If it has the same measured resolution, why couldn’t you crop the same amount?
Yes, in terms of actual lines per image height instead of in terms of how many pixels the same amount of blur is spread across.
Upvote
0
If it has the same measured resolution, why couldn’t you crop the same amount?
So why Canon provides 12/20 fps when there is going to be so much latency as you believe. It won't be a 1dx mark iii performance wise. Rumours are rumours and we just speculating right now... but the latency has to be improved on milc cameras with newer bodies and fw updates as it has already (at some level ofc) on eos R. Also don't forget that Canon is a company that has used many times the same sensors on their bodies. As for 6 series you mention surprised, a year ago you wouldn't believe what Canon did with 1Dx Mark III, R5, cinema series etc...
This could be a great camera if it doesn't follow the path of the 6D MarkII. Canon terminally crippled that camera with an APSC auto focus system, shoddy sensor with poor dynamic range, and then a camera with wonderful ergonomics and battery life. It was a Frankenstein creation of nightmares
The IBIS in this camera will do a handful for extra power draw, so they could certainly make it with an LP-E17 class battery to achieve the worst battery life ever, and heavily limit record times as well, so like with an older Fuji, pretty much everyone has to buy the 200$ vertical battery grip and 50$ battery (plus a few extras) just to make it usable. Pity the camera's hardware development is already finished, so if they read this, they will realise the extra profit opportunity they've missed.
Hopefully the battery is a good size because this is a wedding photographers dream camera for reception,candies,etc. 20 megapixels is in that just right file size range, and would produce better high ISO then a bigger megapixel camera. I much prefer my 6D to my 5DIV when shooting reception pictures, because of the high ISO capabilities are a little better on the 6D,( don’t kill me this is my opinion) And the Centerpoint is absolutely golden in low light focusing even though it doesn’t have the sophisticated focusing system of the 5DIV the Centerpoint is absolutely golden in low light focusing and is still very useful.
I also wonder how many who criticize a camera, no matter which brand, have actually used or even held it...So say all of the Sony fanboys that have never, ever, not even once taken a photo as good as many hundreds of thousands that have been taken by actual photographers using the 6D Mark II.
That post was meant to be a joke. However, they are always quite serious about market segmentation, the LP-E6NH battery might be 'reserved' for the higher-class cameras.Or they could compromise on size/weight and use the newer, more powerful version of the LP-E6 that the R is getting which is also described by early rumors as "not the same battery as the 5D Mark IV."
We'll find out when they make the official announcement.
Maybe its next generation R1 sensor.The article makes clear it is not the *new* sensor used in the 1D X Mark III released barely two months ago. It says nothing about the possibility that it is another, older 20 MP sensor used by Canon in the past.
What advantage does 26 MP give you when cropping if there is no more actual detail in the image than the amount of detail a different 20 MP sensor can give you?
They don't have to, they only have to step up from the RP, which is the base of this camera. And it will certainly blow it away with the IBIS, dual card slots, quicker frame rates, improved AF and much better video specs.Maybe its next generation R1 sensor.
I think if they really want to make this mirrorless work,they need use newest parts available.
They need get shooting viewvinder lag away with fast read sensor and best processor or two.
I hope viewfinder is new .Good thing it got less resolution than r5 one ,without R5 computers it would lag.
And they need best parts to minimize power consumption too.
If you can get basically the same image when you shoot with a 26 MP sensor and a strong low pass filter as a 20 MP sensor and a more sophisticated low pass filter, the R6 is not a downgrade from the RP in terms of cropping capability.You seem to be too much obsesed by the detail.
1DX III sensor comparisons are out there, it is not quite as detailed as the RP at low ISO (and the R is better still), but it retains detail and colour much better at high ISO.If you can get basically the same image when you shoot with a 26 MP sensor and a strong low pass filter as a 20 MP sensor and a more sophisticated low pass filter, the R6 is not a downgrade from the RP in terms of cropping capability.
The 1DX III low pass filter apparently is a great improvement over the notoriously strong ones Canon used in the past. Is the filter in the RP so strong that it degrades the image to the point where a 20 MP R6 with the new filter will match the amount of detail it captures? Probably not, but we'll have to wait and see the difference once proper comparisons can be made.
Well, Sony fanboys and Canon bashers have loved to trash the 6DII since it was a rumor because spec warriors can sneer at the autofocus, the dynamic range and the single card slot. On the other hand, a lot of people who use it seem to be very happy with it. It has been a poster child for the Canon cripple hammer crew, along with the M50, and some them still seem to be trapped in their old cyberspace reality on the 6DII. They seem to have shut up about the M50 a while ago.So which is it?
"a wedding photographers dream camera for reception,candies,etc... (with a) Centerpoint (that) is absolutely golden in low light focusing even though it doesn’t have the sophisticated focusing system of the 5DIV the Centerpoint is absolutely golden in low light focusing and is still very useful."
OR
A "... terminally crippled (-) camera with an APSC auto focus system, (and) shoddy sensor with poor dynamic range?"
If you can get basically the same image when you shoot with a 26 MP sensor and a strong low pass filter as a 20 MP sensor and a more sophisticated low pass filter, the R6 is not a downgrade from the RP in terms of cropping capability.
The 1DX III low pass filter apparently is a great improvement over the notoriously strong ones Canon used in the past. Is the filter in the RP so strong that it degrades the image to the point where a 20 MP R6 with the new filter will match the amount of detail it captures? Probably not, but we'll have to wait and see the difference once proper comparisons can be made.
You are being unnecessary rude.Could you please take Mr. Clark and have some picnic somewhere? There is nothing more to suggest, if you are not able to freaking understand as simple thing as the ability to crop.
So say all of the Sony fanboys that have never, ever, not even once taken a photo as good as many hundreds of thousands that have been taken by actual photographers using the 6D Mark II.
Picnics aren't that great of an idea in these times If talking theory annoys you, feel free to ignore it.Could you please take Mr. Clark and have some picnic somewhere? There is nothing more to suggest, if you are not able to freaking understand as simple thing as the ability to crop.
You are being unnecessary rude.
++++ There is nothing more to suggest, if you are not able to freaking understand as simple thing as the ability to crop.No, I should just not need more than 3 posts to explain, that if I want to crop, then I want to crop, without the eventual need to consider other aspect. It's just similar argument when guys were telling those requesting 4K video, what do they need it for, if they produce FHD content. For the sake of being able to crop.