You're just asking for an onslaught of people telling you to accept the fate.I just wish it would be a 7d Mk iii...
Makes me wonder about Tamron's 35-150 2.8-4 lens for full frame. What some think as a weird focal length, I think as brilliant. I was never happy with the 24-70/105 or a 70-200 so maybe....Remains to be seen how well their 16-80/4 performs. Hoping it’s quite good - what a useful range and speed on APS-C!
They will. The 2 latest g series have an usb-c port that allow usb charging during use.Keep the same batteries, but allow for USB to charging direct to the camera. That would be so 2014ish.
Charging during use? In effect, external power for the camera? That would be useful for some shooting time lapse / astro. No Canon ILCs currently offer that (the R/RP allow USB charging of the internal battery, but camera functions are disabled during charging).They will. The 2 latest g series have an usb-c port that allow usb charging during use.
Unfortunately doesn't work with underwater housingsThey will. The 2 latest g series have an usb-c port that allow usb charging during use.
Well that's it, let the underwater Sony exodus begin!Unfortunately doesn't work with underwater housings
Information from the 5th slide from DPRCharging during use? In effect, external power for the camera? That would be useful for some shooting time lapse / astro. No Canon ILCs currently offer that (the R/RP allow USB charging of the internal battery, but camera functions are disabled during charging).
I see no reason why they might be bad for macro photography. Any particular concerns?what do You think,m6 II or m5 II,would be good for macro photography?
well,i found it somehow pleasered.32,5 mp,but after using dslr`s just feeling me unsure to make the change.only question is would I can mount the ef lenses(prob will be some adapter)I see no reason why they might be bad for macro photography. Any particular concerns?