Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Version 2 Coming?

I don't know man, i did shoot 640mm on APS-C a lot and VERY often i had to crop to get what i wanted. But sure, in ideal conditions from a hide it's fine. Try to shoot small birds out in the wild with 400mm. And 500mm might be only 20% more than 400 but it's 50% more pixels on the subject.
And don't compare the 45MP R5, where you can drop away half of the image with a 24MP full frame.
It's not the number of pixels on the subject that counts for resolution, it's the square root of the number. My speciality is shooting small birds in the wild, and I've posted thousands of images of them over the years on Canonrumors. And why shouldn't I compare it with the 45 Mpx R5/R5ii - it's what I shoot with. And for years before that the 50 Mpx 5DSR. I crop all the time, and it's the high resolution sensors that let me do so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
It's not the number of pixels on the subject that counts for resolution, it's the square root of the number. My speciality is shooting small birds in the wild, and I've posted thousands of images of them over the years on Canonrumors. And why shouldn't I compare it with the 45 Mpx R5/R5ii - it's what I shoot with. And for years before that the 50 Mpx 5DSR. I crop all the time, and it's the high resolution sensors that let me do so.
I am definitely neither a scientist, nor a mathematician, since I studied literature. So, could you please elaborate why "it's not the number of pixels on the subject that counts, but the square root of the number", as I don't understand the distinction. :unsure:
 
Upvote 0
I am definitely neither a scientist, nor a mathematician, since I studied literature. So, could you please elaborate why "it's not the number of pixels on the subject that counts, but the square root of the number", as I don't understand the distinction. :unsure:
Resolution is the ability to separate two parallel lines next to each other or separate two dots next to each other. That's why when you read the charts for the resolution of a lens it's given as line pairs per mm (LP/mm) or line widths per picture height (LW/PH) or for printers dots per inch (dpi). It is a linear measurement - measurements along a line in units of length. Area depends on length squared, measured in square mm or square inches etc. The total number of pixels is measured by the number of pixels in an area, not along a line of distance. When you double the number of pixels in a sensor, say from 22 Mpx to 44 Mpx, you don't double the resolution, you increase it by the square root of 2, ie by 41%. To double the resolution, you would have to increase the number of pixels in the sensor 4x to 84 Mpx. The same is true if you double the number of pixels in an image by doubling the focal length of a lens - although you increase the number of pixels by 4x, the distance between two parallel lines or two adjacent points is increased by only a factor of 2, the square root of the number of pixels. So, resolution varies as the square root of the number in an image.

That's now two beers or glasses of peaty malt whisky you owe me. It will soon be worth my while driving to Alsace to claim them.
 
  • Love
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
Resolution is the ability to separate two parallel lines next to each other or separate two dots next to each other. That's why when you read the charts for the resolution of a lens it's given as line pairs per mm (LP/mm) or line widths per picture height (LW/PH) or for printers dots per inch (dpi). It is a linear measurement - measurements along a line in units of length. Area depends on length squared, measured in square mm or square inches etc. The total number of pixels is measured by the number of pixels in an area, not along a line of distance. When you double the number of pixels in a sensor, say from 22 Mpx to 44 Mpx, you don't double the resolution, you increase it by the square root of 2, ie by 41%. To double the resolution, you would have to increase the number of pixels in the sensor 4x to 84 Mpx. The same is true if you double the number of pixels in an image by doubling the focal length of a lens - although you increase the number of pixels by 4x, the distance between two parallel lines or two adjacent points is increased by only a factor of 2, the square root of the number of pixels. So, resolution varies as the square root of the number in an image.

That's now two beers or glasses of peaty malt whisky you owe me. It will soon be worth my while driving to Alsace to claim them.
Thanks a lot! Even I understood your explanation.
You demonstrated the the French proverb: "Ce qui se concoit bien, s'enonce clairement". :)
OK for the malt!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0