++cellomaster27 said:gobucks said:Frodo said:cellomaster27 said:Is this lens good for stars? I just use it mainly for night photos and low light situations.
Is it good for stars? Short answer: no, coma is bad. My Samyang 14mm/2.8 is waaayyy better - no coma to speak of.
Not sure if that contributes to lovely soft bokeh when shooting near wide open.
But this is a great available light lens and I haven't been bothered by OOF light points. With astrophotos I tend to be more technically critical.
I also consider it to be a great light, available lens. Its wonderfully small (without hood) and light lens on my 6D. So I take it most places and so is more available than e.g. by 24-104/4.
Pairs nicely with my 85/1.8.
I haven't tested coma, but the reviews I saw were not positive on it. That being said, apparently the 28mm 1.8 is a total disaster in the coma department http://www.lenstip.com/253.7-Lens_review-Canon_EF_28_mm_f_1.8_USM_Coma_and_astigmatism.html
So if you were using your 28mm 1.8 for stars before, I doubt it will be any worse, but not really any better. Judging by most people's comments, if you are really into night sky photos, it's probably worth it to just shell out $300 for the Samyang as a dedicated star lens (it gives you the side benefit of a mega ultra wide lens for architectural photos). IIRC, you want as wide a view as possible to allow for longer exposures without star trails, so neither the 28mm or 35mm are ideal for that.
Thank you everyone! Really really helpful! I feel stupid for not knowing how the 28mm fared in the coma department.. but now I know! ;D I'll have to try to sell it and fund a future 35mm f2. and samyang for christmas?besides, I don't use the 28mm at 1.8 too often.. it is an amazing lens though. Thanks again!
I have found this to be a very good thread for providing useful information. And it hasn't devolved into a DR discussion.....
Upvote
0