marvinhello said:Old Shooter said:I'm excited about the backup! Wedding shooters/Event photographers will appreciate the peace of mind!
You can get SanDisk's Extreme Pro (90 MB/s) 64GB SDXC for $190...
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/824149-REG/SanDisk_SDSDXPA_064G_A75_Extreme_Pro_64GB_SDHC_SDXC.html
Their Extreme Pro (90 MB/s - UDMA 6) 64GB CF is $390...
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/646880-REG/SanDisk_SDCFXP_064G_A91_64GB_Extreme_Pro_CompactFlash.html
For you speed demons, their (100 MB/s - UDMA 7) 128GB CF is $800...Spendy!
Note that the 95MB/s Extreme Pro SDXC is UHS-1 standard, it's still unknown if 5D3 supports UHS-1, if not, maximum speed will be capped at around 30MB/s
richard_mitchell said:I'm of the opinion that neither format (CF or SD) are superior. Of the SD/CF cards that I've had fail, they are usually of a very low quality, which is perfectly fine for some people as their career doesn't depend on the card.
I will most likely have this configuration:
- 64GB CF card: RAW originals
- 8GB Eye-Fi Pro X2: High quality JPG
The options are limitless if you have a laptop and know how to create scripts.
Have a look at the prices on play.com, they have a 16GB Extreme Pro CF card at £89.99. I recently got one a bit cheaper again from Robert White, but it was during a special offer.tt said:Looking at Sandisk cards in the 8-32GB range -
Does anyone have any recommendations between the 60MB/s & 90MB/s?
£80 gets you 1x 60MB/s 16GB SanDisk Extreme 400x UDMA CF
£129 gets you 1x 90MB/s 16GB SanDisk Extreme Pro 600x UDMA CF
£59 gets you 1x SanDisk 16GB Extreme Pro 95MB/s SDHC
£120 gets you 1x SanDisk 32GB Extreme Pro 95MB/s SDHC
£95 gets you 2x SanDisk 16GB Extreme Pro 45MB/s SDHC Card
What would be good for a) video or b) Taking a series of shots - would the different cards hit buffer full at different times?
Would you go for a 32GB 60MB/s CF cards for more GB for video (AI-I looks a GB eater!)? Or 2x 16GB 90MB/s CF cards?
Edit - Reading http://www.learn.usa.canon.com/resources/articles/2012/5d3_hd_video_features.shtml?categoryId=122
* HD 50 fps or 60 fps recording places the greatest demands on memory card speed, especially during ALL-I recording. Required read/write speed during HD 720p ALL-I recording for CF cards is 30 MB/sec; for SD cards, 14MB/sec.
CF cards – UDMA "mode 7" support
SD cards – SD, SDHC, or SDXC-compliant cards are supported
(not compatible with UHS-I high-speed writing)
crasher7 said:CF has a huge durability factor in it's favor as well. I've cracked a few SD cards in my time. Not too mention what my kids have done to theirs!
wamsankas said:this is extremely confusing for me. on amazon the sandisk extreme pro 16gb SD at 95 mb/s is 70$ the CF card at 90mb/s is 110$ .... why would a faster/smaller card be cheaper? why wouldnt everyone just buy the SD?
http://www.amazon.com/SanDisk-Extreme-Performance-SDSDXPA-016G-A75-Packaging/dp/B006FKD01K/ref=sr_1_15?ie=UTF8&qid=1330793569&sr=8-15
http://www.amazon.com/SanDisk-16GB-Extreme-memory-card/dp/B002OL80UK/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1330793653&sr=8-3
stuartblance said:anyone recommend this card for MKIII?
http://www.amazon.co.uk/SanDisk-Extreme-16GB-SDHC-Card/dp/B005LFT3MA/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_2?s=computers&ie=UTF8&qid=1331475409&sr=1-2-fkmr0
stuartblance said:anyone recommend this card for MKIII?
http://www.amazon.co.uk/SanDisk-Extreme-16GB-SDHC-Card/dp/B005LFT3MA/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_2?s=computers&ie=UTF8&qid=1331475409&sr=1-2-fkmr0
kennethpfeifer said:Picked up an Eye-Fi Pro card and threw it in my S100 while I wait for the 5DM3. After watching a few marketing videos from Eye-Fi, my thoughts were to have the EyeFi sync with my iPad and display the JPGs generated near realtime for things like studio headshot work. Figured I could give clients some assurance/feedback as the shoot progressed rather than stopping to show the back of my camera.
Just so you all know, even with the 12.1mp S100 jpgs, the transfer rate is pretty damn slow, even on my home network wifi. It seemed to take between 30 and 45 seconds per image. After a few images the pipeline seemed to stop, and I had to restart the S100 and iPad2 app a few times to get it going again.
It was my first time playing with it all, so maybe I noobed it up, but my experience with it so far is a little less encouraging for those purposes.
Hell, it's still incredible, just nowhere close to realtime.
UDMA 7, the latest fastest CF option. Def a plus for video but for photo 60mb/s up to 150 will all work fine. Chuck westfall says the faster the better just be above 30mb/s for the best experience. That is a synopsis of what i read on a post that he answered questions, not sure where.Mt Spokane Photography said:The newer Canon model might write to a CF card much faster than the 5D MK II did. I'll need to see some tests before going out and buying a super fast card.
I believe that It takes SDXC cards which have larger potential capacity and speed, but you might need a new card reader for them.
My experiences with the 24 or so cards i havedarryl said:First post!!! At some point reading just isn't enough. ;D
I use a canon 60D so I know some about SD cards and close to none about CF. So I figured I'd share and then ask a question.
The Class on SD cards is a minimum writing speed which is supposed to be guaranteed even at non-optimal conditions. So technically you could have a class 4 that writes much faster than 4MB/s. Sandisk is known for having much higher write speeds then the class rating.
Also if you are looking for a review on SD cards on the 1D mark IV look here.
http://www.slashgear.com/sdhc-flash-memory-performance-on-canon-eos-1d-mark-iv-2082467/
And here for a good comparison site.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/sdxc-sdhc-uhs-i,2940-12.html
Now for my question. I normally buy SDHC cards no bigger than 8gb for fear of "putting all your eggs in one basket". SD cards are known for going bad sometimes. Does this happen with CF cards as well? I'd love to get bigger storage CF cards (for a mark II i'll prolly buy soon once the "price drop" happens *crossing fingers*) if they are more reliable.