4 new lenses from Sigma.

[NorbR]

Wow, that 100-400 looks more like a 70-300 from Canon, in terms of size. Is that for FF?

Yep, "DG" is Sigma talk for full frame.
All these lenses are for full frame.

 

[Sharlin]

Wow, that 100-400 looks more like a 70-300 from Canon, in terms of size. Is that for FF?

Yes, DG.

 

[slclick]

Renderings or actual shots?

 

[ahsanford]

These lenses look quite real. From PR (from NS):

http://photorumors.com/2017/02/19/pictures-leaked-of-the-three-new-sigma-art-and-one-contemporary-lenses/

100-400 is slower than the EF version which might explain its small size.

- A

 

[Jopa]

https://www.sigmaphoto.com/article/sigma-unveils-new-products-at-cp-plus/

https://www.sigmaphoto.com/article/new-sigma-100-400mm-f5-63-contemporary/

https://www.sigmaphoto.com/article/new-sigma-135mm-f18-art/

The articles got pulled? The links are still there on the front page but don't lead anywhere.

That was quick LOL
Hope Alex saved the pages.

 

[arbitrage]

A few more images of the new lenses....

 

[slclick]

A 100-400mm would only make sense to me if it had lower f-numbers than the already existing 150-600mm.

Or if it's considerably cheaper. A $600 100-400mm?? If it's any decent optically it could sell like hotcakes.

Contemporary are less expensive than Art so I would expect a narrower than Canon's version to come in at sub $1k

 

[ahsanford]

Did I see that right? The zoom and focus rings are in reverse positions for what I am used to with the canon zooms I own. And the 24-70 focus ring looks very tiny.

- A

 

[Jopa]

Can't wait to get my hands on the 135mm 1.8. I owned the Sony 135 1.8 ZA, my first FF lens actually, and it was quite magical

 

[rfdesigner]

"Sigma 14mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art (full frame lens)"

If this comes true... and it's not too heavy or pricey... I will have a serious look at it. Art-quality, 600g (at most hopefully) and about ~900€, that'd seem like a good deal for me.

This one would be even better for astrophotography than the Sigma 20mm f/1.4 Art...

Rokinon 14 2.8 - 550g
Canon and Nikon 14 2.8 - 650g
Rokinon sp 14 2.4 - 800g

I'd bet it comes in over 1kg if it's real

I'm going to bet it will come in around 1.7kg

the weight is going up just shy of a cube law.... the body weight should go up approx linearly with aperture, while glass weight will be a cube function.

 

[Jopa]

"Sigma 14mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art (full frame lens)"

If this comes true... and it's not too heavy or pricey... I will have a serious look at it. Art-quality, 600g (at most hopefully) and about ~900€, that'd seem like a good deal for me.

This one would be even better for astrophotography than the Sigma 20mm f/1.4 Art...

Rokinon 14 2.8 - 550g
Canon and Nikon 14 2.8 - 650g
Rokinon sp 14 2.4 - 800g

I'd bet it comes in over 1kg if it's real

I'm going to bet it will come in around 1.7kg

the weight is going up just shy of a cube law.... the body weight should go up approx linearly with aperture, while glass weight will be a cube function.

I bet $1 it'll be less than 1.3. The Sony is less than 1kg, but it's a 77mm thread / full metal.

 

[Alex_M]

the lens appears to be slightly smaller than 12-24 Art so under 1kg weight hopefully?

http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=31996.msg651920#msg651920

"Sigma 14mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art (full frame lens)"

If this comes true... and it's not too heavy or pricey... I will have a serious look at it. Art-quality, 600g (at most hopefully) and about ~900€, that'd seem like a good deal for me.

This one would be even better for astrophotography than the Sigma 20mm f/1.4 Art...

Rokinon 14 2.8 - 550g
Canon and Nikon 14 2.8 - 650g
Rokinon sp 14 2.4 - 800g

I'd bet it comes in over 1kg if it's real

I'm going to bet it will come in around 1.7kg

the weight is going up just shy of a cube law.... the body weight should go up approx linearly with aperture, while glass weight will be a cube function.

 

[Bennymiata]

I wonder how the new Sigma 24-70 will compare to the Canon version?
The OS of the Sigma version certainly interests me.