad word about this decision or suggest I should have waited / bought something else! ;D

I will be back some time later to reflect on my impulsive abuse of the credit card ;D

Awww man!, the 80D's gonna have RAW and XLR inputs. Shoulda waited. ;)
I hear the 90D will be even better ;D

Darn, that'll teach me to be more patient in future :)
Upvote 0

DxO Mark

Neuro's example was the main one I was talking about and it's pretty sad they didn't publish a retraction. There was another review where they just changed the text, but I can't remember which one it was.

I wouldn't say their data is worthless, however. The scores, yes, the analysis, most times, but their measurements are pretty reliable. I've found the measurements on sharpness, CA, distortion, and vignetting to match my lens with the exception of my 180mm f/3.5L, which is extremely sharp in my experience, vs. their measurements. My guess is that they measured it a telephoto distance, where it has average performance, instead of at macro distance, where it is superb.

If you use the tools yourself, and compare lens metrics, not scores, it's a great and FREE resource.
Upvote 0

Anyone try the Olympus OM-D E-M1?

paul13walnut5 said:
With a grip the camera is nicely ballanced, there weren't any long fast aperture zooms to play with (do they exist?) but I really liked the 45 & 75.

I have an Oly 50-200 F2.8-3.5....it is a NICE lens and would fit a micro 4/3 with an adaptor... and weather sealed to boot... quite a step up from the F5.6 and 6.3 kit lenses...
Upvote 0

Things to get when you purchase a 600mm?

Morlin said:
I guess it will be the same for me. Most of the time I will have a Gimbal head stuck on because the only times I use a tripod so far is in the woods. Maybe some landscape photography in the future but for those days I will prepare even before I leave home.

I will buy the RRS leveling base also. Actually that one has been cheaper than the Gitzo leveling base. At least what I have found so far.

On top of the RRS leveling base is a 3/8" threaded stud, the gimbal head threads down onto that, but you can easily unthread it and mount a ballhead instead. Personally, I got the RRS leveling base with clamp, so I don't even need to unthread it, just open the lever; but, unscrewing it really doesn't take that long.

In fact, the leveling base is great for landscapes, if you shoot panoramic shots. Almost all good ballheads have a panning base, but for that to work properly for a pano shot, the tripod platform needs to be level. If you've ever tried leveling a tripod by adjusting the legs, you'll know that cam be a pain. The RRS leveling base has a bubble level, so getting a level base for a pano shot with a ballhead is really easy.
Upvote 0

Is Canon about to pull the plug on the 60D?

unfocused said:
LookingThroughMyLens81 said:
unfocused said:
Agree that Canon is likely phasing it out. I don't know of any cases where Canon has kept a camera in the lineup for long after its direct replacement has been announced. (Although they did seem to keep the 5DII for quite a while, but I think that was just an interim strategy until the 6D was announced, since the 5DII and 5DIII are significantly different cameras.)

I'm not sure, though, that it's correct to say the 60D is not selling well. The 60D body is still hanging in there at #9 on the Amazon best sellers chart, which is pretty impressive for a body that's been replaced. And, the refurbished store is now sold out of all 60D bodies and only has the 18-135 kit in stock.

Actually, its the 7D which doesn't seem to be selling all that well right now. It's barely in the top 50 of DSLRs on Amazon and the Canon refurbished store has more than 500 in stock. That may reflect that the 70D offers almost all the features of the 7D plus a few more, all at a slightly lower price while the 60D is selling at bargain basement prices right now.

The 7D has never sold well. It just doesn't fit in the marketplace that is stuffed with lower costing cameras. The best thing Canon can do in the future is to slim down it's DSLR line so that there are clear differences between the segments and to increase profitability by pushing the next generation of lenses in the retail markets.

That's absolutely not true. The 7D has been a very good seller for Canon. Does it match the volume of Rebels sold? Of course not. But, none of the enthusiast and professional cameras have ever come close to Rebels in sales.

The 7D has consistently been among the top sellers on Amazon since it was first announced. It is now four years old and still among the top 50 best selling DSLRs – no small accomplishment, especially as most buyers have been anticipating a replacement for a year now. Something which has undoubtedly cut into sales.

When it was introduced Canon clearly differentiated the 7D from other models in its lineup. Later, when the 60D was introduced, the differences between the 60D and the 7D were significant.

In order to upgrade the 60D Canon had to incorporate many of the features of the 7D into the 70D, or there would have been no reason for buyers to choose the 70D. So, today, 70D buyers are getting a camera with a marginally improved sensor and four-year old autofocus technology. If you shoot stills, the 7D is still a better choice, although not as much of a better choice as it was against the 60D.

This idea that the market cannot support a flagship APS-C body has been tossed around many times before on this forum, always without any evidence, information or research to support such statements.

The more expensive the camera the worse the sales :) The 1DX is probably the worst selling camera in the Canon Line-up.

We can argue about the need or demand for crop cameras of various capabilities, but in terms of raw numbers sold, it is the Rebels that are keeping the lights on at the factory... and the number of people who are so quick to defend the 7D and the number of people who seem so anxious to see a 7D2 would indicate that there is a pent-up demand for higher end crop bodies..

The line-up used to be 60D and 7D. It will be 70D and 7D2. Don't think of the 70D 7D lineup as anything more than a temporary blip... The only thing that some superior features of the 70D over the 7D means is that you can expect the 7D2 to be even better....

The 60D is a darn good camera.... but the 70D is superior in almost every way... eventually stock will be gone and that will be the end of it. The 7D2 will have about as much impact on 70D sales as the 1DX has on 5D3 sales.... at that level, you know what you want and you get it....
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,439
Messages
973,578
Members
24,805
Latest member
chrisgphoto

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB