Dear all,
this one is for the advanced users only - and ONLY about the 50L - and only about close
subjects and only about wide apertures...
I am interested in your experiences with this special one, best 50L with 5DIII or 1Dx.
I know that this is the trickiest Canon lens.
And this was and sometimes still is giving me headaches.
It is absolutely tricky to nail the focus with this one.
And I still have a lot of misses.
Please don't give me hints like the DOF is very thin... or be aware of moving the thin focus pane etc.
Believe me - I can exclude subject movement and camera movement.
I have multiple calibrated bodies and calibrated lenses as well - all calibrated separately to neutral 0
by Canon. I did have multiple copies - all behaved very similar.The current 50L was calibrated twice.
I think I have learned the following:
a)
Shooting portraits I always use the center focus point aiming on the eye with ONE SHOT or SERVO, even with 5DIII I do avoid outer focus points because they behave differently and may cause trouble.
b)
This lens can't be properly calibrated by Canon or via MA at all because of the focus shift issue.
It can be calibrated on distances greater than approx. 2m, there you might have no issues.
c)
On closer distances we must face focus shift. Focus shift depends on aperture and subject distance,
this is why you can't get a unique calibration which always does fit.
d)
I had two copies, both behaved like this:
On close distance (approx. 1m) I have to use micro adjustment around -10 for f/1.2.
On close distance (approx. 1m) I have to use micro adjustment around -15 for f/2.
On close distance (approx. 1m) I have to use micro adjustment around -20 for f/2.8
I am not much interested in other apertures at this distance.
On distances > 2m I use MA = 0. No issues.
Makes sense to me because the lens always uses f/1.2 for focussing. For other
apertures focus shift kicks in when taking the picture. (Does not explain why I have
to start with -10 right at f/1.2 - maybe otherwise the lens does not perform in other scenarios?)
e)
Anyway the lens is inconsistent, keeper rate is still only around 60% even using the technique above.
So I am interested in you experts how do you deal with this lens?
Do you have the same findings?
Is there someone having no issues and who does not need MA for apertures < f2.8 at close distances?
(I read a post somewhere where someone was stating having no problems and did show totally
blurred pictures to prove is flawless equipmentt ;-) )
No - I am interested in you pixel peepers - accepting nothing but crisp sharp pictures where the focus
is spot on.
Please concentrate on just the 50L.. all the others (85L, 135L, 35L, 50 1.4) are all easy stuff compared
to this one.
Tell me - how do YOU tame the 50L beast?
How do you take crisp sharp images?
Regards, Tom
this one is for the advanced users only - and ONLY about the 50L - and only about close
subjects and only about wide apertures...
I am interested in your experiences with this special one, best 50L with 5DIII or 1Dx.
I know that this is the trickiest Canon lens.
And this was and sometimes still is giving me headaches.
It is absolutely tricky to nail the focus with this one.
And I still have a lot of misses.
Please don't give me hints like the DOF is very thin... or be aware of moving the thin focus pane etc.
Believe me - I can exclude subject movement and camera movement.
I have multiple calibrated bodies and calibrated lenses as well - all calibrated separately to neutral 0
by Canon. I did have multiple copies - all behaved very similar.The current 50L was calibrated twice.
I think I have learned the following:
a)
Shooting portraits I always use the center focus point aiming on the eye with ONE SHOT or SERVO, even with 5DIII I do avoid outer focus points because they behave differently and may cause trouble.
b)
This lens can't be properly calibrated by Canon or via MA at all because of the focus shift issue.
It can be calibrated on distances greater than approx. 2m, there you might have no issues.
c)
On closer distances we must face focus shift. Focus shift depends on aperture and subject distance,
this is why you can't get a unique calibration which always does fit.
d)
I had two copies, both behaved like this:
On close distance (approx. 1m) I have to use micro adjustment around -10 for f/1.2.
On close distance (approx. 1m) I have to use micro adjustment around -15 for f/2.
On close distance (approx. 1m) I have to use micro adjustment around -20 for f/2.8
I am not much interested in other apertures at this distance.
On distances > 2m I use MA = 0. No issues.
Makes sense to me because the lens always uses f/1.2 for focussing. For other
apertures focus shift kicks in when taking the picture. (Does not explain why I have
to start with -10 right at f/1.2 - maybe otherwise the lens does not perform in other scenarios?)
e)
Anyway the lens is inconsistent, keeper rate is still only around 60% even using the technique above.
So I am interested in you experts how do you deal with this lens?
Do you have the same findings?
Is there someone having no issues and who does not need MA for apertures < f2.8 at close distances?
(I read a post somewhere where someone was stating having no problems and did show totally
blurred pictures to prove is flawless equipmentt ;-) )
No - I am interested in you pixel peepers - accepting nothing but crisp sharp pictures where the focus
is spot on.
Please concentrate on just the 50L.. all the others (85L, 135L, 35L, 50 1.4) are all easy stuff compared
to this one.
Tell me - how do YOU tame the 50L beast?
How do you take crisp sharp images?
Regards, Tom