Aussie shooter https://brettguyphotography.picfair.com/ Dec 6, 2016 1,196 1,878 17,011 brettguyphotography.picfair.com Feb 14, 2019 #2 Feb 14, 2019 #2 11-24 2.8. That's a no brainer. Reactions: 1 users Upvote 0
Meatcurry Aug 31, 2014 194 26 6,451 58 UK Feb 14, 2019 #3 Feb 14, 2019 #3 I wonder if they meant a 10-24 F4 with IS? Upvote 0
P padam Aug 26, 2015 1,460 1,074 14,883 Feb 14, 2019 #4 Feb 14, 2019 #4 Probably not, sensor-based IS should do just fine at that focal length, it should be pretty complex as-is (Sony doesn't have it in the 12-24/4 either) I have used the 11-24/4 on the Sony and the stabilization works well. Reactions: 1 user Upvote 0
Probably not, sensor-based IS should do just fine at that focal length, it should be pretty complex as-is (Sony doesn't have it in the 12-24/4 either) I have used the 11-24/4 on the Sony and the stabilization works well.
Click Jul 29, 2012 19,430 8,358 693,580 Canada Feb 14, 2019 #5 Feb 14, 2019 #5 Aussie shooter said: 11-24 2.8. That's a no brainer. Click to expand... +1 Reactions: 1 user Upvote 0
K Kit. Apr 25, 2011 2,574 1,946 9,306 Feb 14, 2019 #6 Feb 14, 2019 #6 Whichever can be made with a flat front element. Reactions: 1 users Upvote 0
