Like the 90D and the M6.possibly 2 camera's, at the same time?
Upvote
0
Like the 90D and the M6.possibly 2 camera's, at the same time?
If it weren't, Nikon wouldn't have used it in D850.I thought that made little practical difference for FF sensors? I've certainly seen technically-minded people say that...
I wonder of they would release both the hi res R and an R2 at the same time? Not really a regular canon move but it would be a bold move if they did it
No need to worry, enjoy your camera, it deserves it!Just when I buy the EOSR, they announce a replacement, lol. My luck.
The original R was rushed and not competitive with Sony. Looking forward to the new R being better than a Sony.
I disagree. While it did not match the sony in specs I held the EosR, Nikon Z6 and sony a7r3 when they were all available at my local shop. The Eos R was good in the hand, The Nikon was not too far behind and the Sony was no better than a doorstop. No amount of incredible specs could have ever made me use one. Admittedly it looks as though Sony are finally addressing that issue with the A7r4, but with the firmware upgrades that have come out for the EOS R and the lenses canon are pumping out the RF system still looks to be better. I would say without a doubt the as far as an ecosystem goes Canon will be better than Sony but I doubt they will ever beat them in the spec sheet war. So it all depends on what you consider important.
Like I said. it is about what you consider important. The size of the spec sheet matters for some. Not for me. For me as a wildlife shooter who often has the camera in hand for 10-12 hours straight(on one battery I might add) the Sony have so far been the most unpleasant design I could imagine. You literally could not have paid me to use them. And yes, while the original R was not a finished product so to speak it is now and it has a lens lineup that already craps all over Sony for quality and due to Sonys poor descision at the start of their journey(the decision to use a small mount) will only continue to leave Sonys lenses in the dust.. I have no doubt that the next R will be much closer to what many of us would consider a 'professional' level camera as will the hi res R that will come out soon. And it is glaringly obvious if you look at releases like the 90d and m62 that Sony no longer has a massive lead in the tech specs and that canon have caught up enough in that area(and will continue to do so, most likely remaining just behind for the forseeable future), that the lenses will be the deciding factor into the future. I am definitely going to stick with the system that I know will be superior down the track due to the constraints of physics and optics.there will always be someone who lives canon that thinks everything they make is best
but the broad reviews don’t lie
The R was not good at launch.
Canon’s impressive firmware update made it competitive but not a leader. The price drops gave it more value. But it’s not a mirrorless 5D Mark. That’s why the new R is needed. The old R was a rush to get something out there in mirrorless.
Like I said. it is about what you consider important. The size of the spec sheet matters for some. Not for me. For me as a wildlife shooter who often has the camera in hand for 10-12 hours straight(on one battery I might add) the Sony have so far been the most unpleasant design I could imagine. You literally could not have paid me to use them.
Like I said. it is about what you consider important. The size of the spec sheet matters for some. Not for me. For me as a wildlife shooter who often has the camera in hand for 10-12 hours straight(on one battery I might add) the Sony have so far been the most unpleasant design I could imagine. You literally could not have paid me to use them. And yes, while the original R was not a finished product so to speak it is now and it has a lens lineup that already craps all over Sony for quality and due to Sonys poor descision at the start of their journey(the decision to use a small mount) will only continue to leave Sonys lenses in the dust.. I have no doubt that the next R will be much closer to what many of us would consider a 'professional' level camera as will the hi res R that will come out soon. And it is glaringly obvious if you look at releases like the 90d and m62 that Sony no longer has a massive lead in the tech specs and that canon have caught up enough in that area(and will continue to do so, most likely remaining just behind for the forseeable future), that the lenses will be the deciding factor into the future. I am definitely going to stick with the system that I know will be superior down the track due to the constraints of physics and optics.
You misread my comment I think. I was most definitely not praising the R as a wildlife camera. At this point I would not use ANY mirrorless as a wildlife camera because the EVF's are just not on a par with an OVF for that purpose. I was more referring to the better ergonomics of the eosR.I shoot wildlife and find it odd when anyone on the internet is bragging about the R for this purpose
it’s like drag racing with a corolla
Anons new lens system is promising but our conversation was about the R.
There’s a reason why a new one will be out shortly. The current R is a good cheap general camera. Nothing more unless a canon troll wants to make up something
Not speaking from experience, but doesn't the Sonys (like A9II, I think) perform well for that purpose and even with Animal eye-detect AF?At this point I would not use ANY mirrorless as a wildlife camera because the EVF's are just not on a par with an OVF for that purpose.
I am not referring to AF capability. That is no longer an issue with mirrorless. I am referring to staring through an EVF for long periods while waiting for something to happen. If you don't actually shoot wildlife seriously then you would probably be quite shocked at just how much time one can have their eye glued to the viwfinderNot speaking from experience, but doesn't the Sonys (like A9II, I think) perform well for that purpose and even with Animal eye-detect AF?
I have never seen a statement by Canon Executive about this on the next R. I might have missed it. I have seen plenty of speculation on this forum by members. I hope they are correct.my speculations:
- Canon exec's have consistently said the next R will have IBIS...
Being out of $ can be a huge advantage, it forces you to wait, which often means benefitting from a future price decrease, cashback or any kind of promotion...once you're solvent again.The new body does not concern me. I am wondering what the new lenses will be. Will they both be "L"? Maybe a fast 135mm prime (f/1.8 or f/1.8?) and fast 70- xxx zoom (f/2?)? I'm tapped out for cash for the next year or more, so no rush. Still, I would like to see either of those.