and from that article (http://www.kamerabild.se/tester/vi-har-provat-canon-eos-5d-mark-iv?nodePage=3)
"In this case, the conditions were great for after adjusting the image because I personally think that the result was above expectations, although I had no expectations ...
future tests will show the tolerances required for a good end result, but this feature can really be very useful in certain situations, if you can make use of the altered workflow required (setting for the photo shoot, conditions and after treatment).
For best results, according to Canon using a focal length of at least 50mm and an aperture of f / 5.6 or lower, and an ISO setting of 1600 ISO or lower.
Photographs for example, a portrait with a 50mm lens, will the shooting stand 1-10 meters from the camera, at 100mm 2-20 meters, and at 200mm 4-40 meters from the camera."
So both articles are correct, just that one seems to have tested within Canon's recommended limits, no?
"In this case, the conditions were great for after adjusting the image because I personally think that the result was above expectations, although I had no expectations ...
future tests will show the tolerances required for a good end result, but this feature can really be very useful in certain situations, if you can make use of the altered workflow required (setting for the photo shoot, conditions and after treatment).
For best results, according to Canon using a focal length of at least 50mm and an aperture of f / 5.6 or lower, and an ISO setting of 1600 ISO or lower.
Photographs for example, a portrait with a 50mm lens, will the shooting stand 1-10 meters from the camera, at 100mm 2-20 meters, and at 200mm 4-40 meters from the camera."
So both articles are correct, just that one seems to have tested within Canon's recommended limits, no?
Upvote
0