I'm ramping up my "running" event photography and the perfect lens will be a 400 5.6.
I know it's controversial to say, but I find its rendering "better" than any zoom; even though the best zooms are very good and very versatile.
With that, I can see how a 70-300 will be very useful at times which points to the smaller zoom/400 prime combo.
Does that combo make sense, at least sort of, or is it a thought to slightly compromise and just make life easier with the 100-400II?
THANKS.
I know it's controversial to say, but I find its rendering "better" than any zoom; even though the best zooms are very good and very versatile.
With that, I can see how a 70-300 will be very useful at times which points to the smaller zoom/400 prime combo.
Does that combo make sense, at least sort of, or is it a thought to slightly compromise and just make life easier with the 100-400II?
THANKS.