No, and it was never claimed to be.Is the electronic shutter global? I expect not.
It should be a lot quicker than the R5 & R6 readout though, so less distortion in electronic shutter/video modes
Upvote
0
No, and it was never claimed to be.Is the electronic shutter global? I expect not.
"The rolling shutter distortion is reduced to about 1/4 of that of the EOS-1D X Mark III in electronic shutter mode."Is the electronic shutter global? I expect not.
It only works when using the EVF. The sensors that detect where your eyes are looking, are within the EVF housing.The "Eye Control AF" seems nice. Does it work both when using the display and the viewfinder?
Yep… this time I bought from B&H with PayBoo. 1st body I have ever purchased from B&H. The sales tax back made it the only purchase option I consider.I wonder how many are pre-ordering from B&H using their PayBoo card. This is my first time placing a large order since retailers have started collecting taxes from Florida purchasers. For me, with a $420 hit and a tight budget, B&H seemed to be the only option.
Overall, a very solid camera for high-speed low-light photography. For me the highlights are the following:
1) 1/64000 top shutter speed with electronic shutter
2) full 14 bit files with electronic shutter at 30 fps
3) electronic shutter at three speeds of continuous shooting of 3, 15, 30 fps
4) solid high ISO noise performance
5) Assignable Q menu
6) More flexible customization
7) built-in GPS
8) Weighs almost 1 lb lighter than the 1Dx Mk3 and about 200 gram lighter than a R5 with the vertical grip attached.
9) Better low-light AF than the 1Dx Mk3.
gps is there!Looking great! 6000 EUR is steep though. I like the small speed-lite transmitter. The networking features are great. But I'm missing GPS...
But 24mp BS! this camera just caught up to the A9II, except it has worse battery life. Wildlife photographers will continue to use the r5, the r3 is only good for sports shooters. Ok camera, but nothing ground-breaking (the eye AF tracking is not as revolutionary as eye AF)I also like that it is full 14-bit files at 30 fps. No 12-bit BS!! Preorder through B&H at 6:00 am this morning
Allow me to explain, the resolution trick consists in shooting your subject with an A1 and editing the metadata so that it reads it was taken with a canon r3!An inaccurate rumor, apparently.
So you joined Aug 11 and have nothing useful to contribute. Why join?Allow me to explain, the resolution trick consists in shooting your subject with an A1 and editing the metadata so that it reads it was taken with a canon r3!
But 24mp BS! this camera just caught up to the A9II, except it has worse battery life. Wildlife photographers will continue to use the r5, the r3 is only good for sports shooters. Ok camera, but nothing ground-breaking (the eye AF tracking is not as revolutionary as eye AF)
Ouch! the LP-E19 will only last 30% of the shots on the R3 vs the 1Dx Mk III:
Battery Life: With LCD Approx.860 shots (at 23°C)Specifications & Features - Canon EOS R3
The EOS R3 full-frame professional mirrorless camera is designed to meet the demands of professional sports photographers with high reliability and durability.www.canon-europe.com
Battery life: Viewfinder shooting Approx. 2850 (at 20°C)Specifications & Features - EOS-1D X Mark III
Pursue Perfection with the EOS-1D X Mark III - Canon's most advanced DSLR ever.www.canon-europe.com
I was thinking I could easily get away with not getting a 2nd battery, since I never chewed through a full charge on my aging 1Dx. Guess I need a Battery #2 anyway.
Thanks for the info.Don't worry about it. If it worked that way, those using the R3 for the olympics would not be pleased.
Battery life was mentioned in a review I saw this morning. Can't remember who it was but it was a lady bringing the R3 to what looked like a trackday. I think she was at 4000 shots and the battery had gone down one of four bars and she mentioned that the standard calls for excessive power cycles and time spent reviewing images on the back screen.
The 65K SEK seems in line with the 48.295 DKK (=65.880 SEK). With the €6100 indication, I had expected 49.500DKK (67.500SEK).Price in Sweden came in a positive surprise;
1Dx - 87kSEK
Sony A1 - 77kSEK
R3 - 65kSEK
Sony A9II - 48kSEK
Yes, prices here are ridiculous but at least Canon didn't shaft us this time. The Sony A1 is really questionable at its pricepoint but then so is the 1Dx (at approximately $10k)
Yes, the CIPA ratings for battery life include reviewing shots and on models with built-in flash, using that flash. It is meant to simulate an average day of use. If you hold down the shutter at 30fps you'll get *a lot* of shots on a single charge with a big enough CFe card.Don't worry about it. If it worked that way, those using the R3 for the olympics would not be pleased.
Battery life was mentioned in a review I saw this morning. Can't remember who it was but it was a lady bringing the R3 to what looked like a trackday. I think she was at 4000 shots and the battery had gone down one of four bars and she mentioned that the standard calls for excessive power cycles and time spent reviewing images on the back screen.
The 65K SEK seems in line with the 48.295 DKK (=65.880 SEK). With the €6100 indication, I had expected 49.500DKK (67.500SEK).
Minor positive suprise, yes.
Thanks for the datapoints. The R5 with the LP-E6NH is rated at 490 shots, so the R3 with the more powerfull LP-E19 is rated for +75% shots.So far I can get "half a day" out of a battery on the RP and the R5, but that decreases when using lenses with powerfull IS like the 100-500. Last weekend I did 700 shots in 3 hours and had about 50% left on the R5, using the RF100 macro and EF180 macro. It was cold enough for the tree frog to stay in place, so fewer shots in a burst. But when I do long bursts for DiF and shoot some video in between I can empty out a battery in an hour or so.
Nope, the pro wildlife photographers are using the r5 and a1 period! cropping extends your range significantly especially for wild life photography. Those still shooting with lower mp bodies are simply the old guard who refuse to embrace the advantages of high megapixel bodies or the broke amateurs.You do know that many pro wildlife shooters and enthusiasts are using the Canon 1Dx line and the Nikon D4 to D6. Of late the most popular are the R6 and Z6. High MP bodies aren’t the be all and end all as not everyone crops.