Chisox2335 said:Gregg said:I'm on the fence too. I have never liked the 5D series (I have a mark iii). I love the IDX body which is the only true pro Canon body with amazing ergonomics and ruggedness but I am still disappointed with the sensor. I use my 1DX mainly for studio and portraiture and I am still envious of what is now a relatively old Nikon D810 sensor which has a great combo of DR and pixel count. I might consider the Mk II if it offers a huge improvement in DR. Annie Leibovitz used to shoot with a 1D iii and then moved to Medium Format. I have however seen her still using 35mm sometimes and she now uses a Nikon D810! Canon have let down portrait photographers as far as I am concerned and focus only on sports and PJ's.
Why wouldn't you use the 5DS series? The build of the 1D seems like overkill for a studio camera. You could always grip the 5DS and have a similar feel albeit not identical with a 50 mp camera
Because a 1D-series rig has a little more going for it than a vertical grip. There used to be a line of 1Ds cameras for the detail crowd, and it amassed followers over the years. Those followers liked everything a 1D camera could do but other product lines could not.
In short, the merging of the 1D4 and 1Ds3 into the 1DX delivered a camera that principally delighted the sports/wildlife camp and (largely) left the resolution camp out in the cold. Landscapers, studio photographers, etc. have had to choose the most excellent 1D feature set @ 18-20 MP or had to downgrade their photography experience just to get a higher res sensor.
- A
Upvote
0