I happily shot with two systems for the first year of covid when I wasn't travelling. The advantage of a single system is that when we travel abroad, my wife and I can take two bodies, types of lenses, shared battereis, a pair of back up chargers, cables etc, so our lenses and cameras back each other up if a lens or/and a camera fails in the middle of nowhere. Usefully now with in-body charging, our computer chargers are back ups.I would rather have two systems than switch. There will always be lenses on both sides that I want or that are so specialised that the other wont make. Canon is all but required for photographing jumping spiders for instance. And Nikon have the best wildlife lenses with the 400 f/2.8 TC, 500 PF, and 800 PF. I will be using my 100-400 S with my 800 PF, though that 100-400 S could just as easily be a RF 100-500 on a R5. At the end of the day it is CF Express cards full of images getting dumped into Capture One, edited, then printed. And no one is going to tell between two pictures I am selling if one was from Canon or the other was from Nikon.
Upvote
0