If that 83 MPixel beast has a switch between full 83 MPix and the quarter of it, 20.7 MPix I am interested. ~21 MPixel is a good resolution for a lot of things. And it should provide very clean images due to the 1:1 mapping of the four R-G-B-G-Pixels into one final image pixel including good DR. No bayer decoding might make it a very fast format during viewing/postprocessing.
In some situations the full potential of this High Res sensor might be useful so I would accept giantic files and long processing time with ease. EDIT: And it would be interesting for use with EF-S lenses with very good res - thinking of 10-22 which is far from perfect but good enough for my ultrawide requirements.
Only thing I do not understand: Why not 3840 x 3 pixels wide for 4k material with no crop but 3x3 pixel binning. Or do they use crop in the size of super 35 with 2x2 pixel binning which would make sense.
In some situations the full potential of this High Res sensor might be useful so I would accept giantic files and long processing time with ease. EDIT: And it would be interesting for use with EF-S lenses with very good res - thinking of 10-22 which is far from perfect but good enough for my ultrawide requirements.
Only thing I do not understand: Why not 3840 x 3 pixels wide for 4k material with no crop but 3x3 pixel binning. Or do they use crop in the size of super 35 with 2x2 pixel binning which would make sense.
Upvote
0