Will it be a souped up RF 135? RF 105? RF 70-135? What are your speculations? No f/2.8's in this category.
Will it be a souped up RF 135? RF 105? RF 70-135? What are your speculations? No f/2.8's in this category.
That would really be something!If they continue with portrait style lenses, a 105/1.4 or 135/1.8 would make sense, but Sony/Sigma/Nikon already have those. The lenses on their own might be 'wow', but not a first. Canon could fill in the wide end with a 24/1.2 and 35/1.2.
What I'm dreaming of (and won't be able to afford) is Canon announcing the high MP version of the R and going "Oh, btw, here's an RF50/1.0 with working autofocus to go with it. Enjoy!"
You know, I thought I was going to have a little bit of buyer's remorse for not waiting on the 85mm DS. Then I went and looked at Canon's photos on their website and decided I like the non-DS version better. Just a matter of taste. Not saying one is better than the other. Both are very nice. I do wonder whether there will be a premium on the DS. The article says the price will be higher. According to Canon, the DS version loses 1.5 stops of light transmission and it can't be turned off because it is a lens coating. The effect is lost as it is stopped down, but that is true with all bokeh on all lenses. So with all that, I'm thinking I made the right choice for me.And will the new lenses get a DS variant like the RF85?
I could really go for the 100mm f/1.4, but would prefer a f/1.224/35 F1.2? 14-21 F1.4? 100 F1.4?![]()
I've always wondered which lens that is. Wow!See the one in my Icon? Zeiss Planar 50mm f/0.7. There was a 35mm one as well. They are pretty much unobtainum..
Time for a long FAST! prime. A 500F2.8 should be suficently insane....
Time for a long FAST! prime. A 500F2.8 should be suficently insane....
Already done in green, time to proceed to 500mm f/2.
Yeah, a 180mm entrance pupil/front element would certainly be insane.
A 250mm e.p./front element would be even more so.
As nice as that would be, I sincerely doubt it based on the cost of the RF 50 f1.2 and how much work it clearly took to develop.If they continue with portrait style lenses, a 105/1.4 or 135/1.8 would make sense, but Sony/Sigma/Nikon already have those. The lenses on their own might be 'wow', but not a first. Canon could fill in the wide end with a 24/1.2 and 35/1.2.
What I'm dreaming of (and won't be able to afford) is Canon announcing the high MP version of the R and going "Oh, btw, here's an RF50/1.0 with working autofocus to go with it. Enjoy!"