Are new dream lenses coming for the RF mount? [CR1]

[HikeBike]

RF 20-85 f/2.8 L IS USM with adjustable autofocusing speed. Fast-focusing for photos. Smooth-focusing option for video. One can dream.

 

[Fbimages]

A 500 f2.8! I'll hapilly hit the gym more to be able to carry it

 

[fasterquieter]

Tamron's 35-150 F/2-2.8 for RF would be amazing.

 

[CanonGrunt]

I’d like to see a modern version of the 50mm f/0.95 Rangefinder or EF 50mm F/1 L lens.

 

[Bob Howland]

I second that, if they would also make a 200-500 F4 D0 with built in 1.4 teleconverter.

At the risk of repeating myself, a 200-500 f/2.8-4, that holds f/2.8 to 350mm. A built-in teleconverter would be nice but by no means essential.

 

[Bob Howland]

In honor of those wedding photographers who use 35mm and 85mm primes, how about a 35-85 f/1.8 zoom?

 

[Chaitanya]

Personally I am waiting for 180mm IS USM Macro(without focus shift) and replacement to EF-S 35mm Macro for RF.

 

[mccasi]

astro wide angle lenses: the designs discussed for years esp. the 14-28 F2... heck i'd even take a 14-22 F2 at this point 15-35 F2.8 image is just not exciting

 

[ERHP]

Even after purchasing the RF600 f/4L IS I would love to see an RF600 f/4L w/flippy 1.4X TC. Cannibalizes the 800 f/5.6L market but would be perfect for how I like to shoot.

 

[mb66energy]

2.0 - 4.0 / 70-300 would be great if there would be a video constant f/4 mode if you use the zoom during video ...

 

[Berowne]

Oh, if we're allowed to dream...
I really want to get the new RF 100-400, it's affordable and I could really use that extra reach, I just wish for a little more, so it could be an "always on"...sort of

a 50-500mm F/8 that's a bit bigger for 999.- maybe? Well, we were allowed to dream

Minolta once had a 8.0/100-500mm Zoom: Minolta MD 8.0/100-500mm

 

[Berowne]

I would like to see a RF-Wideangel-Lens without much vignetting.

 

[wockawocka]

35-85mm 1.8 or f2

That would be fine thanks Canon.

 

[scyrene]

It's clickbait but I'll indulge.

An f/1 or f/0.95 lens with AF.

A macro telephoto zoom (Nikon made one?), say 80-200mm (preferably f/2.8 but f/4 acceptable) with IS.

And having just obtained the RF 800 f/11 (lacking a body to mount it on yet) I would have loved an extra stop, so 800mm f/8 IS.

 

[bergstrom]

Lets make the dream (affordable) FF camera first.

 

[fox40phil]

A uw TS-E zoom.
135 1.8, small, lightweight, great performance, but not for 2.000€... 1500€ would be great.
50 1.4
200-600 with TC.
Lightweight tele with 500/600/800mm and NOT f11!!

Sport lenses like 120-300 2.8, 300-800 etc.
400mm 2.8 with TC!!

More lenses with built in TCs!!

 

[MaxDiesel]

Wouldn’t mind seeing Canon compete with the Fuji lens lineup in the RF-S line and not expect us to use Full Frame on APS-C.

23mm 1.4
35mm 1.4
56mm 1.4 (or 1.2 like Fuji, but if 1.4 makes it much smaller, I’ll take 1.4)

Love my R5 but those f/1.2 lenses are not really street friendly, which is why I own Fuji but prefer Canon.
Give us good fast primes and I’m all-in on this new RF-S lineup.

Still waiting on that Full Frame 35mm 1.2 or 1.4!

 

[D Prime]

A 500 f2.8! I'll hapilly hit the gym more to be able to carry it

This one is mine. I'll add: similar minimum focus to the RF/EF III 400mm f/2.8, and a built-in 1.4X TC. (Switchable, not permanent like the stupid RF 800mm f/5.6.) Also, controls that I can use without moving my hands when shooting.

 

[Blue Zurich]

RF 200-600 f/4-6.3L

 

[Chaitanya]

While an f2-4 70-300mm lens is not going to happen, I can very much see an f4 70-300 mm zoom to replace both the 70-300 L zoom and the 300mm f4.

Sigma used to sell 100-300mm f/4, it was a pretty decent lens and quite an attractive option for EF 300mm f/4L.