Here's my profile: beginner photographer, getting into Cannon's mirrorless EOS R, but I want my first lens to either be:
Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM (I know, older but great for wide shots etc., and yes, know I need the adapter)
or
Get the EOS R with the kit lens: RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM
I want to shoot around NYC, portraits, travel, food, scenery, landscapes etc.
EVENTUALLY, I'm going to save up for RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM Lens.
So, should I get the EF 16-35mm f/4L with EOS body? Or EOS body with kit lens RF 24-105mm f/4L IS?
It'll be pretty much the same price, but since ultimately I'll get the 70-200, should I be fine with 15-35 EF for walking around photography?
Plus, the EF 16-35 will still take stunning shots with EOS R and mount, correct?
Would love opinions etc
Thanks in advance, Happy Holidays!!!
Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM (I know, older but great for wide shots etc., and yes, know I need the adapter)
or
Get the EOS R with the kit lens: RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM
I want to shoot around NYC, portraits, travel, food, scenery, landscapes etc.
EVENTUALLY, I'm going to save up for RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM Lens.
So, should I get the EF 16-35mm f/4L with EOS body? Or EOS body with kit lens RF 24-105mm f/4L IS?
It'll be pretty much the same price, but since ultimately I'll get the 70-200, should I be fine with 15-35 EF for walking around photography?
Plus, the EF 16-35 will still take stunning shots with EOS R and mount, correct?
Would love opinions etc
Thanks in advance, Happy Holidays!!!