120 Film recommendations? Development lab recommendations? To be shot Pinhole.

cayenne

CR Pro
Mar 28, 2012
2,868
796
Hello all,

I ended up getting and receiving one of the ONDU 3 pinhole cameras, 6x12 Multi-format ones.

I've been looking at what films to try....thinking B&W first.

Does anyone have recommendations?

I've read you should get decently fast film, due to potential long exposure times.

Looking at maybe:

ILFORD Film, maybe the Delta 400 Film
or maybe:
Kodak Tri-X 400

And even for color I think the Kodak Portra films?

anyway, can someone give me a recommendation on where to start please?

Also, while I think eventually I'd like to try to do my own developing, while I'm trying out exposures and taking notes to compare, I'd like to use a lab to develop and take that variable out of the equation.

Can someone recommend a good lab to develop my 120 film?

I'm thinking I"ll try my hand at scanning them myself, but would like recommendations on where to send them to be developed.

Thank you all in advance!!

Cayenne
 
You can't go wrong with Tri-X in my opinion. It has very wide exposure latitude, can easily be pushed and pulled, has a very pronounced "film-grain" look even when scanned and can be developed by almost any lab. I've never used the Delta 400 but it has a good reputation for a fine grained B&W film. Delta 400 is similar to Kodak's TMAX which I have used quite a lot. In my opinion those T-grain type films are best used for images where you want to preserve a lot of detail.

The Ilford equivalent to Tri-X is their Hp5 which is also really nice. If I were shooting with a pinhole I'd probably be using either Tri-X or HP5.
 
Upvote 0

cayenne

CR Pro
Mar 28, 2012
2,868
796
You can't go wrong with Tri-X in my opinion. It has very wide exposure latitude, can easily be pushed and pulled, has a very pronounced "film-grain" look even when scanned and can be developed by almost any lab. I've never used the Delta 400 but it has a good reputation for a fine grained B&W film. Delta 400 is similar to Kodak's TMAX which I have used quite a lot. In my opinion those T-grain type films are best used for images where you want to preserve a lot of detail.

The Ilford equivalent to Tri-X is their Hp5 which is also really nice. If I were shooting with a pinhole I'd probably be using either Tri-X or HP5.

Oh my, THANK YOU for the info and advice!!

Any labs out there for developing that you could recommend?

Again, much appreciated!!

C
 
Upvote 0
Can't really help on the lab. I live in a big metro area and there are a couple local labs with counter service that can handle film processing. My advice would be to find a local lab if you can. It's nice to be able to talk to a person if you have a question and local labs can definitely use the support. 120 film processing shouldn't be too hard to find.
 
Upvote 0

cayenne

CR Pro
Mar 28, 2012
2,868
796
Can't really help on the lab. I live in a big metro area and there are a couple local labs with counter service that can handle film processing. My advice would be to find a local lab if you can. It's nice to be able to talk to a person if you have a question and local labs can definitely use the support. 120 film processing shouldn't be too hard to find.

Ok thank you.
I did call one of the larger camera and print shops locally. She said they did handle 120 film, but sent it off, and was $20/roll to develop.
:O

And that it would take a month to get back. So, guessing that's not the best deal. I'm still looking, but haven't found exactly a 'local lab'....I live in the New Orleans area.

So at this point, guess I"m looking for online labs to send to like in my old 35mm days I did in college for snapshots for the family.

Anyway, THANK you for your replies.....

Anyone else out there know of good film labs to work with?

cayenne
 
Upvote 0
Surprised there isn't a film lab in a town with as many creatives as NOLA. All those hipster shops along Magazine and nobody catering to film users? Seems like an opening for the right entrepreneur.

Wish I could help on mail in labs. Fair price for a roll of "process only" 120 film at a better quality lab should be around $10 and they should turn it around in 24-48 hours. Processing 120 B&W film is pretty easy and you don't really need a darkroom (if you can work in a light proof bag) but in my opinion it's worth $10 to have someone else do it.
 
Upvote 0

cayenne

CR Pro
Mar 28, 2012
2,868
796
According to this article, Bennett's Photo in Metairie is the last film developer in Louisiana.

D'oh!!! Thanks, I'd forgotten about them....I'd called Lakeside Photography that's over there, but didn't think about Bennet's!!

Thank you, I'll give them a look for developing!!

I went ahead and ordered 5 rolls of the ILFORD Delta 400 and 5 rolls of the Kodak Tri-X 400 from B&H....was like $6-$7 a roll I think, should be here by Tues and considering we're getting heavy rain here all weekend, that will suffice.

Again, thank you for the help, I'm usually good at researching and wow...I dropped the ball on Bennet's.....

C
 
Upvote 0

stevelee

FT-QL
CR Pro
Jul 6, 2017
2,383
1,064
Davidson, NC
Why don't you develop the film yourself? I did it when I was a kid and it was great fun and dead easy, and would be a nice way to complement the pinhole experience. And, you could make your own contact prints.
When I was a kid, my uncle gave me his old box camera, a Kodak Brownie, I think, of some size like 616 film. I bought a plastic device for developing the film. It had a little knob on top that would spin the film to agitate in the chemicals. Just as with the developing canisters I bought for 35mm years later, you loaded the film into it in the dark, and then back in the light could pour chemicals in and out. I also bought small developing trays and a holder to make contact prints. The contact printing paper made gorgeous prints. The pictures were more postcard size, but the look was as good or better than anything I ever got out of enlarger paper. I still have some of the prints. They still look great.

But these days, if I were just going to scan in the negatives and I had a lab nearby, I'd gladly pay them $7 a roll. Over a period of almost 50 years, off and on, I had plenty of darkroom fun to hold me, color, black and white, prints, slides, infrared, maskless negatives from slide film, Cibachrome, solarization/Sabatier, etc.
 
Upvote 0

AlanF

Desperately seeking birds
CR Pro
Aug 16, 2012
12,348
22,524
When I was a kid, my uncle gave me his old box camera, a Kodak Brownie, I think, of some size like 616 film. I bought a plastic device for developing the film. It had a little knob on top that would spin the film to agitate in the chemicals. Just as with the developing canisters I bought for 35mm years later, you loaded the film into it in the dark, and then back in the light could pour chemicals in and out. I also bought small developing trays and a holder to make contact prints. The contact printing paper made gorgeous prints. The pictures were more postcard size, but the look was as good or better than anything I ever got out of enlarger paper. I still have some of the prints. They still look great.

But these days, if I were just going to scan in the negatives and I had a lab nearby, I'd gladly pay them $7 a roll. Over a period of almost 50 years, off and on, I had plenty of darkroom fun to hold me, color, black and white, prints, slides, infrared, maskless negatives from slide film, Cibachrome, solarization/Sabatier, etc.
That experience changed your life, didn't it! Those postcard sized contacts were gorgeous.
 
Upvote 0

stevelee

FT-QL
CR Pro
Jul 6, 2017
2,383
1,064
Davidson, NC
That experience changed your life, didn't it! Those postcard sized contacts were gorgeous.
It certainly did, in more ways than is obvious in these messages. And the look of those prints gave me something to aspire to in my darkroom work and could well still influence me today in Photoshop and in making black and white prints on my Epson that has shades of gray among its nine inks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0

cayenne

CR Pro
Mar 28, 2012
2,868
796
Why don't you develop the film yourself? I did it when I was a kid and it was great fun and dead easy, and would be a nice way to complement the pinhole experience. And, you could make your own contact prints.


That is the eventual plan if I find this to be a fun new avenue to pursue in earnest.

I've even seen YouTube videos out there with people developing with household substances like coffee, etc....which might produce some fun results.

I did find that the local place here, Bennet's Photo in the Metairie, LA area still does film....they're closed this weekend, but have emailed them to ask the particulars.

My film should be in here for B&H by Tuesday, so with decent weather, I hope to do some shooting this coming weekend.

C
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0

stevelee

FT-QL
CR Pro
Jul 6, 2017
2,383
1,064
Davidson, NC
That is the eventual plan if I find this to be a fun new avenue to pursue in earnest.

I've even seen YouTube videos out there with people developing with household substances like coffee, etc....which might produce some fun results.

I did find that the local place here, Bennet's Photo in the Metairie, LA area still does film....they're closed this weekend, but have emailed them to ask the particulars.

My film should be in here for B&H by Tuesday, so with decent weather, I hope to do some shooting this coming weekend.

C
Let us see some of the results, please.

If you get serious about this, try to get your hands on some of Ansel Adams’ books. They could help you with concepts relevant to digital photography also, and Raw conversions.
 
Upvote 0

cayenne

CR Pro
Mar 28, 2012
2,868
796
Let us see some of the results, please.

If you get serious about this, try to get your hands on some of Ansel Adams’ books. They could help you with concepts relevant to digital photography also, and Raw conversions.

Will do!!
Oh good idea on the books. Do you have any in particular you could recommend?

C
 
Upvote 0