1DX vs 5D3

[Drizzt321]

You can buy a single-use camera for underwater use for 10 bucks, please don't tell me the best reason we can come up with to get a DOUBLE priced 1d X over a 5d3 is the damn weathersealing???

Please compare that underwater camera to what the 1DX can do. No real comparison.

Leaving that aside, 2 different target groups. The single-use underwater cameras are only good down to a few meters, no interchangeable lens system, no super advanced controls, no real viewfinder. Oh, and probably use ISO 400-800 film, which they develop and give you a CD.

And no, the price difference is not purely weathersealing. Some of the cost, yes, but much of the rest is different sensors, more electronics/processors, additional AF & metering, built-in dual battery grip, etc, etc. Oh, and the shutter can handle more actuations and double(!) the frames per second. And take more frames until the buffer is full. There's a ton of small and large things between the 1DX and the 5d3.

 

[Loswr]

...please don't tell me the best reason we can come up with to get a DOUBLE priced 1d X over a 5d3 is the damn weathersealing???

Please don't tell me the best reason we can come up with to get a FOURTEEN HUNDRED dollar higher priced 5DIII over a 5DII is better AF??? Please don't tell me the best reason we can come up with to get a DOUBLE priced 5DII over a 60D is a bigger sensor??? Follow that logic to the end and you'll be doing all your shooting with that $10 disposable camera.

 

[wockawocka]

The only thing the 5D3 does better than the 1DX is the silent shutter.

As far as IQ goes it is a leap ahead. I'm sick of seeing performance based around ISO.
Quality of the files themselves, their clarity and their dynamic range is also a big factor.

The 1DX renders files like no other. It's absolutely superb.

I'm a wedding photographer who's shot 12+ weddings with the 5D3 and 5 with the 1DX.

 

[Viggo]

...please don't tell me the best reason we can come up with to get a DOUBLE priced 1d X over a 5d3 is the damn weathersealing???

Please don't tell me the best reason we can come up with to get a FOURTEEN HUNDRED dollar higher priced 5DIII over a 5DII is better AF??? Please don't tell me the best reason we can come up with to get a DOUBLE priced 5DII over a 60D is a bigger sensor??? Follow that logic to the end and you'll be doing all your shooting with that $10 disposable camera.

Well, that's taking it to a even farther extreme than I did ...

My point is, I know the spec lists, I know the 5d3. But from the OP and others I read around on using BOTH cameras it seems like half a stop better noise, which is pretty much expected at 4 mp less and "better built" is it...

But the 1d X is being said as to have WAY better tracking and AF accuracy and speed, but I'm just trying to see if that is Canon-talk, or if it really offers a much better AF and tracking than the 5d3, which in all honesty, could be better and it could be WAY worse like the 5d2.

Misunderstand me the right way. I think the 5d3 is the most substantial upgrade from one model to the next Canon has EVER done, and it couldn't be any better at that price point.

MY point is, what does the 1d X offer in real life, that defends paying double? I've dropped my 5d3, been out in soaking weather drowning where my 50 L started to fog up inside and still the 5d3 didn't miss a beat. So build is very good.

If the AF/Tracking, in real life, doesn't offer anything better than the 5d3, it's half a stop better, heavy as crap (compared) 200 images more on a battery(used to be 2000 images more) no headphonejack, no better DR(?) I just can't see the point....

So of anyone using both cameras can show me a clear cut difference and situations where the 1d X kills the 5d3 for tracking and or IQ in 6400 iso light, I so want to see it, because there are a lot of features with a 1d I would really like back (used to own the 1d3 and 1d4), but not at any cost. Not when I see just how much better camera the 5d3 is over the 1d4.

 

[Loswr]

Why is the Porsche 911 Turbo S better than the 911 Carrera? If you have to ask, maybe a Toyota Camra (pun intended) is the better choice for you?

Here's what Bryan at TDP says:

Canon EOS 1D X Feature Advantages Over the EOS 5D Mark III
More advanced metering system (100k pixel, 252 zone RGB vs 63 zone iFCL)
EOS iTR AF (Intelligent Tracking and Recognition AF including facial recognition)
Frame rate is 2x faster (12 fps vs. 6 fps)
Higher frame burst rating (RAW: 38 vs. 18 rated / 54 vs. 33 tested)
AF point-linked spot metering and Multi-spot metering
Faster AF driven by more powerful battery pack (with select Canon L lenses)
EV 0-20 Metering range (vs. EV 1-20)
Higher native ISO settings available (51200 vs. 25600)
Higher expanded ISO settings available (204800 vs. 102400)
Less high ISO noise
Faster X-sync speed (1/250 vs. 1/200)
Dual DIGIC 5+ processors plus DIGIC 4 processor dedicated to AE functions
(5D III has a single DIGIC 5+ processor and a non-specified AF-dedicated processor)
Higher battery life rating (1,120 vs. 950 shots)
Higher shutter durability rating (400,000 vs. 150,000 cycles)
Higher viewfinder magnification (.76x vs .71x)
Shorter viewfinder blackout time
Viewfinder provides more nose relief from LCD (less nose spots on LCD)
Has a viewfinder shutter
Built-in Ethernet Port
More advanced self-cleaning sensor
Better Weather Sealing
Built in vertical grip
Accepts optional focus screens
7 LCD brightness levels (vs. 3)
More custom functions (31 vs. 13)

 

[canon816]

The only thing the 5D3 does better than the 1DX is the silent shutter.

As far as IQ goes it is a leap ahead. I'm sick of seeing performance based around ISO.
Quality of the files themselves, their clarity and their dynamic range is also a big factor.

The 1DX renders files like no other. It's absolutely superb.

I'm a wedding photographer who's shot 12+ weddings with the 5D3 and 5 with the 1DX.

So you have seen that the 1DX is far better then the 5DIII when it comes to Image Quality? If so that is certainly saying something as the 5DIII files are really nice.

 

[LetTheRightLensIn]

I read the KR comparison and find it interesting when he talks about how the ISO of the 5d3 is incorrectly calibrated, so when you set it to ISO 100, it really is shooting at 160-200, and so on. For marketing purposes it would help since now 12800 is very usable even if it is only 6400, and also explains why the 5d3 at similar (100-400) ISO's has more noise than the D800...

that is backwards the 5D3 is more conservative than 5D2 for rating ISOs so when you shoot ISO3200 with both the 5D3 is really already doing what the 5D2 would call ISO4000

 

[LetTheRightLensIn]

Dual DIGIC 5+ processors plus DIGIC 4 processor dedicated to AE functions
(5D III has a single DIGIC 5+ processor and a non-specified AF-dedicated processor)

having dual digic itself is a disadvantage since it means no Magic Lantern

of course the things it allows, already mentioned, more fps are great

 

[JR]

What about the dynamic range? Any thoughts on how the 1DX stackes against the 5D mkIII in that regards?

 

[heheapa]

I missed the HDR function in 5D Mark III. Hope will see the feature in coming 1dx firmware release

 

[Dylan777]

What do you guys want to see? Just tell me and I'll spend the next few days doing it. I have the 1D X, 5D3, and 1D4. I can shoot whatever.

low light & AF PLEASEEEEE

 

[Viggo]

Oh, I read it all what I can find about specs and know them by heart from.October last year, but I fail to see any proof the tracking is better, not just on paper...

The af and tracking is the main reason why I choose cameras, so I guess the 5d3 is the best choice...

And if we look at what USED to separate the 5d and 1d, I think it's very safe to say the 5d3 is by far the best Canon value for money...

And the difference between å 60d and å 5d is way bigger than the 5d3 and 1d x, so I don't get that point Neuro...

 

[M.ST]

Hello sanj,

I prefer the old 1 Ds Mark III and the 5D Mark II for landscapes.

Yes, the 1D X has no wheel with C1 to C3. Thats what I wrote. With the wheel you can change very fast your settings. Changing the settings with a 1D xxx Body is much slower.

 

[M.ST]

Reply to: I missed the HDR function in 5D Mark III.

The 5D Mark III HAVE one of the best in-camera-HDR-functions.

But I prefer the new bracketing with 7 shots and the preproduction with Photoshop CS6 Extended or the latest Photomatix version.

 

[nightbreath]

What do you guys want to see? Just tell me and I'll spend the next few days doing it. I have the 1D X, 5D3, and 1D4. I can shoot whatever.

Color rendition difference between 1Dx and 1Ds please

 

[clicstudio]

I am interested to hear from anyone who has used both cameras. I have two 5D3s and I am a wedding photographer. I love my cameras but I am always curious if there is something better that will help me do my job better. I am interested if the AF is just a little faster and better and I have also read that the sensor may be a little better. Anyone have any experience with the two cameras?

The focusing on the 1DX is faster and sharper. Only
By a 15% or so. Nothing major but noticeable.
I tested both with the same lightning setup and the same 24-70
f2.8L lens.
Also, listening to the machine gun-like sound of 12fps is
Amazing. Even the sound of the shutter is clean and sturdy. The old 5D II sounded horrible. I
Love the sound of the 1D X
The best advantage of the 1D X is the ergonomics and feel. Even with the grip, the 5D doesn't feel as sturdy and comfortable, but with the extra 4MP and $3000 price
Difference, the 5D is the clear choice.

 

[Viggo]

I am interested to hear from anyone who has used both cameras. I have two 5D3s and I am a wedding photographer. I love my cameras but I am always curious if there is something better that will help me do my job better. I am interested if the AF is just a little faster and better and I have also read that the sensor may be a little better. Anyone have any experience with the two cameras?

The focusing on the 1DX is faster and sharper. Only
By a 15% or so. Nothing major but noticeable.
I tested both with the same lightning setup and the same 24-70
f2.8L lens.
Also, listening to the machine gun-like sound of 12fps is
Amazing. Even the sound of the shutter is clean and sturdy. The old 5D II sounded horrible. I
Love the sound of the 1D X
The best advantage of the 1D X is the ergonomics and feel. Even with the grip, the 5D doesn't feel as sturdy and comfortable, but with the extra 4MP and $3000 price
Difference, the 5D is the clear choice.

Thanks, I seems that way to me also.

 

[bdunbar79]

All right, I'm still out shooting, but so far my general observation is if you have the 1D Mark IV, the clear upgrade is the 1D X. If you already have a 5D Mark III, you would not substitute the 1D X for the 5D Mark III. So far I'm not seeing anything difference in regards to IQ. I did a really far crop on one photo out in a field, and the depth of detail stops shorter in the 1D X photo, likely due to the less 4 mp than the 5D Mark III. Well, now this is interesting. Like Brian mentioned, the coloring looks different because I'm thinking the 1D X and 1D4 for that matter, you can even throw in the 1Ds3, seem to be metering more accurately and the colors look a bit more accurate. Sometimes the auto ISO on the 5D3 is slightly off, even though it says the exposure is correct, whereas the 1D X, 1D4, and 1Ds3, are never wrong. Photos to come.

 

[Viggo]

All right, I'm still out shooting, but so far my general observation is if you have the 1D Mark IV, the clear upgrade is the 1D X. If you already have a 5D Mark III, you would not substitute the 1D X for the 5D Mark III. So far I'm not seeing anything difference in regards to IQ. I did a really far crop on one photo out in a field, and the depth of detail stops shorter in the 1D X photo, likely due to the less 4 mp than the 5D Mark III. Well, now this is interesting. Like Brian mentioned, the coloring looks different because I'm thinking the 1D X and 1D4 for that matter, you can even throw in the 1Ds3, seem to be metering more accurately and the colors look a bit more accurate. Sometimes the auto ISO on the 5D3 is slightly off, even though it says the exposure is correct, whereas the 1D X, 1D4, and 1Ds3, are never wrong. Photos to come.

Awesome, thanks for going out of your way to provide your experience, means a great deal!

The metering on my 5d makes me miss the 1-series option to adjust 0 ev on the scale... my 5d3 is usually off by at least one full stop to my liking, always +1 or up to 3 stops up in backlight situations...

 

[bdunbar79]

All right, I'm still out shooting, but so far my general observation is if you have the 1D Mark IV, the clear upgrade is the 1D X. If you already have a 5D Mark III, you would not substitute the 1D X for the 5D Mark III. So far I'm not seeing anything difference in regards to IQ. I did a really far crop on one photo out in a field, and the depth of detail stops shorter in the 1D X photo, likely due to the less 4 mp than the 5D Mark III. Well, now this is interesting. Like Brian mentioned, the coloring looks different because I'm thinking the 1D X and 1D4 for that matter, you can even throw in the 1Ds3, seem to be metering more accurately and the colors look a bit more accurate. Sometimes the auto ISO on the 5D3 is slightly off, even though it says the exposure is correct, whereas the 1D X, 1D4, and 1Ds3, are never wrong. Photos to come.

Awesome, thanks for going out of your way to provide your experience, means a great deal!

The metering on my 5d makes me miss the 1-series option to adjust 0 ev on the scale... my 5d3 is usually off by at least one full stop to my liking, always +1 or up to 3 stops up in backlight situations...

Yep. Same thing I noticed. The 5D3 pictures are SHARPER than the 1D4, it's just I have to adjust exposure and color in post. The 1D Mark IV pictures I can literally not even touch the exposure bar and I noticed this with the 1Ds3 and 1DX. That is an excellent point to note! I'm headed out now to do some landscape shots in the afternoon/evening sun, some telephoto shots on distance objects, and then some high ISO night shots indoors. I would like to do a bit more low ISO work, but that may take a day or two to get in those situations. I have a ton of ISO 400 work from yesterday, but that's not really what I wanted; I was hoping for 50-100.